Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Long Range Hunting Accumark ?

....Well again, you are more than welcome to come pay me a visit at anytime you wish and view for yourself first hand, all of my fabrications and imaginations.

I`ll just wave a magic wand when you get here and then it will all just magically appear.

Well, I`ll have to disagree with you there,,,,"your high-ness!" There is such a thing as in-consistent moas. So when you say its "impossible to make it anything other than consistent" moas,, you are absolutely full of crap up to your eye balls and even up to the crown of your damn skull.

My version of consistent moas, IS consistently putting 3 shot groupings within a 1" inch or less circle; centerhole to centerhole. What in hell is your angular measurement horseschitt have anything to do with anything where groupings are concerned? You dummy!

With my best reloads, the Accumark does exactly that.

And then after you see it all for yourself, then I`ll have to do my best to keep from planting your ass into the hospital wing of your choice.

Well I did state that you should hold your breath until I sought out your advice via a PM. Right? Hard to seek advice from someone who has suffocated himself to death. Right?

My imagination will certainly work alot of overtime wishing for that one. But since you always coward out from a face to face with me and always side step merrily around that issue, then all I can do is hope for someone else or maybe something else to,,,,,,,,,well U know!

The Stick-Boxer cockroach has come forth from his crevice..Again! I can tell that your dictionary was right by your side.

Penchant? Fruition? Copius? Extrapolate? Unerring? Subtensions? Did you have an english/vocabulary coach pay you a visit too,,,again?

I know what "ONE MOA" is. New that before you were somehow "miserably hatched" into this world. My meaning of "consistent moa" and less shooting, meant @ 100 yards.....BONEHEAD.

FYI, The Accumark did reeeeeel well today. But you are right though, it was an imaginary hunt.

Because I wasn`t hunting you dummy. It`s called target shooting. The hunts w/Accumark will come later.

Unlike you who needs a vocab and english coach, I don`t need any "hunting in the field" coaching when the Accumark is used.

Go back into your crevice now.

Oh and aaaaaah,,,,,,,,,,bless your little heart.

Of course you weren't Hunting,that was never even plausible. I also dig that you "new" all about MOA and am always happy to hear your "version" of things.

Interesting "version" to switch tunes from: "I`ll be thinking about you while I`m shooting a rifle and scope that you "REALLY" dislike, while at the same time getting consistent moas."...to now being enthralled with an inch group at 100yds?! Akin to saying "consistent inches",which the reality of will collide nicely with your Imagination. Perhaps all is sweetened a bit in that you fancy yourself a wordsmith and "new" all of that,while fixating "moas"(a plural),to reap an Imagined constant.

You'd do well to take notes and apply same,but the inherent humor in your being too stupid to realize same,is in fact beyond Priceless.

Bless your heart.

Dan,

Just make sure you are right,when you write and have a leg to stand upon. You see how the opposite "works" ala 'squeeze's Imagination and her "version".

Laffin'!




'squeeze,

You are so stupid,you don't even know what you mean or what "version" you'll fabricate next,due to that glaring shortcoming between your ears. Noone else is accountable to read your mind or jump the hurdles of your Imagination,as a means of smoothing over your perpetual ineptitude.

Noone in the history of the World has denoted a 100yd 1" cluster upon paper as "consistent moas". Though I'm humored that your stupidity is so grand,that it troubles even you. I dig your attempt to "clarify" your "version" of one minute of angle at 100yds and it is very funny indeed,that you are lathered up by trying to brag up 1" patterns at the 100yd line. Though of course I may be mistaken and you are bitching about such poor results,due your "version" of a LR rifle and scope. If that is the case,you'd be correct for the first time and I concur that such "performance" is dismal at best.

Bless your heart.

.............Your wall crevice was getting a little hot again for you there Mr. Cockroach? Needed some air?

Always welcome another visit from the Stickboxer, so that he can grace the forum with his marvelous apptitudes and intelligencia as usual.

Well based on all the postings here on this thread, there wasn`t one current Accumark owner who posted any agreement with your first original post. Nor were there any former Accumark owners who posted anything that agreed with your same original post either.

Your score on this thread, was a big ZIP, a big ZERO, and a big NADA.

And since it seems that you either cannot read or comprehend too well, the OP not only asked for actual hunting experience with the Accumarks, but also welcomed other opinions too, not limited to only hunting. And in my original reply, I never said that I hunted with mine...."AND" is a big word. Must have slipped by the wonderful neurons between your ears.

Let`s face some possible facts there Stickyboxer. Had I not replied as an Accumark owner in my first post, I don`t think you would have posted such negative comments about the Accumark within your first post? C`mon admit it!

You posted that just to be your usual and typical azz hole self; replying about one of the rifles I (whom you dislike) happen to own. Everyone sees through that.

In the future, I fully expect you to sometimes trail in behind me and trash not only the rifles I own if the subject comes up, but also trash my opinions and experiences as well as was the case on this thread. No doubt, you do get your jollies trashing the ones you don`t like and trashing their equipment.

Well Sticky, its been fun. It is quite apparent, that you got no support from any of the current Accumark owners who posted here on this thread.

This thread is all yours now, to trash and lie about whatever and about whomever (no doubt me) that you wish.

So have it. Soon this thread as they all do, will work its way to the back pages and be all forgotten.

But you won`t be forgotten. You are afterall, the all knowing and all seeing rifle guru, who`s in depth knowledge of rifles and hunting, along with your personal maturities and mastery of the english language,,,,,can never be matched.

I'm afforded the luxury of not being forced to guess,which is reliably arranged by doing,instead of Imagining. Stark differences,though I heartily encourage you to stay the course of pretending and practicing your Imagination,as a means of "fulfillment". Those enthralled with 9-lug Bee's simply haven't shot much,if only obviously. Hand a boob 9-lugs and he'll be twitterpated,hand it to the gent with a clue and he'll smirk at the humor and hand it back.

What's funny is,that even Salvage gets some trigger time as a Precision Rifle,yet 9-luggers never do(whether it LE circles,or more grueling circumstances). Fairly telling when even Barney Fife knows better and it is more than a touch poignant that you do not. I do reckon it fitting however,that you as a 9-lug Champion have never punched a tag with your much "heralded" brainfart,but Imagine it doing rather nicely as your Trump Card in it's "favor". Rather poetic,I must say(pathetic too).

After all the racket you made about your failing to understand the most basic principles of MOA,you stayed the course and felt compelled to brag about a 1" 100yd pattern and that is more than a whole bunch funny. Now it's back to your latent whining,upon how all your copious stupidity is someone else's fault. Reality is,that Imagination isn't reality...which you so eloquently quantify. Not that you do so on purpose,which only frosts the cake.

Feel free to Imagine all you can,the "merits" of the horribly handling,schit balanced,loud and heavy LR platform which suits your "version" of capable. May as well say something about two pokes in the belly too and their "advantages". My 9-lug disdain was founded from the first date(20 some years ago) and continues to this day. Roy was a whole bunch better at cartridge design than action design and that remains a constant that is hardly a "secret".

I admire your uncanny ability to greedily grab at slack rope and to expertly make yourself look more stupid than any outside party ever could,then whine and cry about how you hung yourself. That is indeed a novel approach and it reiterates nicely what your "version" of "experience" entails,which is simply large quantities of Imagination.

So while you are assuredly enthralled with a G.I. Joe with the KungFu grip,dote mightily on the powers of Imagination,are a Black Belt Mall Ninja of repute,consumate Window Licker of legendary status and eager to come out of the closet to boot...all are fortunate that those realities do not curtail your penchant to feverishly find a first clue.

Bless your heart.

She's a clueless dolt,set adrift less oars in the vast seas of her Imagination and under the illusion that noone can tell.

Bless her heart.

Never mind the free bore and funky shoulders.

Experience and opinions on the Wby Mk V Accumark for longish range mule deer, elk and bear hunting?

And... What thoughts on .30-378 & .338-378 ?

Too much cartridge? Value?

Kind of thinking a .257 for most stuff, and something bigger for, well, bigger stuff.

Thanks, Guy