Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Time For Class Proving Evolution

Oh legless one. Give it a rest. You are out of excuses and never had a clue of what you were talking about from the vary being.

If one day, you actually read something, even Steven J. for instance, it might help you immensely.

But now that we have you driven into a corner, why not just be quiet?

Oh, I've got good legs dickweed. Did a whole bunch of bodyweight front squats last night. I ain't wastin' time reading SJ's silly schit, and be quiet, just because you asked? Not likely. An objective perusal of this thread will show about a dozen unanswered questions by you darwinian dolts for every one not answered by the those who dare to question your sacred "texts".

Not in this argument you don't. You're as legless as the descendent of that lizard that evolved into a snake.


Keep trying, or better and smarter, just be quiet and maybe even learn (no, not possible I suppose).

Gotta link to that fossil? Of course not.

Is that what your science has shown you? Why then, since tomato have been around for thousands of years are we using them for explosives?



Again your world view is showing. You are assuming there is not God directing these things. How does one side of a snowflake know what the other side of the snowflake is doing? I am thinking radially here.



YOu see tornadoes and lightning as examples of order? I supose Japan had a couple of fantastic orders at the end of WW2, then didn't it?



This is predicted by the creation/curse model. It certainly is contrary to the evolution concept of order from disorder.



Only evolutionists argue against this point.



"Speciation is a rare and difficult event that punctuates a system in homeostatic equilibrium." Homeostatic equilibrium is what creation predicts. But once the curse was introduced extinction came into play.

For the rest of you quote: Time is not the hero. If the ability is not present the desired results will not happen.

Where are the intremediates?

In the fossil record. And some still exist. Look around

The following are from a lecture I attended. My photographic skill rivals my spelling, but yo will get the point. slide number eight is particularly telling since the scientist is quoted often by our .com friends supporting evolution.

The last one wouldn't post. If you click on it you will get quite a suprise. They found the fossils over a fifteen kilometer ares. Is that the best evolution paleontolgests can do?














[img]http://i1232.photobucket.com/albums/ff364/RichCoyle/006-4.jpg[/img]

[img]http://i1232.photobucket.com/albums/ff364/RichCoyle/005-7.jpg[/img]

[img]http://i1232.photobucket.com/albums/ff364/RichCoyle/004-5.jpg[/img]

[img]http://i1232.photobucket.com/albums/ff364/RichCoyle/003-5.jpg[/img]

[img]http://i1232.photobucket.com/albums/ff364/RichCoyle/007-4.jpg[/img]

There are a few fossilized Cretaceous snakes with tiny legs. Not many, because snakes don't tend to fossilize well, but there are a few.

But you don't need the fossils, as certain strains of living lizards show the same pattern that the snake's ancestors progressed through. I'm speaking of skinks, many of whom have very tiny legs, and some have no visible limbs at all.

This skink has tiny legs:



This skink has almost completely lost its legs:


This one has:

Hawk.

Why do you reject the notion that the fossils were formed in mud under extreme pressure due to a global flood?

Because any specialist in flood geology recognizes such notions as laughable. Even before Darwin, devoutly Christian flood geologists laughed at such notions when they were proposed. They didn't believe in evolution either, but proposed instead that there were earlier creations followed by earlier floods (not mentioned in the Bible) that must explain all that ancient fauna found in ancient rocks. Of course, today, the evidence for evolution as an explanation for it is overwhelming. But the point is that even pre-Darwinian, and devoutly Christian, flood geologists thought your explanation completely ridiculous.

Do you believe there was a flood?

Yes, but not literally world-wide.

So, then not all humans today would have necessarily descended from Adam and Eve. Some could have escaped?

All humans at the time of Noah descended from Adam and Eve.

Why is that? God wiped out all of the ancestors of Adam that had no spirit...check that soul?

Herbert, Herbert Spencer is that you???

I don't recall that in the Bible.

If there was a global flood the cave paintings at Chauvet 32,000 BP, Lascaux 17,000 BP and the carvings and artifacts at Le Portel 11,00 BP weathered it quite well.
On a side note there are no dinosaurs depicted in any of the individual pieces or panels in the caves.

Me neither.

But, I was curious. Where do you draw the distinction between following the Biblical account vs the evolutionary account of Adam's earthly father with a local flood?

And, I guess a follow-up to that I was wondering if you believed that all of the inhabitants today are Noah's descendants?

Not to presuppose that you owe me any explanation or anything, mind you.