|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277 |
So, has anyone here on the Fire actually done one. A 257 WSM or 6.5 WSM that is?
Gracias
Dober
Last edited by Mark R Dobrenski; 06/10/12.
"True respect starts with the way you treat others, and it is earned over a lifetime of demonstrating kindness, honor and dignity"....Tony Dungy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,132
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,132 |
I have. Brass flow was a major problem.
Terry
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,335
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,335 |
Is it a Major problem with the 270, 7mm,300WSM's?
I have a 257WSM.
I've been so overwhelmed with fake news that I'm now nuts. Let's go Brandon
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,132
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,132 |
I have no idea about the others. My only WSM was the with .257. My experience was that it's about 200FPS slower than a .257WBY and the cases needed constant attention i.e. inside neck turning. Now if you had a chamber cut that was very generous in the neck you might not encounter the same problems I did. After playing with it for awhile I came to the conclusion it was more trouble than it was worth. I think Winchester thought the same thing.
Terry
P.S. I hope this makes sense now. It was typed on my cell phone.
Last edited by TC1; 06/10/12. Reason: terrible grammer
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,758
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,758 |
I ran a 6.5 WSM for a while. Used new Norma 270 WSM brass but never shot enough to fire the brass more than once. I got up to 3200 fps with 65 gr H1000 and the 140 gr Sierra SBT in a 26" Lilja barrel. Primers didn't look bad and bolt lift was fine but ended up backing off to 64 gr just to be sure.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,723
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,723 |
I would run a 6.5 wsm. That would be a fun rig.
Last edited by laker; 06/11/12.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,452
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,452 |
Jon Sundra did the .25 SAUM several years ago. Found better case capacity to caliber balance than with the WSM. Don't know if he still looks in here, but you might PM him and see what he found. I e-mailed him several years back, and he was very good with his reply. Don't have his e-mail any more, though. People are running the .25 Pronghorn (WSM case) with good results, though.
"Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing." Robert E. Howard
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,123 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,123 Likes: 1 |
Mark, I have been shooting a 6.5 WSM that I had Kirby Allen build in 2006.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 683
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 683 |
I have no experience with either, but a couple thoughts. I have read on this forum more than once that 140 bergers don't do so well at higher speeds with the bigger 6.5 cartridges. I believe one individual said they did best at speeds around 3000 fps and below. I think the logic was that shooting them much faster than that through the common 1:8 twist barrels was rotating them too fast...
Also, it seems from looking at load data online that the 25 wssm does pretty well already; especially with rl17 or hodgdon superformance. Would a 25 wsm be too much of a good thing? This is assuming you want a light bullet going really fast, since there are no high bc bullets in .257 that can compete with the already mentioned 6.5. A 25 wssm should be able to do 3600+ with an 80 grain barnes, or 3300+ with a 100.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 32,044
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 32,044 |
If i was going to build it would the 25 and i would use the Rem SAUM instead of the WSM case.
A Doe walks out of the woods today and says, that is the last time I'm going to do that for Two Bucks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437 |
but a couple thoughts. I have read on this forum more than once that 140 bergers don't do so well at higher speeds with the bigger 6.5 cartridges. I believe one individual said they did best at speeds around 3000 fps and below. I think the logic was that shooting them much faster than that through the common 1:8 twist barrels was rotating them too fast... As we talked.. Dober. This is the issue many have had. Over and above 3K things go to hell. The 1/4 caliber pills might hold together better. But I've not played with the 25...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277 |
Thx guys---I might just buck the system and go 270 Short Dog (as Tanner has so aptly named the WSM)
Dober
Last edited by Mark R Dobrenski; 06/12/12.
"True respect starts with the way you treat others, and it is earned over a lifetime of demonstrating kindness, honor and dignity"....Tony Dungy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 13
New Member
|
New Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 13 |
I just built a 6.5 WSM on a rem 700, Dan Peterson barrel 1/8.5 twist at 24 inch finish. I am seeing 3125 fps w/140 VLD hunting bullets, great accuracy, no jacket problems.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,086
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,086 |
I've got two PacNor Barrels one in 257-270WSM and the other in 6mm-270WSM both melonite treatred in a Kimber Montana config. Along with the reamers and go-no-go guages if anybody's interested. I have decided to go another route, got tired of waiting on redding for dies
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900 |
but a couple thoughts. I have read on this forum more than once that 140 bergers don't do so well at higher speeds with the bigger 6.5 cartridges. I believe one individual said they did best at speeds around 3000 fps and below. I think the logic was that shooting them much faster than that through the common 1:8 twist barrels was rotating them too fast... As we talked.. Dober. This is the issue many have had. Over and above 3K things go to hell. How come? Are jackets too thin?
The 280 Remington is overbore.
The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,728
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,728 |
My friend had a Rem. Model 7 in 6.5 WSM. I could have had it, but he traded it off. I love the thought of a fast twist 6.5 same or faster than a 264 Win Mag in a short action.
Drink and be merry for soldiers die for your freedoms.
Semper Fidelis!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437 |
but a couple thoughts. I have read on this forum more than once that 140 bergers don't do so well at higher speeds with the bigger 6.5 cartridges. I believe one individual said they did best at speeds around 3000 fps and below. I think the logic was that shooting them much faster than that through the common 1:8 twist barrels was rotating them too fast... As we talked.. Dober. This is the issue many have had. Over and above 3K things go to hell. How come? Are jackets too thin? Honestly I'm not sure. Although that could definitely be it. My 6.5wsm as well as many I've talked to all said above 3000ish... they wouldn't shoot.
|
|
|
|
64 members (7mm_Loco, BlackHunter, blackhawk44, aaronward9, 10gaugemag, big_g270, 6 invisible),
1,532
guests, and
850
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,557
Posts18,510,439
Members74,002
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|