Many polls samples conducted by the lib media that we hear about including those taken within the swing states which show Obama in the lead, usually contain anywhere from 7% to 10% more "DEMOCRAT" voters in their sampling. And in many cases they do not poll registered voters. They instead poll likely voters.
When you dig deep into the internals where the questions are phrased differently, the #s go down for Obama.
Direct questions such as,,,,"Do you think the country is headed in the right direction or in the wrong direction?.....Over 62% say "in the wrong direction."
Opinion of Obamacare? Even within all the swing states every poll taken shows Obamacare losing.
The lib media and the Obummer campaign are doing everything they can (pulling out all the stops so to speak) to lie about and demonize Romney as best as possible.
Obama cannot run on his record and he won`t even try.
one thing you can bank on....Romney starts with every state McCain won, and doesn't need to spend any money on them. Obama is at risk in a dozen states he won. I don't think he has a snowball's chance in hell at Fla., NC, or VA....Ohio, Pa., Wis, and even Minn. are in play. Missouri is long gone.
MN won't be in play and the twist is if Romney were to pick that twit former governor as a VP, he may lose it by more percentage points than if he hadn't...
... Popular vote means nothing if even one or two of these vital electoral college treasures slips away. And chit-fer-brains Zero knows it full well. It's why he'll not waste one moment in my state of Idaho (thank God) or others..Utah, Nebraska, Kansas etc. they mean <nothing> to him. Never have, never will. We're gun clingers and religious folk...lol.
Actually - they've been running Obama ads here in the Boise area the last couple days.
Colorado could end up being a factor. Obama is spending the last two days there for a good reason.
Last I heard, Colorado is "leaning Romney".
=======
By 5 points now,according to that Winneipac(sp) poll. Romney thumped McCain big there in '08. Obama's peeps must be worried.
When Romney announces today or tomorrow,I'm thinking Ryan,Portman or McDonnell will get the nod. This morning's talk was including Pawlenty and Christie,as well. The silence on Rubio alerted me he may still be a strong possibility,especially since Ryan left for vacation today.
If I had to lay 100 right now,Rubio,Portman and McDonnell would be my boxed 3.
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails. William Arthur Ward
It's obvious that the "new tone in Washington" messiah has chosen to put all of his eggs in the swing state baskets and he is using any smear possible to swing undecideds: "War on Women", "Bain", "Romney adds to woman's cancer woes" on and on,...the smears are endless and beyond the pale.
What say you guys? Should we be worried about this? Will it stick?
I'm getting concerned.
I'm getting concerned also. It could be that candidate Romney is playing the waiting game and folks will get fed up with the obvious lies and distortions. But...there's alway the chance that there could be a little inking planted in some minds that maybe there's some truth in it...
I remember the old anecdote about the Texas state legislator who was having difficulty in his campaign for re-election and asked Lyndon Johnson for advise for his campaign. Supposely Johnson told him to accuse his opponent of having carnal knowledge (or words to that effect) of sheep. The legislator replied that it wouldn't be true. Johnson replied that "Just get the S.O.B to deny it".
![[Linked Image]](http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e98/watch4bear/484617_182850281848158_1074276485_n.jpg)
