Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Romney's Pick Of Ryan Brings What To The Table?

.........In all honesty and based on all of your past politically related postings, you have no damn clue about alot of things!!!

You couldn`t articulate anything beyond your own feely good emotions or beyond the dimensions of your own ass...

When it comes to economics, deficit, spending and budget related issues, there is no better than Paul Ryan who can articulate those issues go on the offensive and take Obama`s dismal economic record and shove it right down Obama`s big lib and socialist throat.....

You have a clue,,,,,,,,,,,,,now.

With the money Romney has stockpiled and now his pick for VP,Offense is about to start.This is fixing to get good.

..............Yes it will. Let the offensive begin!

If the election were held just on the basis of a VP pick, Ryan would, and will kick Joe (idiot) Biden`s ass.

Here he is in his capitol hill office:


Here he is in a more comfortable office:


Looks like we have a candidate who doesn't have to pretend he's a hunter. Now he has to figure out how to hunt without all those Secret Service guys getting in the way.

Steve.

Your conclusion is not shared by political pundits. While our dismal economic state is a dominant issue, voters do not appear to have allowed it to influence their choice of candidates. Even with our abysmal economy, Obama is still leading Romney...by a long way. Polls indicate voters don't trust and like Romney and for good cause. His rapsheet will come back to haunt him, especially his implementing socialized medicine and his very recent statements that he is going to foist his version of Obamacare upon us. He just doesn't get it. I don't give a chit what type of health insurance other countries have. This is America, and I don't want any part of socialized medicine, whether it's Obamacare or Romneycare.

Worse, you're assuming our economy can be fixed and Romney is capable of fixing it. Did you watch the interview of Howard Davidowitz that I have posted? In it he de facto predicted the collapse of our economy. Short of God, I'd be surprised if it can be fixed in our immediate future.

You might want to distinguish campaign rhetoric from reality. Of course Romney is going to say that he can fix our economy. But can he? What is his plan? If it's a viable plan, why ain't Democrats buying into it? If Romney has a viable plan, why wouldn't Obama implement it thereby assuring his reelection?

I'd much prefer a candidate to tell us the truth: that we're up chit river and taking on sewage, that our economy might not be repairable within the foreseeable future; therefore we ought to make plans to become self-sufficient as Davidowitz has recommended. I am tired of BS'ing politicians lying about their abilities to deliver the goods and once given power leaving us holding empty bags.

If you really believe Romney is capable of fixing our economy, vote for him. But I ain't buying into it.

From my exposure to our economic crisis, we're in for a severe dose of austerity that is going to make Greece look prosperous. And it will last for a very long time. The Fed Reserve has had us running on illusory prosperity for a long time. Reversing that damage will require reverting to basic tenets of laissez faire and unfettered capitalism. And real prosperity from it will not be materialized overnight. It took a long time to dig the hole that's burying us. It's going to take a long time to climb out of it. No one, not Romney nor Obama, will be able to ease the pain we're fixin' to feel.

I want a politician who'll re-industrialize America and return high paying blue collar jobs to America. I want a politician who'll protect Americans' jobs even if it requires elimination of free trade. For free trade is only beneficial if it does not harm our country. One merely has to travel to the Rust Belt where houses are given away to see what free trade has done to our country. And I hate to break the news to you: Romney made hundreds of millions by engaging in free trade to the detriment of American workers. He ain't my idea of economic oracle. But if you're good with him, yank the Romney lever at your precinct.

Finally, I have never bought into the rhetoric that illegal aliens do work Americans won't. Americans don't have to do jobs they don't like because they're entitled to benefits that accord them options of not working. Take away welfare and you'll see Americans doing the very same jobs they have said that they would never do. Picking grapes for a living is a lot better than not eating. Once welfare is eliminated, we won't have need for illegal aliens. Therefore, I want a candidate who is going to take away free riders' options of not working and begin deporting aliens who have illegally entered our country. Romney ain't the candidate who's gunna take away free riders' options and deport illegal aliens. In fact, Romney ain't gunna do a damned thing to secure or borders. He lied when he said he was going to close our borders in order to dupe voters into giving him power. If he's elected he's going to leave us holding an empty secured borders bag. But if you think Romney's campaign rhetoric about securing our borders ain't rhetoric, yank the Romney lever. However, you'll have to indulge me for not sharing your belief.

bigsqueeze, you vote for the candidate whom you believe will own up to his campaign rhetoric and I'll do likewise. Who you vote for ain't none of my business.

He ought to be the Republican presidential nominee. He will invigorate voters who'll otherwise remain listless. But obviously my opinion ain't worth chit to those who have bought into the Romney illusion. However, it is apparent from recent polls and electoral college projections that my opinion is shared by a majority of voters.

That deer would not be legal in the counties I hunt.

I guess having a dink shooter beats having a non-hunter.

Maybe....

You're simply vastly ignored and come across as a bothersome gnat moments away from getting squashed.

Just move along,stupid.

Well, it would be legal in any northern state. But if you don't like it, how 'bout this one:



Steve.

Not a bowhunter myself, so this question just comes from a 'wanting to know' perspective. How wise is it to bring a broadhead to full draw in an indoors setting? Do those releases ever fail?

I shoot at a target in my basement all the time.

===========

Pelosi and Reid were working their way down the hallway.

You must think there's no way he would have a target at the other end of the room. Not sure why you'd think that. If he doesn't have a target in his office, there's really no reason to bring his bow from Wisconsin to D.C. I suggest this is evidence that he wants to stay in shooting shape so he can hunt when he goes home for the weekend.

Steve.

Only sensible thing that you have said. miles

+1

Might be splitting hairs, but it doesn't look like a broadhead to me. Kinda hard to tell though.

That's the first time I've enjoyed seeing him quoted.

It doesn't have to be that way ravioli.

You never know, the photo might have been cropped. Maybe he's aiming at Pelosi walking down the hall...

Question asked and answered. To the question about the broadhead, it certainly isn't a fixed-blade. Might be an expandable.

Steve.

RickyD,

You're one sententious megalomaniac if you even remotely believe my opinions ought to comport with yours.

You're oracle of rhetoric whose opinions are devoid of reason and logic yet loaded with emotional nonsense.

I couldn't give a chit whether you like my opinions.