|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 483
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 483 |
Does anyone know what year Remington quit putting rifle sights on the BDL in the smaller calibers?
Thanks!
Last edited by 17Hunter; 01/11/13.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 19,596 Likes: 14
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 19,596 Likes: 14 |
Didn't know they ever did. Be interested to find out though.
MAGA
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,306 Likes: 2
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,306 Likes: 2 |
I'm with him...can't remember a BDL without sights, except the varmint versions....
God knows I been wrong before though....
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 483
Campfire Member
|
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 483 |
I was thinking at some point in the 90s they stopped putting sights on some of the short actions. I know the 700 Classic varmint calibers were built without them, just not positive on the BDLs.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,306 Likes: 2
Campfire Oracle
|
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,306 Likes: 2 |
I saw some Ltd. edition BDLs made for distributors without sights....never a deuce, but it shure dont mean they're not out there....
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,970
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,970 |
Bought a triple deuce in 1998 and one in 2008.
Both had irons.....but the Classic didn't.
|
|
|
|
|
601 members (1beaver_shooter, 1936M71, 160user, 204guy, 1badf350, 65 invisible),
2,904
guests, and
1,324
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,192
Posts18,503,506
Members73,993
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
