|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 889
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 889 |
Which would make a better coyote hunting rifle out to 350 yards? The 204 would either be shooting a 39 grain sierra or a 40 grain nosler and the 223 would be shooting either a 50 grain nosler or 52 grain sierra. of course the "best answer" is neither (think .22-250)... but if you must persist in this line of thinking -- .223 rem. with heavier bullets, ie., 53, or 55 gr...
all learning is like a funnel: however, contrary to popular thought, one begins with the the narrow end. the more you progress, the more it expands into greater discovery--and the less of an audience you will have...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,804 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,804 Likes: 2 |
Molon Labe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 708
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 708 |
Which would make a better coyote hunting rifle out to 350 yards? The 204 would either be shooting a 39 grain sierra or a 40 grain nosler and the 223 would be shooting either a 50 grain nosler or 52 grain sierra. of course the "best answer" is neither (think .22-250)... but if you must persist in this line of thinking -- .223 rem. with heavier bullets, ie., 53, or 55 gr... Yep.
Isaiah 6:8
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,053 Likes: 7
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,053 Likes: 7 |
Laker: The 204 Ruger shoots much flatter and much straighter in the wind than does the 223 Remington (at the ranges you inquired regarding!). I would refer you to page 131 of the Remington 2,102 catalog where you can compare the 204 Ruger sighted in at 200 yards with 40 grain bullets and then compare the 400 yard drop to the 223 sighted in at 200 yards with the 50 grain bullet - the 204 Ruger shoots 10.2" FLATTER out there at 400 yards than that 223 offering! I often make the statement that if I were starting out in Varmint Hunting today (rather than 50 years ago!) I would only buy one caliber Rifle and one caliber ONLY for all around Varminting - and that would be in 204 Ruger! I have to date never had a Coyote survive a single hit with any of my 204 Rugers (and any of the bullets I have used)! The answer to your inquiry is 204 Ruger hands down! Remember that the 52 grain Sierra's are VERY prone to ricochet so be careful of your background. Best of luck with whichever you choose. Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,945 Likes: 19
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,945 Likes: 19 |
Heck, I sold my 22-250 after playing with the 204......
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,207
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,207 |
yeah me too. Nearly 300 coyotes later I'm not regretting my decision..
Laws aren't preventative measures. In other words, more laws won't prevent gun crime from happening.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,945 Likes: 19
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,945 Likes: 19 |
don't even miss it.......
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,878 Likes: 8
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,878 Likes: 8 |
Well currently I think the 204 is superior to the 223, only on one count....ammo and bullets are more readily available in 20 caliber vs 224 diameter...
"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC
“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,166 Likes: 9
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,166 Likes: 9 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,945 Likes: 19
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,945 Likes: 19 |
somehow, I don't believe I'd discount TR's view, either........
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,901 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,901 Likes: 1 |
Laker: The 204 Ruger shoots much flatter and much straighter in the wind than does the 223 Remington (at the ranges you inquired regarding!). I would refer you to page 131 of the Remington 2,102 catalog where you can compare the 204 Ruger sighted in at 200 yards with 40 grain bullets and then compare the 400 yard drop to the 223 sighted in at 200 yards with the 50 grain bullet - the 204 Ruger shoots 10.2" FLATTER out there at 400 yards than that 223 offering!
VarmintGuy Try the comparison using 40s in the 223 and get back to us.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,182
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,182 |
I'd never get rid of my 22-250 or my 223's for that matter but I am liking the 204 this time around. Haven't had another gun out of the safe since I got it a month or so ago.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 52
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 52 |
While one might call that thread experienced, I doubt it could be called either fair or unbiased. There will be about as many opinions as posters. Some will swear by the 204 based on their experiences, and others will swear at it based on their experiences. In either direction lots of people who are satisfied and lots who are dissatisfied with the 204. Personally I've been very satisfied with the 204 on coyotes, but I haven't shot hundreds or thousands with it. I don't expect to shoot through shoulders with it, but I do know that when I put it in the boiler room or neck that even the little 32's have tremendous stopping power on coyotes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 889
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 889 |
guys--as all of you very experienced hunters know, most anything will work--and in a few situations, i've even used the lowly .22 lr and .38 special to "power the crafty canines to the other side."
the job can be done with "most any type of reasonable rig at reasonable ranges"...
as i mentioned before, i'd take the .223 rem--with heavier bullets--over the .204, if only because i've learned firsthand how tenacious coyotes can be--and i'm not really a fan of the .223 rem. for yip dogs either, and i really like--and use--the .204 ruger, but for lesser critters...
nevertheless, my good friend bob s. (he trains many of the gov't trappers, and made his living for a time hunting coyotes), has killed a bargeload of coyotes with an 18 1/2 inch barrel .222 rem. using either 50 gr. rem. metal case bullets, or his own that he made from solid copper wire. his outer limit for that rig was about 500 yards, making nearly all one shot kills even at that range--but he has an extraordinary level of skill and experience, and the only guy that i know of personally--and have hunted with--that has more of same is my old hunting friend pat (scenarshooter).
bob liked that combo because it was light in weight, and easy on fur. so, to be sure it can be nicely done with lesser rigs...
but if someone--possibly a beginner (and of course i'm not implying that the person asking this question is a beginner), asks a question about a potentially useful caliber/rig for hunting these critters, it's usually better to advise a little more steam--rather than less, and also good to advise pills that are easier on skins, unless pelt damage is not an issue.
personally, i prefer the .22-250 rem. with 53 gr. hornady hp bullets--or the swift with the same pill, and have used the bigger cased .22cf on yotes for about 40 years now--and i've found they are about as good as it gets.
however, if i were 18 years old and starting over today, i'd get a .243 win. and drive the 65 gr. v max pill in it "till there ain't no more", which by the way, is a rig i also happen to use on occasion...and there is a hatful of other heavier pills that will also work even better if stretching things out a little farther...
the neat thing i find here on the campfire, is that there is an incredible number of very talented guys out there, and many of them have a great deal of hunting/shooting experience, as is certainly evidenced by folks here in this thread.
(regarding the 52 gr sierra hp--it can be a really accurate pill in many rigs, but if using it on yotes and hide damage is an issue--expect to buy a little more thread...)
all learning is like a funnel: however, contrary to popular thought, one begins with the the narrow end. the more you progress, the more it expands into greater discovery--and the less of an audience you will have...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,344
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,344 |
Personally I use a 20 Tac with either a 32 vmax or a 35 berger. But I really don't object to popping them with my 338 either. Shoot 'em with anything you got.
I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them.
John Wayne
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,394
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,394 |
Laker: The 204 Ruger shoots much flatter and much straighter in the wind than does the 223 Remington (at the ranges you inquired regarding!). I would refer you to page 131 of the Remington 2,102 catalog where you can compare the 204 Ruger sighted in at 200 yards with 40 grain bullets and then compare the 400 yard drop to the 223 sighted in at 200 yards with the 50 grain bullet - the 204 Ruger shoots 10.2" FLATTER out there at 400 yards than that 223 offering! 10.2" flatter at 400yds....are you nuts?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,202 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,202 Likes: 1 |
223 loaded with N135 will be 3450 fps perhaps higher depending on the barrel.
55g Sierra Blitz bombs a coyote, the lead tip blitz with N-135.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,169
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,169 |
The drop is not 10" but the 204 is far superior to the 223 its flatter less recoil less bullet drop.and everyone that says they have problem with killing a coyote with them must be afraid to admit they missed i hunt with a group in iowa and we kill anywere from 50-80 coyotes a year and alomst everyone uses a 204 and if there hit they dont get away.most are dead right there i have even killed them with and ass shot. and this is all with a lighter 32 gr v max. then people say the wind drift is so much more for most practical shooting at coyotes its within 300yds there is not gonna be a noticable difference between 223 and 204
Never trust a man in a wheel chair...with dirty shoes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,306 Likes: 2
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,306 Likes: 2 |
10.2" flatter at 400yds....are you nuts?
I'm not sure about Varmintgay's figures...he may be right. However, in any event, Yes, he's nuts.
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,553
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,553 |
I know I am going to start using my 204 for coyotes instead of my 243. Thursday I missed a coyote with the 243 that was between 25 and 30 yards away, and I know I could have hit it with a flatter shooting rifle.
Fred Not looking to get someone's guard hairs up but i just don't know what to say.
|
|
|
|
507 members (1badf350, 007FJ, 1lessdog, 160user, 22250rem, 01Foreman400, 54 invisible),
2,152
guests, and
1,107
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,240
Posts18,504,578
Members73,994
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|