|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,065
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,065 |
Defend the Constitution
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,156
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,156 |
Well, since I kinda started this whole friendly reticle argument I figure I should offer up some pictures. Please forgive the crappy pics, I'm no photographer, especially at 1 AM after a few drinks. First is the Swarovski 2.5-10x56 #4: 2.5X: 10X: Meopta 3-12x56 #4: 3X: 12X: Leupold Vari-XIII 1.75-6x32 Heavy Duplex at 4x (looks the same at all magnifications):
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 501
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 501 |
all ive used are 42 and 50mm scopes...2 of my uncles use a 3-12x56 zeiss and say that could hunt all night if they wanted....i am somewhat considering buying a 3-12x56 possibly a meopta meostar for upcoming whitetail season. was wondering if anyone else uses a 56mm scope and does it really offer a big advantage over say a 4-12x50 in lowlight because i know they are much heavier and will require tall scope rings The only adavantage you will have over other scopes with a 56mm obj. is if you turn it down to 8x. All else being equal it may have a small advantage over a 50mm obj. set at 7x or a 42mm obj, set at 6x. It comes down to what works for you. I only use 42mm obj. lens scopes to lower the (small) centre of gravity. If I shot from a stand or from a truck it wouldn't make so much of a difference. If I need max light transmission I turn it down to 6x..
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,105
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,105 |
I've used them for years without any problems at all.Excellant early morning and late evening clarity and contrast.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383 |
Well, since I kinda started this whole friendly reticle argument I figure I should offer up some pictures. Please forgive the crappy pics, I'm no photographer, especially at 1 AM after a few drinks. First is the Swarovski 2.5-10x56 #4: 2.5X: 10X: Meopta 3-12x56 #4: 3X: 12X: Leupold Vari-XIII 1.75-6x32 Heavy Duplex at 4x (looks the same at all magnifications): Great pictures thanks for posting them..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,352
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,352 |
crow hunter im from MS as well...is the reticle photo above from the meopta or is that something else? That's from a Swarovski, but the meopta is very similar. I have a 3-12x56 meopta meostar as well. Where are you located in MS? im in Raymond area. u?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,699
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,699 |
Well, since I kinda started this whole friendly reticle argument I figure I should offer up some pictures. Please forgive the crappy pics, I'm no photographer, especially at 1 AM after a few drinks. First is the Swarovski 2.5-10x56 #4: 2.5X: 10X: Meopta 3-12x56 #4: 3X: 12X: Leupold Vari-XIII 1.75-6x32 Heavy Duplex at 4x (looks the same at all magnifications): Definitely can see the advantage if using higher powers, but at the bottom end I think I would prefer the Leupold HD.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,047
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,047 |
My best scope now is my Leupold VX III 1.75-6x32 HEAVY DUPLEX that Sits on my WBY UL WT 30-06. Crow Hunter wanna sell that VARI X III 1.75-6x32 HD? It would work well on my Ruger RSI 77 7mm-08 AMRA
Molan Labe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,854
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,854 |
The only adavantage you will have over other scopes with a 56mm obj. is if you turn it down to 8x. My comparisons definitely DO NOT agree with this, AT ALL. If someone wants to see the numbers let me know. A private message works.
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,156
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,156 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527 |
I own a Meopta with a number 4 reticle. I think the inside section of reticle is actually too thin. The outside bars are bold, but the center section is like looking at fishing line. You can lose the bullseye in a dark background.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,352
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,352 |
yea ive heard that as well. the one im lookn at tho has the red dot in the middle
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 298
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 298 |
all ive used are 42 and 50mm scopes...2 of my uncles use a 3-12x56 zeiss and say that could hunt all night if they wanted....i am somewhat considering buying a 3-12x56 possibly a meopta meostar for upcoming whitetail season. was wondering if anyone else uses a 56mm scope and does it really offer a big advantage over say a 4-12x50 in lowlight because i know they are much heavier and will require tall scope rings A 56mm scope will let you see at 56 yards exactly what a 50mm scope will let you see at 50 yards and exactly what a 42mm scope will let you see at 42 yards, all else being equal scope wise. Any other way to compare different size scopes is subjective to ones eyeballs, light conditions, etc The above is half the picture. The other half is the reticle� If one can hunt all night long with a 56mm scope, I would guess he can hunt all night long with an equal quality 50mm scope, he just needs to get 1/10 of the way closer. Aic
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,058
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,058 |
Do any of you have experience on the Weaver 8x56mm?
�When in doubt, I whip it out.� Uncle Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,854
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,854 |
A 56mm scope will let you see at 56 yards exactly what a 50mm scope will let you see at 50 yards and exactly what a 42mm scope will let you see at 42 yards, all else being equal scope wise. Any other way to compare different size scopes is subjective to ones eyeballs, light conditions, etc
The above is half the picture. The other half is the reticle�
If one can hunt all night long with a 56mm scope, I would guess he can hunt all night long with an equal quality 50mm scope, he just needs to get 1/10 of the way closer.
Aic Based on side by side comparison I find this impossible to agree with.
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,015
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,015 |
Has anyone looked at the Victory 3-12x56 HT? Any comments on how it compares to the Diavari?
|
|
|
|
560 members (12344mag, 10gaugemag, 160user, 1936M71, 1234, 007FJ, 53 invisible),
2,576
guests, and
1,389
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,695
Posts18,475,163
Members73,941
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|