Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Something for the young Earth Creationists:

So what's your point?

The last of the destructive "isms" of the 19th Century loses more and more credibility by the day. Darwinism will eventually go the way of Communism and Freudism.

When I think as little of an idea as you say you do I spend no time debating or taunting its adherents. I just ignore em. They aren't worth my time.

That's because I'm pretty open to belief or unbelief and your right to it.

That's my approach cuz I know what I believe.

Yours?

If it starts threads like a troll, agitates like a troll, and writes like a troll, it's a TROLL. At least on this subject, anyway.

And your point would be?

I think he's trying to demonstrate that you can elevate douchebaggery to an art form.

Yea, this was a troll post.

To all you reasonable moderates out there....Sorry couldn't resist. Should of been titled for the Young Earth Creationist.

We live in a country where we are free to believe or not believe as we choose.

I have not tried to antagonize you or call you out for your beliefs, why do you feel the need to deny me the same?

I could not care less if you believe in the great pumpkin or choose to hold dear to your own toe nail clippings. Please allow me to believe in God.

I'm a young earth (old religion) creationist.

After all, we are endowed by our CREATOR, certain inalienable rights.

I guess if you don't connoiter such you should quit posting First Amendment rights and go straight to hell or muzzie....

How do you get from this:

20:3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
20:4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
20:5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;

To this:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

??

Were you born a complete azz or has it taken lots of practice?

I see you changed the subject of your OP but still will not give me the courtesy of a reply.

How young?

Dinosaurs running around with Moses young?

I think what he means is; if you think there is no God then your rights came from the Gov. so dont bitch when the Gov. takes them away.

Pretty simple. To me, as an American, it makes total sense.

If you don't believe in a Creator, where do your endowed rights come from? If you demand the exercise of rights, why do you not demand the existence of the source?

How do you only have Christian scripture to quote, or is that by pure accident? (None of which is in any volition of Christian faith or volition of any American citizen, by fiat).

You should really analyze what you have just posted, and think maybe 1942; it could even be 1813......

Weather they are God given or not, .gov is trying to take them away, and with every .gov success we have no one to blame but ourselves....

No, I don't.

But it sure seems a lot of statists wish it to be so......

Maybe they'll "get religion" when they get their wishes.

antelope_sniper,

From what I heard in a lecture the science community originally rejected Darwin's theory but the church wrapped loving arms around it. He is buried in a church in England!

I'm glad to know your confusion of the weather is akin to "whether or nots".

Every .gov "success" is banked upon the inability of sources to alone acknowledge, let alone spell and enunciate the general "WTF" we are talking about.

Don't ever confuse .gov with "We The People"; at least know how to distinguish such.

You want blame?

"Weather they are God given or not" pretty much spells (and misspells) the doubt and idiocy from which your lack of conviction and any form of solid ground is based.

KMA, but your "representation" is a joke since you have no basis, historical or personal, in anything you are arguing for or about...

I'd tell you to get some religion, but your desire to expound on behalf of its benefits far outweighs your understanding of its source.

You practice the right, yet you loathe its source....

Stellar.