24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 90
Chaser1 Offline OP
Campfire Greenhorn
OP Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 90
new Pentax WP for Christmas ,first try.[Linked Image] [Linked Image] and this on from my old Sony MVC FD91[Linked Image] Anyone have the WP and can give any feed back. pros VS cons? --Jim--


"AMERICANS Used To ROAR Like LIONS For LIBERTY,- NOW They BLEAT Like SHEEP
For SECURITY."-_Norman Vincent Peale-____________________REMEMBER. "SECURITY
WITHOUT LIBERTY Is Called PRISON."---J.L.W
GB1

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,645
BW Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,645
Hello Chaser,

Nice scenery! Thanks for sharing!

You asked for some input, so if I may be so bold, I'll share some. Although not before saying that I'm no photographer myself, but am in the process of trying to improve my picture taking skills.

So here goes...

The first picture looks a little blurry. I do that all the time too! For every focused picture I take, there's usually 4-5 blurry ones that are wasted. Thank goodness for digital!

Are you shooting in 'landscape' mode? I use landscape mode alot, if for no other reason than it turns off the flash. Then again, the 'blurriness' could be from resizing the picture to fit here in the forum.

The second picture looks a bit 'old' for some reason.

I really like the third picture! Your older camera really caught the light correctly that time. Having part of the nearby tree in the upper right-hand corner really helped me get a sense of distance. Plus the sun rays streaming down look great.

I've read (here) that having a bit of something in the foreground is important. That the rule works very well with the tree in the 3rd picture, but not so well (just to me) with the grass in the 2nd picture. Not sure what you could have done there. Maybe zoom in, but lose some of those cool clouds, or get closer to the edge of the water?

One other thing, which I'm very guilty of, is the water level is off. Many of my pictures are of water, and I can't seem to get a level shot to save my life. One of these days I'm going to buy a photo-editting program which will allow me to rotate my pictures so the ocean isn't running uphill. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />

Sure hope I haven't run ya off! I've been reading other photography related websites lately, and have gotten a bit used to the type of critiques those guys share. Too bad I haven't applied any of that myself. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />


Brian

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,262
Elf Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,262
nice pics. BW had some sound advice for you. Practice ,practice,practice and like he said with Digital you can delete what you don't like and try again. Keep posting.

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,696
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,696
I have microsoft photo editor (came on the computer) and you can adjust the rotation of the picture by degree, + or -. That would help with the slight tilt of the water level. I, too, delete way more pictures than I keep and I take way more than I used to because the digital has that "instant gratification" thing going for it. The learning curve is steep for me, and I love not having to pay for have film developed.
M


My Next Husband Will Be Normal- T. Shirt
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 90
Chaser1 Offline OP
Campfire Greenhorn
OP Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 90
Quote
Hello Chaser,

Nice scenery! Thanks for sharing!

You asked for some input, so if I may be so bold, I'll share some. Although not before saying that I'm no photographer myself, but am in the process of trying to improve my picture taking skills.

So here goes...

The first picture looks a little blurry. I do that all the time too! For every focused picture I take, there's usually 4-5 blurry ones that are wasted. Thank goodness for digital!

Are you shooting in 'landscape' mode? I use landscape mode alot, if for no other reason than it turns off the flash. Then again, the 'blurriness' could be from resizing the picture to fit here in the forum.

The second picture looks a bit 'old' for some reason.

I really like the third picture! Your older camera really caught the light correctly that time. Having part of the nearby tree in the upper right-hand corner really helped me get a sense of distance. Plus the sun rays streaming down look great.

I've read (here) that having a bit of something in the foreground is important. That the rule works very well with the tree in the 3rd picture, but not so well (just to me) with the grass in the 2nd picture. Not sure what you could have done there. Maybe zoom in, but lose some of those cool clouds, or get closer to the edge of the water?

One other thing, which I'm very guilty of, is the water level is off. Many of my pictures are of water, and I can't seem to get a level shot to save my life. One of these days I'm going to buy a photo-editting program which will allow me to rotate my pictures so the ocean isn't running uphill. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />

Sure hope I haven't run ya off! I've been reading other photography related websites lately, and have gotten a bit used to the type of critiques those guys share. Too bad I haven't applied any of that myself. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
Thanks for the input. the blurryness must be from the resizing, on the first one , I do use the landscape mode or they do seem to get out of focuse. I was surprised that in the low light the first one did as well as it did. Those were shot in the 3 mga pix. setting except for the last one with the Sony MVCFD91 . that camera is only a 0.8 megapix , camera But it has a full sized lense with 14X opitical zoom. It much more like the old full size SLRs I have. I think the compactness of the /WP make some compromises on quality.If I ever get enough money together I'll look at a Dig SLR. the layout of the river bank didn't allow me to capture anything up close to accent the depth in the first two. Your right it makes a world of difference if you can compose your shot more so as I was able to in the last one. As for the river water level ,My guess as to why thats such a hassle is the LCD rather than the viewfinder.You don't get the steady hold and view to actually see as well what your shooting with out the viewfinder window. I also delete at least half of my takes. The WP was purchased for hunting /fishing and kayaking use.I just wanted some thing I could take on the water and not have it destroyed. THX. for the input. no offense taken .--Jim--


"AMERICANS Used To ROAR Like LIONS For LIBERTY,- NOW They BLEAT Like SHEEP
For SECURITY."-_Norman Vincent Peale-____________________REMEMBER. "SECURITY
WITHOUT LIBERTY Is Called PRISON."---J.L.W
IC B2


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

578 members (12344mag, 219 Wasp, 17CalFan, 1Longbow, 06hunter59, 257 roberts, 55 invisible), 1,868 guests, and 1,290 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,194,279
Posts18,525,570
Members74,031
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.077s Queries: 23 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8271 MB (Peak: 0.8639 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-20 21:28:35 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS