24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 2
C
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 2
Gents, I have an excellent load for my 25-06 using 100 grain barnes TTSX. I was able to find a great buy on some 100 grain TSX bullets , and was wondering if any of you have done side by side comparisons between the two? I certainly don't expect them to be exactly the same, but I would expect they'd at least shoot similar to each other.

HR IC

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,499
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,499
My 2 cents, I would stick with the TTSX. I tried the 100 TSX in a 257 Wby. Very accurate, no complaints there. Shot 3 antelope with them. Lopes usually fold where they stand when hit good. With the TSX, there was no reaction to the shot, 2 just stood there and one ran about 50 yards. All 3 were hit broadside behind the shoulder. They all died, just not what I was used to with antelope.

There wasn't a whole lot of internal damage, and the exit hole wasn't all that impressive. Granted, I don't shoot bone on lopes if I can avoid it. I am sure others will chime in here soon calling me an idiot for not busting shoulders. I don't see a point doing it with antelope, since there isn't much cover for them to run off into.

I did shoot the TTSX in a 308 Norma Mag, used it on antelope, and it was a dramatic difference. Those goats dropped at the shot, internal damage was more like a C&C bullet and none of the 4 took a single step. All but one were hit broadside, behind the shoulder. Not the best comparison in regard to caliber. Some state that the smaller caliber TSX need to hit bone to show better expansion.


There is no way to coexist no matter how many bumper stickers there are on Subaru bumpers!

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,307
Likes: 2
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,307
Likes: 2
I never experienced a failure to open on a TSX but enough guys here that I actually listen to and trust, could provide proof that they had experienced failures, so I switched to TTSXs and have never had an issue, nor have I heard of any issues out of the choir of trustworthy naysayers...


"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,541
Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,541
Likes: 2
I haven't tried the TTSX in my .243, yet.

I'm still using up my TSXs, and having ordered more, I'll be using them at least another year.

I have not had one not kill a deer. Nor have I failed to get an exit, even at the rather close ranges I get to shoot deer, deliberately going for bone, which is turning out to be a different story with a typical C&C bullet in that cartridge.

Right now, and in the .243, the only thing I would consider other than the TSX would be a TTSX or either a 95 or 100 grain Partition, and I fully intend to give at the TTSX a try and pick the most accurate one between the two (TSX or TTSX).

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,019
Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,019
Likes: 1
I have used TSX for years with no problem but they were all 308 cal and above. There are stories of TSX not opening but as far as I have heard, they were all with smaller diameters. I think the TTSX gives more reliable expansion and I am switching over as I run out of TSX. If I had a bunch of TSX (and I do) I would certainly use them up.


I am continually astounded at how quickly people make up their minds on little evidence or none at all.
Jack O'Connor
IC B2

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,739
Likes: 1
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,739
Likes: 1
My 25-06 is being a picky bitch about giving me both the velocity and groups that I want with both the TTSX and the TSX 100s. Have killed quite a few deer with 243s and both TSX and TTSX and 270s with TSX and TTSX. I couldn't see the slightest difference in performance. Same with calibers further away from 25-06. For my money, all the holes I've made and seen in deer with X, TSX and TTSX bullets look the same. No way would I try to guess caliber, much less X or TSX or TTSX based on looking at the wound.

I shot a 200 lb+ doe a few weeks ago with a .223 and a TSX 53 grain. The bullet passed through the muscle of the off side shoulder on the way out (no bone) and made a 3 inch hole. More or less what I have seen out of my 300 WM.

As far as loading differences, you have to expect seating depth differences to get accuracy. You may not have to seat different, but expect it. Otherwise I don't remember and powder/charge weight differences necessary for any of the rifles I have used both in.

Last edited by MILES58; 12/09/13.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 17,295
Likes: 5
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 17,295
Likes: 5
TTSX all the way. Never had a failure with them or seen one.


https://thehandloadinglog.wordpress.com
μολὼν λαβέ

"Weatherby was too long so I nicknamed it "Bee""
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 2
I tried a 168 TSX bullet on a hog hunt in Georgia. Shot was approximately 130ish yards? The pig was around 125lbs. At the shot the guide said the pig hunched up and ran off into the palmettos. I put the crosshairs on the shoulder of the hog as he quartered to the right. We found bone shards and and a little blood. Followed the on and off blood trail for a good 1 1/2 until it was lost it and dark approached. It was my only experience with the TSX and could have happened with any other bullet but it put me off of the TSX enough to not use it again! I did buy some TTSX's for my 7mm-08 so hoping the results on game is better than that one pig.

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,742
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,742
Originally Posted by Esox357
I tried a 168 TSX bullet on a hog hunt in Georgia. Shot was approximately 130ish yards? Th
what caliber? in 308, 30/06 i wouldnt go higher than a 130 TTSX and drive as fast as possible


"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered."
― George Orwell, 1984
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 17,295
Likes: 5
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 17,295
Likes: 5
Even with a 308 shooting the 168 at 2700 fps and an impact velocity of over 2500 fps.......

That should have worked.....


https://thehandloadinglog.wordpress.com
μολὼν λαβέ

"Weatherby was too long so I nicknamed it "Bee""
IC B3

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 2
30.06

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 17,295
Likes: 5
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 17,295
Likes: 5
so about 2800 fps muzzle 2600 impact........

that's bad business.


https://thehandloadinglog.wordpress.com
μολὼν λαβέ

"Weatherby was too long so I nicknamed it "Bee""
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 2
How so?

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,019
Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,019
Likes: 1
I can see why you would question a bullet's effectiveness after losing the first animal you shot with one but 1 animal certainly doesn't make a trend. My experience with them has been excellent over the last 25 years on game from warthogs to elk and calibers from 223 to 375. Probably 75 head of game with the vast majority DRT. YMMV.


I am continually astounded at how quickly people make up their minds on little evidence or none at all.
Jack O'Connor
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 2
Your correct blacktailer, but I was not impressed on a "pay" hunt to lose the only shot I had.

I decided to try the Barnes TSX for the first time since they shot incredibly well (3 touching at 100yards cloverleaf configuration).

But decided to jump back to the 165 Hornady BTSP and Nosler Ballistic Tips which I have yet to not find an animal. The blood trail and bone fragments tend to make me think I hit him high. But the blood trail/lack of blood appeared the bullet had "penciled" through like a FMJ would?

I'm hoping the TTSX will prove to be better but think I will stick with Nosler Partitions and Hornady bullets in the 06.

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,019
Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,019
Likes: 1
No flies on either of those.


I am continually astounded at how quickly people make up their minds on little evidence or none at all.
Jack O'Connor
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 2
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 2
I had excellent performance on two African hunts with TSX bullets in my .375 RUM. The first hunt with 300 gr bullets and the second hunt with 270 gr TSX bullets.

I also had excellent performance with 168 gr TSX bullets from my .300 Weatherby on 3 Texas exotics and one Montana bull elk. Just before I went to South Africa in 2012 I tried 168 gr TTSX bullets in my .300 Weatherby. They grouped slightly tighter than the 168 gr TSX bullets, so I took them on that trip. They also performed superbly on that hunt as another one did on this years bull elk.

That made 10 for 10 one shot DRT kills with my .300 Weatherby and 168 gr TSX/TTSX bullets. I can't do better than that.


SAVE 200 ELK, KILL A WOLF

NRA Endowment Life Member

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 534
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 534
their is a 110 TTSX in .308 that has me wondering what i could launch it out of my 308 win....

im thinking 3300 potentially and im betting it would work well...only issue is the BC sucks so it would be a shorter range load.... for woods hunting inside of 200 yards or so it might create quite an impact with that frontal area at that speed

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 2
I know some guys swear by the TTSX 130 grain out of a .308 at 3000 fps?

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 24,716
Likes: 27
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 24,716
Likes: 27
Originally Posted by DAMARA
their is a 110 TTSX in .308 that has me wondering what i could launch it out of my 308 win....

im thinking 3300 potentially and im betting it would work well...only issue is the BC sucks so it would be a shorter range load.... for woods hunting inside of 200 yards or so it might create quite an impact with that frontal area at that speed

================================================================

Barnes load data show two loads for the 308win fastest is upper 3500 using A-2230 powder.
3511 fps with varget being more accurate.

--------------------------------------------------------------

130 barnes load over 3200fps.


PRESIDENT TRUMP 2024/2028 !!!!!!!!!!


Posted by Bristoe
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

567 members (257Bob, 270wsmnutt, 160user, 257 roberts, 1lessdog, 1_deuce, 59 invisible), 2,528 guests, and 1,216 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,194,366
Posts18,527,291
Members74,031
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.150s Queries: 54 (0.025s) Memory: 0.9073 MB (Peak: 1.0057 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-21 16:21:44 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS