|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972 |
I have a Kahles 2-7X36 I'm about to put on my new Kimber Montana in 7mm-08. The list below are the only light weight options I can think of. have I missed any better choices.
Leupold fixed 4X Leupold fixed 6x Leupold VX3 2.5-8 Swaro Z3 3X9X36
I also have a USA Divari 3X9X36 on another rifle but I am loath to pull it off as I don't see that much improvement over the Kahles I am considering mounting.
Basically just wondering if there is some choice I missed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,166
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,166 |
Leupold VX2 2-7x. Lighter than the 2.5-8x.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,787 Likes: 6
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,787 Likes: 6 |
Leupold VX2 2-7x. Lighter than the 2.5-8x. The 2-7, 4x, and 6x36 are my favorites if counting oz's. I usually go with the 6x42 as it's only a couple of oz's more. None of those are bad choices (pending power you're comfortable with).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972 |
Leupold VX2 2-7x. Lighter than the 2.5-8x. Yea, It's 2 OZ lighter than the Kahles I am mounting and it comes with CDS as an option. I still think the Kahles will have better glass. What do you think?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,062
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,062 |
I would defiantly go with the Kahles if I already had it. If not I like the Swarovski z3
"If you got it, you got it!" In memory of Pops, gone but never forgotten
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972 |
I would defiantly go with the Kahles if I already had it. If not I like the Swarovski z3 Have you had personal experience with the Z3? I was strongly considering getting one but researching them, I found numerous complaints of them loosing zero.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,933 Likes: 23
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,933 Likes: 23 |
Get something with the size you want, low weight, and good eye relief characteristics.
Yesterday I was shooting at 300 yards using a little Leupold 1.5-4x20 set to 4x, which actually gives 3.9x. I shot four, three shot groups for an average of 0.43 MOA. Yes, 0.43, that's not a typo. The worst group was 0.6 MOA.
It doesn't take nearly as much glass as I used to think to get the job done.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,807
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,807 |
The Kahles is the best scope you list if it will fit. It's ocular may be larger than the others.
The Swaro.3-9 is no better than a Leupold except it's name. It costs way too much otherwise.
If it's not too small the Leupold 3-9 Compact was pretty good today when I shot it on a rifle where it's about the only one that will fit using that mount and bolt clearance. It's 9.4 oz.
I could see bullet holes at 100 & 200 yds.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972 |
I have some mounts ordered so I'll see soon how the Kahles fits. If nothing else I have a pristine M8 4X but I wanted something really nice on this rifle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,051
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,051 |
Hi there, randy I did the z3 on my Montana it's 12 Oz, balances very well on my 308, that's my choice, there r many to choice from! Have fun.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,563
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,563 |
Have two Swarovski PH 6x42s. They weigh in at 12 oz. They're tough to find but I love them as a lightweight scope. Sold my FX3 6x42s to go with the PHs.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,062
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,062 |
I would defiantly go with the Kahles if I already had it. If not I like the Swarovski z3 Have you had personal experience with the Z3? I was strongly considering getting one but researching them, I found numerous complaints of them loosing zero. Yes sir I had a 4-12 z3 with the BT. It tracked right and never zerod it but one time. I did dial it quit a bit before selling it to get the z5. Only reason I sold it was to get the 5-25. I did like the reticle in the z3 better as it was heavier. As to the comparison to the leaupold, I have never looked through a leaupold that was close to a Swarovski. Maybe just my eyes but the Swarovski is way above the leaupold.
"If you got it, you got it!" In memory of Pops, gone but never forgotten
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 735
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 735 |
If it's about weight I'd go with a 6x36 with the ballistic dot reticle. That will give you sighting to 500 yards without having to resort to weightier setups.
Personally I went with the 6x42 ballistic dot pled and have been hugely impressed.
Hunt Africa while you can
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,170 Likes: 5
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,170 Likes: 5 |
I have a Kahles 2-7X36 I'm about to put on my new Kimber Montana in 7mm-08. The list below are the only light weight options I can think of. have I missed any better choices.
Leupold fixed 4X Leupold fixed 6x Leupold VX3 2.5-8 Swaro Z3 3X9X36
I also have a USA Divari 3X9X36 on another rifle but I am loath to pull it off as I don't see that much improvement over the Kahles I am considering mounting.
Basically just wondering if there is some choice I missed. Have you looked at the Ultralight scopes from Leupold?
Life Member SCI Life Member DSC Member New Mexico Shooting Sports Association
Take your responsibilities seriously, never yourself-Ken Howell Proper bullet placement + sufficient penetration = quick, clean kill. Finn Aagard
Ken
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,832 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,832 Likes: 3 |
The Leopold 3x (actually around 3.4)and the 1.5x5.
Last edited by battue; 04/11/14.
laissez les bons temps rouler
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,678 Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,678 Likes: 2 |
IIRC, part of the reason you were getting this rifle was for the kids and wife to use. In my limited experience with my boys, the less to fiddle with the better. Therefore, I'd be looking hard at a fixed power scope, with my suggestion being a 6X of whatever make/model you prefer.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,832 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,832 Likes: 3 |
Leupold 3x on a Montana: 3x on a Nula: Leupold 1.5-5 on a Model 70: Leuipold 3x on the same Model 70:
laissez les bons temps rouler
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972 |
IIRC, part of the reason you were getting this rifle was for the kids and wife to use. In my limited experience with my boys, the less to fiddle with the better. Therefore, I'd be looking hard at a fixed power scope, with my suggestion being a 6X of whatever make/model you prefer. Yea, that's been a top runner and it will likely get one in the end. The Leupold 6X36 at 10 0z in talley LW extra lows woyld be hard to beat.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884 |
Leupold 2.5 is the lightest.
The Leupold 4x rimfire is next, and can be used just fine for a centerfire.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,364 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,364 Likes: 1 |
Those 3x's look just right on those. Thought about an M1 on one, see you did it. How far out have you shot that rig? I have never owned the 2.5x, but like my only 3x a lot.
|
|
|
|
623 members (10gaugemag, 12344mag, 1100mag, 10gaugeman, 01Foreman400, 64 invisible),
18,983
guests, and
1,380
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,981
Posts18,540,068
Members74,053
|
Most Online21,066
|
|
|
|