Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire What's wrong with church

I can see the difference in a man and an ape and they aren't the same.

Your family evidently descended from apes, not mine.

just asking, if an ape and a space alien hybridized (that means they bred with each other), did a human off-spring result?

I know mules, zebra's, horses, donkeys and whatever else makes for some interesting discussion. but monkeys being raped by an extra-terrestrial, please say it ain't so.

I am guessing here but maybe ET used the ocean a couple billion years ago as a pizz stop and sowed the seeds of life.

I am guessing here but maybe ET used the ocean a couple billion years ago as a pizz stop and sowed the seeds of life.

who gave humans fire, down here on the Earthen?
I mean, without fire, or food would have to be eaten raw, wouldn't it?

raw food? whose fault is that?

This morning I decided to do a little checking on BING to see if I could find something about the earth's magnetic field by someone I respect more than an internet blogger. I found the following. This is just the first paragraph of his paper.




"The Earth�s Magnetic Field is Still Losing Energy
D. Russell Humphreys
CRSQ Vol 39 No 1 pp 1-11 June 2002
ABSTRACT
This paper closes a loophole in the case for a young earth based on the loss of energy from various parts of the earth�s magnetic field. Using ambiguous 1967 data, evolutionists had claimed that energy gains in minor (�non-dipole�) parts compensate for the energy loss from the main (�dipole�) part. However, nobody seems to have checked that claim with newer, more accurate data. Using data from the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) I show that from 1970 to 2000, the dipole part of the field steadily lost 235 � 5 billion megajoules of energy, while the non-dipole part gained only 129 � 8 billion megajoules. Over that 30-year period, the net loss of energy from all observable parts of the field was 1.41 � 0.16 %. At that rate, the field would lose half its energy every 1465 � 166 years. Combined with my 1990 theory explaining reversals of polarity during the Genesis Flood and intensity fluctuations after that, these new data support the creationist model: the field has rapidly and continuously lost energy ever since God created it about 6,000 years ago."

You don't see a difference in a anonomous blogger and a Ph.D scientist? Did you take a moment to check his crdentials? I heard this author in lecture and read his books. He is the scienctist who figured out why the space craft are slowing down when they go past Pluto's orbit.

Secularists are terrified or flat out hate, take your pick, by those with faith, even though medical science often legitimizes faith by tells us it has definite healing properties.

I could be wrong, but you may be over thinking this. Have you ever believed in something that you cannot fully understand or logically explain?

Nice try Ringman. But you obviously need to go back and read my post again becasue nowhere in it did I question his education.

What I said was, his findings weren't published in a refereed scientific journal.

You didn't do your homework. He has been been published in peer reviewed publications.

Published in the Creation Research Society Quarterly. I notice his article wasn't published in a reputable journal

No, that was Newton.