Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire What's wrong with church

Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny...

DF

phylogeny: (noun) the development over time of a species, genus, or group, as contrasted with the development of an individual ( ontogeny )

Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny, also known as "Biogenetic Law" is not a "Law" of Science at all. It is only a theory.

A theory that was proven wrong many years ago.

Despite this, it still remains in many of your children�s Public school textbooks. And in many it is still taught as a fact.

Agree with your analysis of a popular theory.

DF

Show me a modern biology textbook that still contains haeckel's drawing or teachs recapitulation theory.

laffin'

You post as much pure unadulterated BS on this board as anybody. More than most. You say things based on what you want them to be instead of what they are. Now you're calling evolutionary science "propaganda"...?!?!

After doctoring facts to fit your agenda, as antelope sniper has time and again pointedly demonstrated...you have the audacity to continue doin' it...!

really laffin'

Didn't take long to find these on line.

DF

I. Peter H Raven & George B Johnson, Biology (5th ed, McGraw Hill, 1999)*

II. Peter H Raven & George B Johnson, Biology (6th ed, McGraw Hill, 2002)*

III. Textbook III. Douglas J. Futuyma, Evolutionary Biology (3rd ed, Sinauer, 1998)

IV. Cecie Starr and Ralph Taggart, Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life (8th ed, Wadsworth, 1998)

V. Joseph Raver, Biology: Patterns and Processes of Life (J.M.Lebel, 2004, draft version presented to the Texas State Board of Education for approval in 2003)

VI. Cecie Starr and Ralph Taggart, Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life (Wadsworth, 2004, draft version presented to the Texas State Board of Education in 2003)

VII. William D. Schraer and Herbert J. Stoltze, Biology: The Study of Life (7th ed, Prentice Hall, 1999)

VIII. Michael Padilla et al., Focus on Life Science: California Edition (Prentice Hall, 2001)

IX. Kenneth R Miller & Joseph Levine, Biology: The Living Science (Prentice Hall, 1998)

X. Kenneth R Miller & Joseph Levine, Biology (4th ed., Prentice Hall, 1998)

antlers,

See the post below the one I am responding to and tell me again about B.S.

The Miller books were updated 15 years ago, in 1998. In addition his books never used any of Haeckel's actual drawings.

http://www.millerandlevine.com/km/evol/embryos/Haeckel.html

Evolution facts are rife with Mulligans. Just sayin.

This thing is still going, huh?

The irony of this thread has me LMAO!

BADA-BA-BA-BA....I'm loving it!

What about the others?

DF

Nice try again Ringman. But that's not what I was talking about, and you know it. Don't you get tired of twisting the truth?

I'm sure he's been published. But I'm talking about his findings that you quoted. You know, the ones about the earth being 6000 years old.

Show me those, in a refereed journal.

Seems none consider that not only did the immaculate explosion that created an amoeba also morphed into trees.

Even with proper grammar that wouldn't make sense.

I don't know it. I don't know what you are talking about.



What about his work showing the creation is about 6,000 years old? What are you asking?



"Comparison of experimental results and calculated detector responses for PBFA II Selected thermal source experiments," Review of Scientific Instruments 63 (October 1992) No. 10.
"Inertial confinement fusion with light ion beams," 13th Internat. Conf. on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Washington, D.C. 1-6, October, 1990.
"Reducing aspect ratios in inertial confinement fusion targets," JOWOG 37 Conference, Albuquerque, NM, January 1990. (Contents classified).
"Progress Toward a Superconducting Opening Switch," Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE Pulsed Power Conference, Arlington, Virginia, 1987, pp. 279-282.
"Scaling relations for the Rimfire multi-stage gas switch," Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE Pulsed Power Conference, Arlington, VA, June 29 - August 1, 1987.
"Rimfire: A Six Megavolt Laser-Triggered Gas-Filled Switch for PBFA-II," Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE Pulsed Power Conference, Arlington, Virginia, June 10-12, 1985, pp. 262-269.
"PBFA II, a 100 TW pulsed power driver for the inertial confinement fusion program," Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE Pulsed Power Conference, Arlington, Virginia, June 10-12, 1985.
"Uranium Logging with Prompt Fission Neutrons," International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 34 (1983) 261-268.
"Uranium logging with prompt fission neutrons," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, NS-28 (1981) 1691-1695.
"Pulsed neutron gamma ray logging for minerals associated with uranium," 6th Conf. on Small Accelerators in Research and Industry, Denton, TX, November 3-5, 1980. Sandia National Laboratories document no. SAND80-1531.
"Wide-range multi-channel analog switch," Nuclear Instruments and Methods 121 (1974) 505-508.
"The 1/g Velocity Dependence of Nucleon-Nucleus Optical Potentials," Nuclear Physics A182 (1972) 580.
"Studies of hadron interactions at energies around 10 TeV using an ionization spectrometer-emulsion chamber combination," Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Cosmic Rays, Budapest 1969, in Acta Physica Acad. Sci. Hungaricae 29 (1970) 497-503.
"Wide-Range multi-input pulse height recording system," Review of Scientific Instruments 38 (1967) 1123-1127.
Creationwiki biography portal.png
Browse
Helium diffusion rates support accelerated nuclear decay by D. Russell Humphreys, Ph.D., Steven A. Austin, Ph.D., John R. Baumgardner, Ph.D., and Andrew A. Snelling, Ph.D. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Creationism, R. L. Ivey (Ed.), pp. 175�195, 2003.

Ringman, as I said, I don't doubt the guy has been published.

So you've demonstrated something that wasn't in doubt.

Here's my question (again) so pay attention:

Which one of the articles you listed supports a 6,000 year-old earth?

Also just so we're clear on this, a quick perusal of your list includes papers presented at conferences.

I've presented papers at conferences. They are not peer reviewed, and they are not refereed journals.

You apparently don't understand the difference in presenting a paper at a conference, and publishing a paper in refereed journal.

When you present a paper at a conference, it's the first look your peers get at it. Most papers presented at a conference are only preceded by an abstract.

Smoke, what do they say resulted in life. Trees and grass are forms of life conveniently left out of the explanations for evolution. It's not really too difficult to grasp that truth.

Got to go. God bless.

eyeball: I don' think they were left out. Good night.