|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 18,667 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 18,667 Likes: 1 |
What is the difference between a recurve and a semi-recurve?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,389 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,389 Likes: 6 |
A semi-recurve is just that...the limbs are partially recurved in stead of fully. It's an old term from the 50s-60s that's no longer used. Today, they're call hybrid longbows.
I'll dig up a vid of Johnny Carson shooting a semi-recurve Bear Polar in the late 50s. Notice that the string doesn't touch the limb when braced.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,389 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,389 Likes: 6 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 18,667 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 18,667 Likes: 1 |
I wish I could see them side by side, strung and unstrung. One thing is for sure, that doesn't look like my recurve.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,339
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,339 |
A semi-recurve is just that...the limbs are partially recurved in stead of fully. It's an old term from the 50s-60s that's no longer used. Today, they're call hybrid longbows.
Yep.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,776
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,776 |
Great Clip - Sponsored by Winston, and shooting an apple off someone's head on TV. Yes sir, the times have changed!
FWIW I did own one of those Polars for a while, nothing special to me and I sold it.
Last edited by centershot; 08/15/14.
A true sportsman counts his achievements in proportion to the effort involved and fairness of the sport. - S. Pope
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,389 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,389 Likes: 6 |
The other thing I should mention is that on a semi-recurve like the Bear Polar or a modern hybrid longbow the limbs are narrower and thicker than on a recurve. They are also usually 'trapped' which means they are trapezoids in their shape.
I've got a 1955 Polar and it's exceedingly quiet and pretty snappy, with a fast flight type string. With a b50 string it's fairly sluggish.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,776
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,776 |
Think those old tips will hold up to a FF string? Some guys have good luck with it, others have broken bows with the vintage stuff.
A true sportsman counts his achievements in proportion to the effort involved and fairness of the sport. - S. Pope
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972 |
Think those old tips will hold up to a FF string? Some guys have good luck with it, others have broken bows with the vintage stuff. I shoot my selfbows with no stretch material padded at the tips. However some of those old bows don't have tips designed as well as my selfbows. I wouldn't use a thin endless loop with a hard serving but I wouldn't fear a good flemish twist padded well at the tips. Just use at least 9 grains per pound of arrow weight on those older bows. I would be more concerned about a too light arrow than a good non stretch string.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,389 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,389 Likes: 6 |
As long as the string grooves aren't too sharp and shaped decently, I think the risk of catastrophic failure on any vintage bow due to the use of FF strings is very low.
A lot of people advocate padding the loops with B50, but I doubt it's even necessary as long as they're thick enough so as to not start sawing into the limb.
It's pretty amazing how those old bows shoot with a decent string. I'd put my '64 Kodiak up against any modern recurve and come out just fine....and yes I own a pro-chrono and use it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972 |
As long as the string grooves aren't too sharp and shaped decently, I think the risk of catastrophic failure on any vintage bow due to the use of FF strings is very low.
A lot of people advocate padding the loops with B50, but I doubt it's even necessary as long as they're thick enough so as to not start sawing into the limb.
It's pretty amazing how those old bows shoot with a decent string. I'd put my '64 Kodiak up against any modern recurve and come out just fine....and yes I own a pro-chrono and use it. Agreed. I am mostly concerned about padded flemish lops when string groves look like notches cut into a thin flat limb.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,676
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,676 |
It was not cutting it was the lack of stretch in the string that hurt old bows. The string absorbed energy. New material doesn't.
|
|
|
|
654 members (12344mag, 16gage, 10gaugemag, 160user, 06hunter59, 12savage, 61 invisible),
2,900
guests, and
1,318
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,643
Posts18,512,351
Members74,010
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|