|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 435
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 435 |
OK I give up. I'm being over run by pests. OK not over run but enough I want to be able to hit them.
After doing several hours of research I believe I want to go with a RWS 34. Now which one. Regular compact etc. of course let's not forget .177 or 22.
I will be shooting critters in the yard while we have 1.5 acres we do have neighbors I felt the 34 would be better than something like the 350 etc. My Crosman was a .177 and it never failed to kill if it hit them.
Last edited by ramrod340; 10/03/14.
Just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,608
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,608 |
I suggest a 22lr rifle and shoot CB Longs if your concerned about noise.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,422
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,422 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 435
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 435 |
I've never had what I would call acceptable accuracy with cbs
Just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,193
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,193 |
I have a Chinese made Crosman version of the 34 in .177 caliber and use it for pigeons in a friend's barn and chipmunks around my house in a subdivision. The little buggers would take up residence in the siding of the house if I left them alone.
The .177 so far has had plenty of power without worrying about noise or excess penetration. I tried .22 CB's in the friend's barn and they would put holes in the tin roof. They go through a 1 inch board and a layer of tin, and leave bright little spots in the roof when the sun shines through. I would be afraid to use them if there were neighbors who could be on the receiving end of a ricochet. They are also louder than the air rifle.
The .177's do not put holes in the barn roof, but they kill the pigeons quickly and humanely. Accuracy has been very good as well. I vote for the .177.
Last edited by wildhobbybobby; 10/04/14.
Life is like a purple antelope on a field of tuna fish...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,499
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,499 |
I have a 34 in .22. Our house in AL sat on an acre, bird feeder was 41 yards from the back door. Many a squirrel and feral cat met their demise from a 22 pellet. It will still penetrate a coke can full of water at that range.
There is no way to coexist no matter how many bumper stickers there are on Subaru bumpers!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,234
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,234 |
I have a .177 and it will handily kill squirrels, but I'd go .22 if I needed to take care of something bigger than that.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,608
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,608 |
I've never had what I would call acceptable accuracy with cbs That's because your shooting CB shorts not longs. CB longs are the same length as a 22 LR, but don't have as much power as an LR.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,580
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,580 |
OK I give up. I'm being over run by pests. OK not over run but enough I want to be able to hit them.
After doing several hours of research I believe I want to go with a RWS 34. Now which one. Regular compact etc. of course let's not forget .177 or 22.
I will be shooting critters in the yard while we have 1.5 acres we do have neighbors I felt the 34 would be better than something like the 350 etc. My Crosman was a .177 and it never failed to kill if it hit them. I have been using one of these: http://flyingdragonairrifles.org/XISICO_XS46U.htmlI had it tuned and an air-ram installed. I wanted something that was able to be cocked for a while while hunting without worrying about the spring setting. It takes some effort to cock at first, but it's gotten easier. It shoots well enough for red-squirrel head-shots at 15 yards. The trigger isn't the best, but it is much better than what I've found on comparably priced air-rifles.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317 |
I think the 22's are better killers than .177's. Even though the 22's have a lower velocity, they are roughly double the weight of the .177's.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 435
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 435 |
Double bullet weight! Man think about the increase in recoil. I've had no issues with a .177 not killing at the range I'm shooting. Provided I can hit it. Pellet performance hasn't been an issue.
Just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35 |
I have a .177 RWS 34 that has taken a good many pests, they work well but won't knock down nearly the critters my .22 Discovery PCP will...I haven't shot the RWS 34 in a couple years, the Discovery does everything the 34 does and more when it comes to larger game.
If you plan to go with a spring air rifle the 34 is awful tough to beat, they shoot lights out and have the feel/weight of a real rifle. You will need to practice different "holds" with it as springers are very hold sensitive.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 435
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 435 |
Dixie, I've figured out in the last few days my hold SUCKS. Had a friend lend me his 34 compact. I couldn't hit things hardly any better than with my old Crosman. After probably 100rds I finally got to the point I could barely hold the rifle let it do it's thing and get 3 of 5 shoots in the 1/2" range at about 20 yds. I did find the pellets I had been using in my Crosman and using my better hold I could get some 1.25" groups with the old rifle. I also remounted the scope. I guess my eyes just won't handle open sights any more.
My friend ordered a Marauder so I'm going to see how he likes it. If I can't get my hold more consistent a 34 would probably be a waste. I might have to consider a PCP.
I also picked up some cci low velocity to see how loud they are and if my rifle will group them.
Last edited by ramrod340; 10/12/14.
Just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16,971 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16,971 Likes: 1 |
RWS are heavy, I had a 48 years ago.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35 |
Dixie, I've figured out in the last few days my hold SUCKS. Had a friend lend me his 34 compact. I couldn't hit things hardly any better than with my old Crosman. After probably 100rds I finally got to the point I could barely hold the rifle let it do it's thing and get 3 of 5 shoots in the 1/2" range at about 20 yds. I did find the pellets I had been using in my Crosman and using my better hold I could get some 1.25" groups with the old rifle. I also remounted the scope. I guess my eyes just won't handle open sights any more.
My friend ordered a Marauder so I'm going to see how he likes it. If I can't get my hold more consistent a 34 would probably be a waste. I might have to consider a PCP.
I also picked up some cci low velocity to see how loud they are and if my rifle will group them. This is a group shot with my Benjamin Discovery and the Crossman HP pellets at 50 yards outdoors. The rifle will print them like that all day, everyday For the money you won't beat a Discovery ...gun with pump $320 ish and they shoot great, the added benefit to them is they are lightweight. A bit loud but not much more than a springer if any and you can get a moderator if it matters to you. Best deal in air rilfes out there $.02
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,773
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,773 |
I think the 22's are better killers than .177's. Even though the 22's have a lower velocity, they are roughly double the weight of the .177's. I agree with this. I have owned several 34's, decent guns but not in the same league as the R9. Whichever you choose the .22 is a better 'killer' in my experience of several hundred rock chucks over the past 10 years shooting both .177 & .22.
A true sportsman counts his achievements in proportion to the effort involved and fairness of the sport. - S. Pope
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,813
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,813 |
A friend has an RWS and it is insanely accurate. No problem at all to hit squirrels in the head from reasonable distances with just the irons. He scoped it for a while but it was so accurate and fun with the open sights he took the scope off
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,365
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,365 |
My friend ordered a Marauder so I'm going to see how he likes it. If I can't get my hold more consistent a 34 would probably be a waste. I might have to consider a PCP. Your friend will love his Marauder, I have one in 22 and 25. I shoot my 22 Marauder for indoor 22LR shoots and it kicks azz. I don't use my 22 LR anymore for indoor shoots as my Marauder will shoot bug holes. Wish we could use them for hunting here in PA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 631
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 631 |
I have a RWS 34 in .177 and 2 Daisy multi-pumps in .177. I use them like tools, the RWS is preferred on long shots at larger pest birds like crows, and it has a flatter trajectory at distance over the mult-pumps. Because I also have neighbors nearby I mostly use the Daisy guns as I can adjust the power to fit the situation, and they are less noisy too. The accuracy is better on the Daises as well, but I have gotten good with my "Artillery hold" method with the RWS and the accuracy is acceptable.
|
|
|
|
519 members (22250rem, 01Foreman400, 1badf350, 1Longbow, 160user, 10Glocks, 51 invisible),
2,149
guests, and
1,175
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,236
Posts18,504,459
Members73,994
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|