|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,111 Likes: 7
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,111 Likes: 7 |
Doesn't Hunter Class BR use 6X at 300 yards?
I wonder how big their target center is (in moa)?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,935 Likes: 71
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,935 Likes: 71 |
I can't remember ever shooting at 1000 yards and wishing my scope had LESS magnification.
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,571
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,571 |
I can't remember ever shooting at 1000 yards and wishing my scope had LESS magnification. I can.... the fixed 12x was occasionally tough to spot hits/misses with on the 7 Mag. I specifically remember dialing a .300 back from 20x to 8-9x so I could spot hits/misses at 1k. Would you rather have: greater precision to aim the shot..... at the potential expense of seeing the shot, or certainty of seeing the shot/hit.... at the potential expense of greater aiming precision?
You better pray to the God of Skinny Punks that this wind doesn't pick up......
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,944 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,944 Likes: 3 |
I am beginning to decipher the viable differences between FFP & SFP reticles. It appears to me one of the determining factors is whether you intend to range with your scope or range with electronics. Am I wrong?
By the way, in case you missed it, Jeremiah was a bullfrog.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,111 Likes: 7
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,111 Likes: 7 |
Lots of personal preference plays here.
One of my shooting buds uses a Nightforce ATACR. We were shooting one of his rigs at just over 2000 yards a while back. He liked the magnification up at 20+, I dialed it down to around 11-12X. We both were hitting the same moa size rock (338 Edge, 300gr Bergers).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,558 Likes: 7
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,558 Likes: 7 |
My next scope will go to at least 22x, or I am getting a larger target to better read hits.
IME, this is a wise idea. It makes spotting your misses a whole lot easier when they are still hitting steel! If I intend to shoot a 10" square, I often like to use a 16" piece of AR500 and paint a 10" square on the plate. That way if I'm shooting alone and have a hard time spotting the trace or splash of my misses, I can still see the near misses on the plate.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,558 Likes: 7
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,558 Likes: 7 |
Jordan, Rick, Drew, Cummins, etc....... we all know 1153 yards is a far piece for 6x glass.... but we all know it CAN be done. I ask this: for big game, and 1-2 MOA targets, what magnification do you feel is necessary to consistently make hits to 1/2 mile? On a 12" and 16" plate I feel quite comfortable with a 6x scope out to 800 meters, so that is what I would say is "necessary". I have hit smaller targets at longer ranges with a 6x ( ), but at the distances in question I prefer 9x, and my ideal is ~10x out to about 1000.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,558 Likes: 7
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,558 Likes: 7 |
I don't doubt Jordan can hold a consistent aimpoint on a 1 moa target with a 6X scope, regardless of distance to target. Reticle thickness would be the main thing that might hold someone back.
For reference I've shot clay birds off the 1000 yard berm with a Bushnell 3200 10X without trouble. That's about a 4.5" target, and less than .5 moa at 1K yards. The reticle almost covered the target, but not quite.
As long it's possible to bisect a target with the reticle, one can make repeatable holds on the target.
With my MK4 mentioned above, I most always ran it around 8X for the bigger fov. I shot it past 1K a lot.
Careful, Shane! Apparently by say that, you are claiming that you never miss clay pigeons at 1000!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,558 Likes: 7
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,558 Likes: 7 |
I can't remember ever shooting at 1000 yards and wishing my scope had LESS magnification. I can.... the fixed 12x was occasionally tough to spot hits/misses with on the 7 Mag. I specifically remember dialing a .300 back from 20x to 8-9x so I could spot hits/misses at 1k. Would you rather have: greater precision to aim the shot..... at the potential expense of seeing the shot, or certainty of seeing the shot/hit.... at the potential expense of greater aiming precision? I've certainly been shooting steel at 1000 and turned down the magnification...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,558 Likes: 7
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,558 Likes: 7 |
I am beginning to decipher the viable differences between FFP & SFP reticles. It appears to me one of the determining factors is whether you intend to range with your scope or range with electronics. Am I wrong? Yes. Please go back and read post #9247557, in which I outline at some length many of the benefits of FFP vs. SFP scopes. Hint- ranging is somewhere wayyy down the list
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,111 Likes: 7
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,111 Likes: 7 |
I don't doubt Jordan can hold a consistent aimpoint on a 1 moa target with a 6X scope, regardless of distance to target. Reticle thickness would be the main thing that might hold someone back.
For reference I've shot clay birds off the 1000 yard berm with a Bushnell 3200 10X without trouble. That's about a 4.5" target, and less than .5 moa at 1K yards. The reticle almost covered the target, but not quite.
As long it's possible to bisect a target with the reticle, one can make repeatable holds on the target.
With my MK4 mentioned above, I most always ran it around 8X for the bigger fov. I shot it past 1K a lot.
Careful, Shane! Apparently by say that, you are claiming that you never miss clay pigeons at 1000! Without trouble holding on the target.....grin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,944 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,944 Likes: 3 |
It is interesting that several of you have mentioned no feeling of shortcoming using fixed powers. I have been pretty partial to 6x's to date. Have made some great long range (for me) kills with them and barely gave it a second thought.
By the way, in case you missed it, Jeremiah was a bullfrog.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,944 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,944 Likes: 3 |
Please go back and read post #9247557, in which I outline at some length many of the benefits of FFP vs. SFP scopes. Hint- ranging is somewhere wayyy down the list Did that, twice. Thanx for the reminder. My mind is made.
By the way, in case you missed it, Jeremiah was a bullfrog.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,935 Likes: 71
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,935 Likes: 71 |
9"X12" IPSC plate at 760 yards on 6 power. Bigger than 1 MOA. Same plate on 18 power...
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,944 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,944 Likes: 3 |
That puts it in perspective.
By the way, in case you missed it, Jeremiah was a bullfrog.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,130
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,130 |
Are you taking a poll...... I'll take 18x in that senario!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,935 Likes: 71
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,935 Likes: 71 |
Would you rather have: greater precision to aim the shot..... at the potential expense of seeing the shot, or certainty of seeing the shot/hit.... at the potential expense of greater aiming precision?
Much rather have the precision of aiming. It ends up in a more precise shot and an impact. That's the great thing about a Brake. You can spot your shot at the scope's highest magnification and you can shoot better too because of the absense of recoil. That's another thread too. So here's one for you. Do you all have 6 power Binoculars for spotting game and judging them on a long range hunt? LOL
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,935 Likes: 71
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,935 Likes: 71 |
Are you taking a poll...... I'll take 18x in that senario! Imagine a smaller plate (10") at 400 more yards. 6 power ROCKS! LOL!
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,925 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,925 Likes: 3 |
rcamuglia,
Since I have tried to take photos through a scope I am very impressed with the photography. Those are some good shots.
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,935 Likes: 71
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,935 Likes: 71 |
You'll soon realize that I'm Da Man! LOL
There's that damn Ego again reering its ugly head! DBL-LOL!
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
|
|
|
|
509 members (300_savage, 1minute, 10gaugemag, 2500HD, 270cowboy, 10gaugeman, 48 invisible),
1,801
guests, and
1,256
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,054
Posts18,521,335
Members74,023
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|