Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Could use some more hunters in New Jersey

Why? He has no compunction in blasphemy and others have no compunction in defrauding old people. To each their own, right?

Even though I do not hunt I am not a Liberal.
Similarly, it's not your hunting that makes you ignorant.

I'm far from ignorant, and you're far out of your league.

I have spent a good share of my career advocating for the elderly so defrauding "old" people is not what I do. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

But it's you identifying a problem and expecting someone else to fix it that makes you a liberal.

That's just too rich.

If you understand defrauding the elderly, then perhaps you should take a look here:

http://www.cbs.state.or.us/ins/admin_actions/actions_2011/producer_2011/10-02-005.pdf

And, here:

http://www.cbs.state.or.us/ins/admin_actions/actions_2003/producer_2003/02-09-007.pdf

Try those, just for starters.

Study up on these matters and get back to us on who does not have a clue.

Identifying a supposed problem and expecting someone else to fix it (or making someone else pay for it) is an excellent definition of a Liberal. "Global Climate change," formerly known as "Global Warming," is a good example. "Gun Violence" is another.

Let's just say I have identified and photographed the natural result of there being too few hunters in New Jersey. Which is all that I intended to do in the first place.

You complained about them in your yard and lamented needing more hunters in NJ, yet you refuse to address the problem on your own.

Perhaps you should take Mr. Claiborne up on his offer to have him come hunt there. It might be a fitting relationship.

Lieberal speak.

Keep Jesus out of it. [/quote]

Why? He has no compunction in blasphemy and others have no compunction in defrauding old people. To each their own, right?[/quote]

I have spent a good share of my career advocating for the elderly so defrauding "old" people is not what I do. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. [/quote]

That's just too rich.

If you understand defrauding the elderly, then perhaps you should take a look here:

http://www.cbs.state.or.us/ins/admin_actions/actions_2011/producer_2011/10-02-005.pdf

And, here:

http://www.cbs.state.or.us/ins/admin_actions/actions_2003/producer_2003/02-09-007.pdf

Try those, just for starters.

Study up on these matters and get back to us on who does not have a clue.[/quote]

If you read what I wrote, you wouldn't have wasted your time with posting links. Try again.

That's just too rich.

If you understand defrauding the elderly, then perhaps you should take a look here:

http://www.cbs.state.or.us/ins/admin_actions/actions_2011/producer_2011/10-02-005.pdf

And, here:

http://www.cbs.state.or.us/ins/admin_actions/actions_2003/producer_2003/02-09-007.pdf

Try those, just for starters.

Study up on these matters and get back to us on who does not have a clue.[/quote]

If you read what I wrote, you wouldn't have wasted your time with posting links. Try again. [/quote]

I read what you wrote. If you understand "defrauding the elderly", you should read those links. It would appear that you ought to have first-hand knowledge of that crime.

Too dangerous to hunt in New Jersey.
The slippery poop from the flocks of Canada Goose makes it impossible to get a good footing.

Whatever pathetic excuse you can use to justify your liberal stance, right?

NJ is a fitting place. Please, stay there.

I read what you wrote. If you understand "defrauding the elderly", you should read those links. It would appear that you ought to have first-hand knowledge of that crime.
[/quote]

I don't have any more knowledge about a "crime" than you do. Public record is what it is. I would suggest you lay off until you can find a shred of proof that I have defrauded the elderly in any way.

I read what you wrote. If you understand "defrauding the elderly", you should read those links. It would appear that you ought to have first-hand knowledge of that crime.
[/quote]

I don't have any more knowledge about a "crime" than you do. Public record is what it is. I would suggest you lay off until you can find a shred of proof that I have defrauded the elderly in any way. [/quote]

I never said you defrauded the elderly.

I said you should have some first hand knowledge of it, though.

The public record in question is plenty.