|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,554
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,554 |
Over Brady, no way, over Manning, probably.
Better than Rodgers? That's crazy talk right there. Rodgers has a much better arm than Wilson and his accuracy is off the charts. I'd take him over Brady too, right now. Brady might only have a couple of years left and I'd take another decade or more of elite QB play over a couple years any day. With both in their prime with what we know now I'd take Brady, but that might change by the end of Wilson's career as well. Key word right there.  Looking back at running QB's, how long have the usually lasted? 3-4 seasons before falling to mediocrity? Wilson needs to learn how be a pocket passer, look how long their career's last over a running QB. Brady is still playing at an elite level, the only other QB I would even consider over him would be Rodgers. Right now, he is the best QB in the NFL, bar none.
That's ok, I'll ass shoot a dink.
Steelhead
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 14,076
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 14,076 |
Let me rephrase that then, Brady only has a few years left...;)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,945
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,945 |
Rogers is the best QB in football right now.
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.
Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,499
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,499 |
Don't forget about that QB in Pittsburgh... I take Brady, manning, or rothlesberger in any order I'm a little bias being a steelers fan.
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego. Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,389
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,389 |
I'll play.
I'd go Rodgers, Brady, Wilson, Manning...in that order.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,945
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,945 |
Don't forget about that QB in Pittsburgh... I take Brady, manning, or rothlesberger in any order I'm a little bias being a steelers fan. No doubt, Big Ben is right there and actually overlooked a lot, I did it. But he has carried the Steelers right back into SB contention when many felt the Steelers would be a 500 team this year.
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.
Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,389
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,389 |
Yep, Big Ben is no joke. I'd put him a number 5 right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,776
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,776 |
O'cock is to the SeaHawks what Bowsinger is to Sarah Palin.
That said, Russell is a flat out stud at quarterback. He a better Rogers than Rogers is. He is what Vick and RGIII want to be. I'd take him over Brady or Manning.
The kid can fuggin' play. Laffin' Please tell me more of your towering ignorance!
The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment. � WARREN G. BENNIS
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,776
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,776 |
Rogers is the best QB in football right now. Best of all time. Fixed it for you
The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment. � WARREN G. BENNIS
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 33,971
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 33,971 |
Wilson will likely wind up getting crushed hard in these playoffs, Just way too many fast hard hitters in this lot to get away scott free.
Granted he's a tough guy but it only takes one hit.
Rodgers would be my number one pick. The rest are not relevant because you only get one!
Proud to be a true Sandlapper!!
Go Nats!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 25,102
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 25,102 |
O'cock is to the SeaHawks what Bowsinger is to Sarah Palin.
That said, Russell is a flat out stud at quarterback. He a better Rogers than Rogers is. He is what Vick and RGIII want to be. I'd take him over Brady or Manning.
The kid can fuggin' play. Laffin' Please tell me more of your towering ignorance! Ignerrants! You drunk dummy. What's Rogers record against Wilson?
“Life is life and fun is fun, but it's all so quiet when the goldfish die.”
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,035
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,035 |
Rodgers doesn't play defense.
Wilson has all of 20 TD and 6 INTs and a PR of 95.7
Rodgers has 35 TDs with 5 Ints and a PR of 111.00
Wilson's best PR at the end of the year was 101.2
Rodgers has 6 years with a final PR above that and tied it one other year.
Rodgers is a better QB - hands down.
Me
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,611
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,611 |
I don't think there's any doubt that Rogers is the best in the NFL right now. I also think that if Wilson keeps running he's going to end up like RGIII. It's just a matter of time. Romo will be kept out of the HOF by the people Dallas has surrounded him with all of these years. Brady is just Brady...don't count your chickens before they hatch...just ask the Jets. powdr
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 25,102
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 25,102 |
Just like final scores, PR doesn't tell the whole story.
Rogers, Brady, Brees, Manning, the Burger fella.....all great QB's.
Wilson is 6-0 against them. He's out scored the Pack 50-28.
I'm the first to cast doubt on running qb's. Wilson seems to be different. He can actually progress through check downs, he gets out of bounds, he always looks for the open guy when pushed out.
Like I said, maybe I'm wrong, but right now, Wilson looks to me like the best in the league.
Time will tell.
“Life is life and fun is fun, but it's all so quiet when the goldfish die.”
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 14,076
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 14,076 |
Rodgers doesn't play defense.
Wilson has all of 20 TD and 6 INTs and a PR of 95.7
Rodgers has 35 TDs with 5 Ints and a PR of 111.00
Wilson's best PR at the end of the year was 101.2
Rodgers has 6 years with a final PR above that and tied it one other year.
Rodgers is a better QB - hands down.
Yep, but I'll tell you one thing, if you put Rodgers behind Wilsons line Rodgers wouldn't have as much success as Wilson, but if Wilson had Rodgers line he likewise wouldn't have the success that Rodgers does. they bring different skill sets to the table. Both great QB's and both do things better than the other. however as a pure QB Rodgers wins hands down.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 25,102
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 25,102 |
I can agree with that.
That said, I'd take what the SH have with Wilson over the Pack and Rogers.
“Life is life and fun is fun, but it's all so quiet when the goldfish die.”
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,035
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,035 |
PR is the only thing I know of that measures what the QB does - on average over the season. It doesn't depend on what the defense of his team does or doesn't do.
Me
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 33,971
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 33,971 |
So now they're saying that with a Dallas win, a Cardinals loss and GB-DET tie that Dallas wins home field advantage and becomes the number 1 seed.
Without the tie and a SEA loss who takes number 1 seed?
Proud to be a true Sandlapper!!
Go Nats!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 14,742
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 14,742 |
Rodgers doesn't play defense.
Wilson has all of 20 TD and 6 INTs and a PR of 95.7
Rodgers has 35 TDs with 5 Ints and a PR of 111.00
Wilson's best PR at the end of the year was 101.2
Rodgers has 6 years with a final PR above that and tied it one other year.
Rodgers is a better QB - hands down.
In case you didn't know, Seattle is a smash mouth RUNNING team. Russell isn't needed to throw a lot of passes. That's Pete's philosophy. I think Rogers is the best right now, but Russell is only 26 years old and still learning. Rogers is still notch below Montana, the best to ever play. The Hawks have signed nearly every key defensive player to 4 year extensions. This off season they will reward Wilson with a nice contract.They will also extend Bobby Wagner contract..remember that name, he is a flat out stud at middle line backer...him and Kuechly are the top ILB in the game. GO HAWKS!! Seattle and New England in the SB.!! BOOK IT BABY!!
Jed York does not own the 49ers; Russell Wilson does.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,035
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,035 |
In case you didn't know - a team who runs the ball a lot should have a very high PR at QB then because there's less chance for the QB to do the things that drop that number.
INT/INC
So if he's not throwing a lot of passes - 6 INT's isn't the mark of a good QB.
Me
|
|
|
|
|
617 members (1beaver_shooter, 257 mag, 10Glocks, 1badf350, 160user, 1lessdog, 53 invisible),
2,403
guests, and
1,315
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,832
Posts18,478,014
Members73,948
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
