Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunting Rifles 375 Ruger VS. 338 Winnie

Just doing a little thinking here. Yes, it does hurt.

Is there any real world difference between the 2 cartridges for average big game hunting? I'm talking shots from 450 yds down to 10 yds. On game from deer up to elk, black bear, and if I'm ever lucky enough moose.

I own a 375 Ruger in the Alaskan package, my load pushes a 270 Hornady at 2600. It is not a max load but shoots awesome.

Not really any need for a 338 win mag besides having a new gun that I can see.

Mostly just a winter time conversation here. That and I've been drooling over a MRC in there all weather model. Man they make a nice looking CRF package.

They sure do make a hell of a nice package. However, the 338 win mag won't do anything any better than your 375 Ruger already does. Except maybe recoil a bit less. With this being said, the 338 win mag is also a favorite of mine and I wouldn't be without one in the stable. Furthermore, this doesn't sound like a comparison thread, just an excuse to buy another rifle. I'd say do it!!!!

I don't see any reason to limit my self on rifles on good calibers. My 375 is an H&H because I haven't found a stainless 375 Alaskan, when I do I will buy it. But I typically have at least two 338 WM's. Why a guy would limit himself is beyond me.

Good advice, buy never sell.. I always regret it when I sell. At present, I have no .338 but do have a .340 and .375 H & H.. Used the H & H on moose and elk this year.. Haven't shot the .340 in maybe 5 or 6 years, but I MIGHT NEED IT SOME DAY.. So I will keep it in the safe.. I have younger friends that are going to inherit quite a few guns someday.. Buy the .338.....

No doubt some first class enablers here.

No.

But if you want another rifle that's a different conversation.

What....

Hey, not judging, takes one to know one. This place is like AA, just without the recovery process. Personally, I've never met a .22 pistol I didn't like.

This place ain't like AA, no room for quitters around here!!!

Both are equally good choice for American farmer after heavier game though one with name bigswede358 would be wise to change it to bigamerican35 and look at .35 Newton. Why? Ammo and brass are made of unobtainium so it would have to be custom loaded for you. It would be analogous to getting tailored suit and custom made leather shoes. Ruger and Winchester are well, ......genetic stuff, not good enough. That is like buying suit & shoes at Ralph Lauren outlet. A baron should not do that!

This place has cost me a lot of money... I'm glad I'm not the only one in the same boat though

Boy you ain't kidding there!!

I took the screen name when I had a 358 Norma built years ago, its the Big Swede and the 308 Norma the little swede. That and my great grandpa was 100% Swedish immigrant.

My 350 Rem Mag cures my 35 caliber itch at the present.

Buy the 338. Make sure you have every base covered.




I do not have a problem. I do not need help. Neither do you. We are not influenced by these enablers.

possibility of lighter bullets in the 338 down to 160 grain

bigswede I hate to be the wet blanket and challenge the enablers because the cartridges mentioned are all swell....

.... but if you load that 375 Ruger to over 2900 fps(pretty easy,and I would not be surprised to see it hit 3000 fps from a 24" barrel) with a 250 TTSX,some further reflection, no matter how painful, will show that it's easily as good as any medium you can buy and better than many.

Use on the animals you mention will prove you don't need anything else in a medium bore.

The 250 gr Bitterroot in the 375H&H at those velocities showed me that back in the late 80's/ early 90's. The 250 TTSX is likely just as good.

Deer (if you want)to brown bear...it'll cover it all.

Bob,

Your 375 example with 250 TTSX at 2950 fps does surprisingly well on paper out to 450+ yards. Similar to the 225 TTSX at 2900 fps from the 338. Even compared to the best 250gr high BC bullets in 338 at 2700 fps.

My only concern would be the recoil from prone if shooting at 450 yards is really a priority for BigSwede, and practice is in the game plan.

I had a 375R shooting the 260gr NAB at 2900+ fps. It kicked like a mule from prone shooting out to 500 yards. In comparison, the 225gr TTSX at 2900 fps was very manageable from the 338. Rifles were very close in terms of overall weight, no brakes. My buds thought the 338 had too much recoil, the 375 would have hurt them!

The 260gr at 2700 fps seemed much more manageable during load development but that's 338 territory.

Still, the 375 seems like a versatile cartridge... with the option for 300gr loads. I can see why so many people like it and skip right past the 338.

Jason

I will be no help at all here as I have a 375R and plan on getting a 338 in the next few months...just cause I want one. I need neither!!

You're right not much help at all

What is your 375 in?

Bob,
I have the 20" Alaskan model. I sling 270 gr Hornadys at 2640 fps. It is not max load but it shoots really well. The old Hornadys I shoot have a BC of .485. They shoot just about as flat as I need for as far as I shoot. First critter I killed with it was a little raghorn bull at 376 yds. Bullet didn't hardly drop at all, that was with a 1.5-5x Leupy also. I've since went to a 2-7, a little more practical.

I did work up a load with the 250 Sierra gamekings, I got them going about 2800 with a nice tight group. There really wasn't a whole lot of difference with a ballistics calculator when compared to my 270 load. I know that is not actual experience but they usually come pretty close.