Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Who "hates" Jesus Christ the most? - Jews or Muzzies?

Do you eat while staring into a mirror?

Give it up,Jorge.

Since he has outed you as a Jew and has informed us gentiles that you are required to lie to us, he has boxed you in.

Even if you posted a picture of your un-circumsised dick, he'd claim it was grafted back on.

Face it, he's just too smart for all of us, even if he didn't have Derby Dude in his corner.

Next you'll be asking us to refute the thesis as to why Jaysus SAVES!..but Moses INVESTS. FOAD

Also, I'm pretty sure it's highly illegal to 'dine with the dead' you may want to read up on that.

LMMFAO

Raisuli/bigsqueeze/Sansucksalotofcock/Laguna... They're all the same freak.




Travis

gunnar500,

Are you calling me a liar?

Make no mistake, I have called you stupid because you are. But I have not called you a liar. Just because you're a dim bulb doesn't make you stupid.

There is a reason why I rarely come here. It's a bastion of neocons & liberals. They undermine their own interests; that is, if liberty is one of their interests.

When they awake sans a Second Amendment, they will be the cause of its demise.

And he we have the gay porn stunt fluffer whose preoccupation with male genitalia has stretched his mouth to the point of vomiting inanity.

Here's another theory I postulated years ago after a port call in Haifa; Jewish chicks grow tits before the grow arms...

I gotta run.

In the mean time, one of you on the Phi Beta Kappa debate team come up with a cogent refutation of the thesis found in Plausible Denial and Final Judgment.

Pepto Bismol. Probably invented by a jew scientist though...

Rules for Radical No. 17:

Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can �argue� with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

Based upon your rap sheet here, Jorge, I figured you'd be teaching Rules for Radicals to 'fire posters. Keep it up. You have managed more than a few converts. However, the wise can see that you have yet to attempt to refute the thesis of Plausible Denial & Final Judgement; in the case of the former, Lane's thesis was proved factual. So let's call it what it really is: Lane's FACT.

Vaya Con Dios

I guess the Pepto worked. Pepto Bismol, the new jew wonder-drug, it even cures diarrhea of the mouth in gentiles..

Yes, and she's a riot too.

The Holocaust, with good reason, has made anti-Semitism unpopular in the extreme. The horror experienced by the world was well founded. However, it has also blinded us to some of the discussions and ideas that were common BEFORE WW II throughout the world, not just Germany

For instance, before WW II, Bolshevism was most often referred to as Jewish Bolshevism and understood to be a Jewish Revolution as that both Marx and Engels were Jews and four of the seven members of the original Politburo were Jews. Whether or not in the light of history, that understanding of the day was founded is debatable, but it was the common understanding EVERYWHERE.

Further, this conception that Bolshevism and Jewry were one and the same was IN LARGE PART behind much of the NAZI anti-Semitism. Germany had narrowly survived Bolshevik revolutions of its own and indeed, the Bavarian Soviet had ruled that state for a time in the early 20s and the people in charge of it were what? Jewish, of course.

Now you can make all sorts of arguments as to why such ideas were wrong and explain it all away. And, in fact, you might very well be right. But that doesn't change the fact that in those days, such things were the accepted wisdom.

So much was it the accepted wisdom that none other than Winston Churchill was willing to pen an article for a London newspaper in the 1930s in which Bolshevism and the "International Jew" were the main subjects. Churchill

Of course, Jorge's head will probably explode as that Churchill was one of his self professed heroes, yet there he is expressing beliefs Jorge says are "kooky".

Hatred like the following from spiritual leaders like Martin Luther set the stage and laid the groundwork, too, about 400 years earlier. The Jew has seldom been welcome in Europe unless they had wealth to steal. Too bad Luther didn't state his opinion plainly. Sounds a bit indictful and inciteful.

Christ called Jewish leaders "...open sepulchers" and it is to be presumed that those Jews who rejected him and continued to follow those leaders and their traditions come under that condemnation. So, I think it is to be expected, but not condoned, that at various points in history Christians have taken that as a mandate for ill treatment of said Jews. That said, we understand that as Christ said, "...his Kingdom was not of this world" and as Paul said, "...we do not fight flesh and blood." So, of course, a Christian is forbidden to commit violence on anyone for any reason other than legitimate self-defense or defense of others.

This is pretty typical of skeptics--deny the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth who was crucified by Pilate, and then if the Christian provides good evidence, shift the argument to the denial of the deity of Jesus.

The shift in position shows the weakness of a position which changes for a more convenient defense. The record certainly shows a man called Jesus of Nazareth who was crucified under Pontius Pilate. Whether that man rose again from the dead would be a consideration beyond the scope of this thread.

But again, all the antagonists of Christianity needed to do on order to dispel the resurrection/deity of Christ myth was to produce the body of the man they crucified.

OUCH. Curdog, you made me cringe at even the thought of a knife down there. As a Naval Aviator, I have a big watch to compensate, and I need every bit I can

-----------

I read the Jews and their Lies about 20 years ago. Being a huge fan of Luther the Reformer I was horrified. I want no parts of that treatise and I would not defend it. Nonetheless it has to be understood in the context of the times that Luther lived. The Jewish banking house, (Fuggers) collected the indulgence funds as Tetzel hawked them, because Fuggers had loaned the money to the Biship of Mainz to purchase his third Bishopric and a seat as an elector.

The Jews were involved in the corruption of the Church that Luther was life and death trying to reform. It does not justify the intensity of "The Jews and their Lies" but it throws some light on the context.