|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 26
Campfire Greenhorn
|
OP
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 26 |
I'm looking for a scope for (mostly) whitetails. I hunt some areas that are low light and some areas that are open, long range. My requirements are a variable that ranges to a higher power and a lightweight scope. The Z5 5-25x52 is at the top of my budget range. Please talk me into or out of this scope. Any polite, alternate suggestions would be appreciated! Also, is the Z5 appreciably better than the Z3?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,108
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,108 |
Z5 is better than Z3. Got'em both, 3.5-18x44 BT and 4-12x50 BT. Instead of going "Hubble" for WT's and still wanting high power, I'd probably get a VX-6 3-18. Easier on your budget and the glass is Z5 quality if not better. It would probably take a Z6 to run with a VX-6. VX-6's are 30mm instead of 1", but they are streamline and not as heavy as some in their class. You'll have to check the weights on line. Swaros are pretty light, especially the 1" versions. You'll get more scope for your buck with a VX-6, IMO. I've posted before that my next Swaro will probably be another VX-6... DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 912
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 912 |
I would do the z5 over the z3 all day. Look at the 3.5-18x 44. Good price point for a nice versatile scope. Better guts in a z5 than z3.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,239
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,239 |
I would do the z5 over the z3 all day. Look at the 3.5-18x 44. Good price point for a nice versatile scope. Better guts in a z5 than z3. What's the difference?
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,855
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,855 |
I have a z5 5-25X52 and a VX-6 4-24X52. The VX-6 definitely has better glass to me. But they seem to punk out in low light about the same time. The z5 is lighter than the VX-6 by about 4-5 ounces.
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383 |
I would do the z5 over the z3 all day. Look at the 3.5-18x 44. Good price point for a nice versatile scope. Better guts in a z5 than z3. What's the difference? Extra lense for the 5x zoom and the coil springs instead of a leaf spring on the erector tube.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,659
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,659 |
the 3.5-18x44 has excellent glass and is under 1 lb. I don't see why you need more than 18 power on a hunting rifle, and 3.5 would be better for any close shots you might encounter.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,382
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,382 |
The Z5 and Z3 have the same quality glass and same coatings. Only the internals are different.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,062
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,062 |
I have a z5 5-25 and couldn't be happier. I would recommend the #4 reticle as the duplex will fade out in low light. The z5 is at the top of the game in the low light department. I would also say to check out the meopta lineup if you want a comparable scope for a few less bucks. I have had good luck out of either model and they are almost equal in low light.
"If you got it, you got it!" In memory of Pops, gone but never forgotten
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 106
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 106 |
Second NMSSHOOTER with the Z5 and the Meopta recommendation. I have a Z5 3.5-18 and a Meopta Meostar 4-12 and they are both great glass. Weight is not an issue with either of them and they both "fit" well on a sporter rifle. When you get into the bigger scopes with a 20+ high blend they have to be big and somewhat heavy. They are fine on a long range rig but not fully practice in most whitetail situations.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,893
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,893 |
I just took delivery on the Swaro 3.5-18x44 BT with 4W reticle which, they call The Sheep Hunter. I mounted it and have shot it for about 10 rounds. So far I like it. It tracks great.
I am not oblivious to earlier Swarovski shortcomings. Instead of shying from them I believe their optical qualities make them worth the price. Their warranties are above reproach.
At 15 oz, what's not to like?
"I never thought I'd live to see the day that a U.S. president would raise an army to invade his own country." Robert E. Lee
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 65
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 65 |
Z5 is better than Z3. Got'em both, 3.5-18x44 BT and 4-12x50 BT. Instead of going "Hubble" for WT's and still wanting high power, I'd probably get a VX-6 3-18. Easier on your budget and the glass is Z5 quality if not better. It would probably take a Z6 to run with a VX-6. VX-6's are 30mm instead of 1", but they are streamline and not as heavy as some in their class. You'll have to check the weights on line. Swaros are pretty light, especially the 1" versions. You'll get more scope for your buck with a VX-6, IMO. I've posted before that my next Swaro will probably be another VX-6... DF +1
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,855
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,855 |
Dirtfarmer, I've posted before that my next Swaro will probably be another VX-6... grin I should have caught this the first time. I agree.
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
|
|
|
|
317 members (10gaugeman, 17CalFan, 160user, 12344mag, 10ring1, 10Glocks, 34 invisible),
1,815
guests, and
1,067
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,759
Posts18,476,471
Members73,942
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|