24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,604
M
Mssgn Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
M
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,604
ringing he barrel risk with wad vs improper ignition and possible detonation without wad? What do you think?


"Delight yourself in the Lord and He will give you the desires of your heart." Psalm 37, verse 4.


"The lazy do not roast any game, but the diligent feed on the riches of the hunt." Proverbs 12:27
GB1

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 516
O
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 516
OP,
I use SR4759 in my 375 H&H with 220 HFP. Basically you have a 375 Win. I've killed WTs and it's a hoot to shoot. There are book reduced loads for the H&H so you don't need to guess


Why does a man who is 50 pounds overweight complain about a 10 pound rifle being too heavy?
SCI Life Member 4**
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 243
A
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 243
I was wondering about that myself. I haven't dug out the load manual to look yet but imagine there is some good reduced loads with an appropriate powder so you don't have to use cotton balls as wadding. With a cartridge that's been around as long as the 375 H&H I can't imagine you're the first owner of one that wanted to use it as a deer rifle with some reduced loads.

Last edited by Aught6; 03/16/15.
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,178
R
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
R
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,178
I wouldn't expect much reaction to the hit, other than running.
My prediction is a caliber sized hole through and through.
Keeping in mind the a 36 caliber muzzleloader is used on squirrel.


TRUMP- GABBARD 2024
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,604
M
Mssgn Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
M
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,604
Originally Posted by Big_Redhead
The ballistics of the load in the OP are fine for deer, but why the cotton wad? The only thing it accomplishes is to increase the chances of ringing the barrel and ruining the rifle. Lose the wad!


Since the powder load is a tiny fraction of the case capacity my reasoning is that the powder should be held tight to the primer. It works but I have recently read about he chance of "ringing" the barrel using a wad - so now I am wondering I I should just insert the cotton ball as filler instead of compressing it as a wad.... Or not use a filler or wad at all? Any thoughts on this?

Last edited by Mssgn; 03/17/15.

"Delight yourself in the Lord and He will give you the desires of your heart." Psalm 37, verse 4.


"The lazy do not roast any game, but the diligent feed on the riches of the hunt." Proverbs 12:27
IC B2

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,178
R
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
R
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,178
Use trailboss.


TRUMP- GABBARD 2024
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 243
A
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 243
Originally Posted by ringworm
I wouldn't expect much reaction to the hit, other than running.
My prediction is a caliber sized hole through and through.
Keeping in mind the a 36 caliber muzzleloader is used on squirrel.


If you run a flat point with a wide meplat (flat nose surface dia.) you might be surprised by the reaction and wound channel. If you check out some sites on hard cast bullets they have all sorts of info on the subject. I ran hard cast out of my Ruger No.1 45-70 almost exclusively and had better results from wide meplat hard casts than even the Hornady lever evolution loads. And I knew that with a hard cast there was no question about penetration.

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,846
Likes: 8
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,846
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by ringworm
I wouldn't expect much reaction to the hit, other than running.
My prediction is a caliber sized hole through and through.
Keeping in mind the a 36 caliber muzzleloader is used on squirrel.


36 caliber round ball - 71 grains

OP cast bullet - 255 grains

No comparison.


Chronographs, bore scopes and pattern boards have broke a lot of hearts.
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,425
M
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
M
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,425
Originally Posted by ringworm
Use trailboss.


Or 4759. Tiny volume charges in big cases are just begging for a double charge.


Life begins at 40. Recoil begins at "Over 40" Coincidence? I don't think so.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,604
M
Mssgn Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
M
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,604
Tiny amounts of powder are exactly WHY I am using Red Dot. This load (15 grains) gives me 466 shots per pound of powder. As opposed to 100 loads per pound of R-15 for example.


"Delight yourself in the Lord and He will give you the desires of your heart." Psalm 37, verse 4.


"The lazy do not roast any game, but the diligent feed on the riches of the hunt." Proverbs 12:27
IC B3

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,109
Likes: 5
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,109
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by Mssgn
Tiny amounts of powder are exactly WHY I am using Red Dot. This load (15 grains) gives me 466 shots per pound of powder. As opposed to 100 loads per pound of R-15 for example.


Get a nice double or triple charge of the Red Dot in there and then you can see just how "cheap" it is.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,940
Likes: 23
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,940
Likes: 23
I'd opt for Trail Boss as well, but according to Hodgdon, you top out at less than 1200 with a 235gr jacketed. Maybe a 60% H4895 would be workable, if not quite so cheap.

I cannot recall reading about using cotton for a wad anywhere. Kapok, Dacron, Grex, and maybe Puff-lon, but cotton sounds risky to me. Dacron supposedly burns up, and I believe kapok may as well. Was this something you dreamed up, or do you have a credible source? None of my business, of course, but I'd hate to see a nice rifle damaged, or even your lovely face.

Last edited by Pappy348; 04/05/15.

What fresh Hell is this?
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,178
R
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
R
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,178
I've punched .458 cast through many a deer at sedate black powder up to HV speeds and the vast majority of the time they react to the sound more than the hit. I've had them startle jump and go back to feeding.


TRUMP- GABBARD 2024
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
T
New Member
Offline
New Member
T
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
I have a 375 Winchester 94 Big Bore and like to play around with basically the same load as you described. I have shot it through a bunch of water soaked newspapers,scrap wood and into dirt banks. It penetrated deep and strait.
I have shot exactly one, not very impressive pig through the shoulders with it. The pig fell down kicking and the bullet kicked up dirt as it headed toward parts unknown. I freely admit I have nowhere the experience of others on this site, but I think it would be a lot of fun to hunt deer with your setup.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

228 members (10gaugemag, 1minute, 338reddog, 45_100, 406_SBC, 1beaver_shooter, 27 invisible), 2,464 guests, and 1,047 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,758
Posts18,514,915
Members74,017
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.115s Queries: 43 (0.021s) Memory: 0.8725 MB (Peak: 0.9587 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-16 05:21:21 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS