Oh, I forgot to mention, the study from Vietnam you posted is talking about cloth masks during prolonged use in high risk settings (like an ICU). It is not talking about the brief use of a mask when you go into a shop AT ALL. You clearly didn't read past the title.
It says " We should be cautious about cloth mask use in healthcare settings, particularly high-risk situations such as emergency departments, intensive care, paediatric or respiratory wards."
I dont think I'll get far convincing you otherwise, but here is my attempt. This isn't a flu bug. It's not the apocalypse either, but it's already surpassed any flu in recent memory. This is empirically worse. There's a member on another thread talking about being in a medically induced coma from it. Do you know anyone who has had that from influenza? Lastly, how likely is it that every nation on earth would play along with some democratic political stunt? I dont see that happening.
The masks are shown to have a significant effect on transmission rates. I'll link the studies if you like.
Look at countries that have contained this, specifically Japan and S. Korea. They wear masks, people get tested, and follow medical guidance if they're positive. It really was that simple.
I dont understand why this had to politicized. It should be viewed as taking civic responsibility, not being oppressed. It's a minor annoyance for you that could save someone else.
What is your ultimate goal for universal mask wearing? You say it is our duty that might save someone else?
I'm not trying to be confrontational with you, but I wear masks and gloves and a whole host of other PPE for a living and have for nearly 40 years. I tell my patients that I've been living in germs for 40 years. Like the Farmer's Insurance Commercial, I know a think or two because I've seen a thing or two.
- Wearing a mask in public does not make the virus go away.
- unless it mutates and fizzles out, it will continue in constant circulation around the global, masks or no masks. That means that people will continue to get it. There are currently 4 or 5 other minor corona viruses in constant global circulation and have been for years. Fortunately, they generally only cause common cold-like symptoms
- If you are in a high risk group, then I would recommend you stay home. Avoid all other humans. However, for the mass general public, the best that mask wearing does is SLOWS the rate of transmission, but will not halt it. It just kicks the can down the road and delaying ultimate heard immunity. People don't want to hear that, but without a vaccine, that is the best solution.
Look at Chicken Pox from the Varicella Zoster virus. It is highly contagious and a bane to mankind for centuries. We didn't have a vaccine for that until 1993 in the US. Many studies only show it is only about 70% effective. My point here is that science worked on a Chicken Pox vaccine for 70 years before one was found. That one is not 100% effective, and the Chicken Pox are still out there. 100 million + people all over the world still get it every year. While Chicken Pox isn't a big killer, it still gets about 7500 people every year.
Take all that as a lesson that this virus isn't going away, even with a vaccine.
Let's go back to "What is the objective of universal mask wearing?" Is it to halt the transmission? That is a hoax! It will not stop the transmission.
If the goal is to wear masks until a vaccine becomes available, that is misguided hope. There are zero vaccines available for ANY form of the human coronavirus family. Granted, nothing else since the Manhattan Project has had so many resources thrown at it in such a short time. Scientists in the US, GB, Germany, France, Italy, Iran, Russia, Pakistan, India, and even China are just the beginning of the list of countries with talented people working on this. If any break through can be made quickly, we will see it, but don't count on anything immediately no matter what CNN tells you.
To your last point, about the politicpoliticization of masks, it's all about politics now. Democrats want people wearing masks as a visible symbol of the crisis that somehow is Trump's fault. Democrat mayors in states like Georgia controlled by the GOP at the state level now are mandating mask wear within their city limits expressly to defy the governor who will not make it mandator statewide.
Look, this mask thing
as implemented is a farce. Go to a restaurant, I'm given a mask to walk to my table and then take it off. Have I really done anything to protect anybody in a significant sense? Not hardly. People that are truly high susceptible have a choice: go out and take their chances or stay home. You cannot protect everybody 24/7 from every cough, from every doorknob, shopping cart, from every desktop or surface they come in contact with. Again, the virus isn't likely to go away anytime soon.
Here are your scenarios for this virus:
- a vaccine comes quickly
- It continues to circle the globe until humans gain some form of herd immunity. That can happen quickly or slowly depending on the measures taken. Beyond the hope for a quick vaccine or concern about the healthcare system, why is making a 1 year process a 3 year process better?
- the virus mutates and fizzles out
- the virus mutates and kills us all
You brought up Japan and Korea. High population densities. Japan especially has an aging population. Japan didn't shelter in place, They all take mass transit. They should have been hit hard. You can say masks saved them, but considering this started in unhygienic China and didn't kill millions, I am more likely to say Asians are less affected by the virus than people of Mediterranean and African decent. Look at Italy and Spain and Iran compared to Germany and UK. Look at NYC/NJ area. Any Italians there? African Americans? More likely the answer IMHO.
There you go. You probably won't like it, but that's what we are dealing with.