But arent they now thought to be Jews? Are these the false Jews the Lord referred to in the Bible as those he knew their fathers to be vipers- the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Bilderbergs, Pincus, Warburgs, Paysures, etc?
The stiffnecked bastids care not one bit about Israel, preferring to suck muzzy cork, which btw, is fine with northmam, djs, gayghost, diddler, la roy, sickermore, etc.
interestingly the caspian sea is locally called "Khazar sea" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caspian_Sea not sure about the relationship. anybody who can make a gallon of oil last 8 days has my respect.
Maybe we should write our names and addresses on the front of a few more envelopes, just before licking them and sending them through a governmental processing center (USPS)..............All for a nominal tax of course.
DNA is real and identifiable but most of what you read about it is not, jmho!
Well if Jews ain’t Jews how am I supposed to blame em for everything?
FUGK!
Three points:
1) Your barely stated premise is that this information implies that there's no such thing as organized Jewry which has definite objectives. This information doesn't in any way imply that.
2) Another premise you imply is also false in that it's hugely exaggerated, i.e., your use of "everything."
3) Being Jewish, as I've stated from day one here (whenever this subject comes up) has little to nothing any longer to do with actual ancestry from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but is rather a cultural/religious/ethnic tradition which is primarily identified by a) its claim to having a connection with those three persons, and b) a unified approval of the Crucifixion of Christ as a just punishment for terrible crimes.
Well if Jews ain’t Jews how am I supposed to blame em for everything?
FUGK!
Three points:
1) Your barely stated premise is that this information implies that there's no such thing as organized Jewry which has definite objectives. This information doesn't in any way imply that.
2) Another premise you imply is also false in that it's hugely exaggerated, i.e., your use of "everything."
3) Being Jewish, as I've stated from day one here (whenever this subject comes up) has little to nothing any longer to do with actual ancestry from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but is rather a cultural/religious/ethnic tradition which is primarily identified by a) its claim to having a connection with those three persons, and b) a unified approval of the Crucifixion of Christ as a just punishment for terrible crimes.
So nothing has changed because you knew this all along?
Well if Jews ain’t Jews how am I supposed to blame em for everything?
FUGK!
Three points:
1) Your barely stated premise is that this information implies that there's no such thing as organized Jewry which has definite objectives. This information doesn't in any way imply that.
2) Another premise you imply is also false in that it's hugely exaggerated, i.e., your use of "everything."
3) Being Jewish, as I've stated from day one here (whenever this subject comes up) has little to nothing any longer to do with actual ancestry from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but is rather a cultural/religious/ethnic tradition which is primarily identified by a) its claim to having a connection with those three persons, and b) a unified approval of the Crucifixion of Christ as a just punishment for terrible crimes.
So nothing has changed because you knew this all along?
The Khazar theory has been out there since the 1940s, at least. Now it's also supported by science. It's meaningless as to me, however.
Also, still workshopping an ethnic slur that is genealogically accurate.
How about:
"You Organized Jew fugk!"
Thoughts?
What's wrong with "the Jews?" If I wish to criticize the Chinese for building artificial islands so as to expand what they claim as their national waters, I just say "the Chinese," and I don't anticipate anyone jumping up in a rage objecting that not all Chinese people are building those islands.
Bristoe and TRH discovered that they have both jooo and neegroe ancestors. They are pizzed because they are not rich, smart or well hung. Self hate produces a deranged and very limited thought process.
Bristoe and TRH discovered that they have both jooo and neegroe ancestors. They are pizzed because they are not rich, smart or well hung. Self hate produces a deranged and very limited thought process.
mike r
You're just pissed because you learned that you're no better than any other Caucasian.
Bristoe and TRH discovered that they have both jooo and neegroe ancestors. They are pizzed because they are not rich, smart or well hung. Self hate produces a deranged and very limited thought process.
mike r
You're just pissed because you learned that you're no better than any other Caucasian.
Not sure how you arrive at that as dot Indians are caucasian and I don't see them as being overly white or supreme at anything...okay, maybe spelling bees.
Not sure how you arrive at that as dot Indians are caucasian and I don't see them as being overly white or supreme at anything...okay, maybe spelling bees.
I'm thinkin dot Indians are not Caucasian, but something else entirely...don't care what no book might have to say on the matter, either.
Mike r merely posted a question, turns out Innuit is better, unless you're such an insensitive clod as to use the term "Eskimo"
Ha! Thats what them insensitive nuns put on the birth certificate at the orphanage!
Its a badge of honor!
Any people that can invent the kayak should be proud.
mike r
All's I know is that I tolerate the cold pretty well and in the fall when the leaves start to turn..I lose my mind and start stuffing food into every available storage place in the house and out buildings.
Mike r merely posted a question, turns out Innuit is better, unless you're such an insensitive clod as to use the term "Eskimo"
Ha! Thats what them insensitive nuns put on the birth certificate at the orphanage!
Its a badge of honor!
Any people that can invent the kayak should be proud.
mike r
All's I know is that I tolerate the cold pretty well and in the fall when the leaves start to turn..I lose my mind and start stuffing food into every available storage place in the house and out buildings.
Actually I had a buddy in the Peace Corps who had taught at a mixed Inuit/Eskimo and American Indian high school in Alaska. Of course both groups of students beat the crap out of each other regularly, said the one group of kids hated to be called the "E" word, so of course the Indians called 'em that all the time.
My mom's aunt and uncle taught school for several years on the rez. It was either Hays or Lodgepole...cant remember. I dont think they were combined back then.
Their kids were of course the only white kids in school.
Ar recess they would go out and play....Cowboys and Indians.
my, sometimes I think senile, 84 year old mother did stupid DNA stuff. Now all she can wonder on days, how did that get into my genes. Where did it come from (duh) etc... and what do I do about it.
Demanded that I did mine. I told her we have roots back to 1600s or so, IIRC, factual, what more do you want.
Of course mine came back some stuff she didn't expect.
But really, WGAF. This is a Gus post.
There isn't a thing I can do about my past. Only my future. Can't even change a minute ago.
And I'd never trade my lederhosen for a kilt or some stupid crap. I don't actually give a flip where I came from anyway, only where I'm going. In many ways.
“And I'd never trade my lederhosen for a kilt or some stupid crap.”
Hey Jeff! One of them Lehman boys from down there in your old hometown showed up at family reunion in damn Lederhosen! LOL!! His uncle who’s prolly like 4th gen Texan and WWII vet (now deceased) chewed his azz out in his dang thick Texas German accent ( you know the accent!) “Got dammitboy!!!! Get dem damn britches off now! I was chooting at kits in Germany in da war vearing dos damn things!!!! They vas trying to kill me!!"
They just updated a bunch of DNA tests as they "... have refined their techniques with over five times the comparison DNA samples" to use now. Original results were almost 3/4 Irish and a total of 11 genetic components. Had a number of tiny portions, like 2% Norse, and 8% WOP. New results have just 10% Mick, 40% French, and 50% Great Britain... for some reason I just lost a lot of faith in both results.
The new results obviously rely on family history and written genealogy. I already have that. I wanted the reality. The nice round numbers also bother me.
They just updated a bunch of DNA tests as they "... have refined their techniques with over five times the comparison DNA samples" to use now. Original results were almost 3/4 Irish and a total of 11 genetic components. Had a number of tiny portions, like 2% Norse, and 8% WOP. New results have just 10% Mick, 40% French, and 50% Great Britain... for some reason I just lost a lot of faith in both results.
The new results obviously rely on family history and written genealogy. I already have that. I wanted the reality. The nice round numbers also bother me.
I came to the conclusion some time ago that an educated guess is still just a guess.
They just updated a bunch of DNA tests as they "... have refined their techniques with over five times the comparison DNA samples" to use now. Original results were almost 3/4 Irish and a total of 11 genetic components. Had a number of tiny portions, like 2% Norse, and 8% WOP. New results have just 10% Mick, 40% French, and 50% Great Britain... for some reason I just lost a lot of faith in both results.
The new results obviously rely on family history and written genealogy. I already have that. I wanted the reality. The nice round numbers also bother me.
I came to the conclusion some time ago that an educated guess is still just a guess.
Must be something to it. They do a good job of matching you with close relatives.
"To those of you who missed the drama, allow me to start from the beginning. In their latest round of updates, 23andme stumbled upon the Behar et al. (2003) or the later Rootsi et al. (2013) co-authored by Behar and many other scientists that associated the Y haplogroups R1a1 or R-M198 with Near Eastern populations and possibly with the Khazars (given that this was one of the largest conversion events in the history of the region). Here is what Behar et al. (2003) wrote:"
"To those of you who missed the drama, allow me to start from the beginning. In their latest round of updates, 23andme stumbled upon the Behar et al. (2003) or the later Rootsi et al. (2013) co-authored by Behar and many other scientists that associated the Y haplogroups R1a1 or R-M198 with Near Eastern populations and possibly with the Khazars (given that this was one of the largest conversion events in the history of the region). Here is what Behar et al. (2003) wrote:"
The second linked article spells it out fairly plain.
For a more scientific take on the Jewish origin debate, recent DNA analysis of Ashkenazic Jews – a Jewish ethnic group – revealed that their maternal line is European. It has also been found that their DNA only has 3% ancient ancestry which links them with the Eastern Mediterranean (also known as the Middle East) – namely Israel, Lebanon, parts of Syria, and western Jordan. This is the part of the world Jewish people are said to have originally come from – according to the Old Testament. But 3% is a minuscule amount, and similar to what modern Europeans as a whole share with Neanderthals. So given that the genetic ancestry link is so low, Ashkenazic Jews’ most recent ancestors must be from elsewhere.
That wouldn't bother most people. But just being a garden variety Caucasian isn't good enough for some.
My only comment about all of Bristoe's links is, "So what?"
After all, go back far enough, and Bristoe's ancestors were black Africans. As were all of ours.
About 70,000 years ago (or thereabouts) a group left Africa and later evolved into all other races. Many changes evolved. Among these are a shorter lower face (maw), less sloped backward forehead, more gracile bones (on average, as are all characteristics--there is much ovefrlap), and possibly some mental abilities. White skin was relatively recent, about 10,000 years ago, and was a good survival mechanism where there is less sunllght at high latitudes. Many Asian groups have features that help living in the cold.
The groups left in Africa also evolved.
It also seems that the invention of farming and towns has caused our bodies to get less robust, our stature to get shorter, and our brains to get about 10% smaller. At least those things happened more or less concurrently.
Many changes are still going on. But now there is merging due to interbreeding. About 25% of "African American" DNA is Caucasian. What impressed me about blacks in Africa was how black they were.
So whether Ashkenazi Jews came from Turkey or Antarctica is a "don't care," as is 23andme information.
They just updated a bunch of DNA tests as they "... have refined their techniques with over five times the comparison DNA samples" to use now. Original results were almost 3/4 Irish and a total of 11 genetic components. Had a number of tiny portions, like 2% Norse, and 8% WOP. New results have just 10% Mick, 40% French, and 50% Great Britain... for some reason I just lost a lot of faith in both results.
The new results obviously rely on family history and written genealogy. I already have that. I wanted the reality. The nice round numbers also bother me.
I came to the conclusion some time ago that an educated guess is still just a guess.
Must be something to it. They do a good job of matching you with close relatives.
Yeah because of genealogy records and they reverse engineer the results.
My only comment about all of Bristoe's links is, "So what?"
After all, go back far enough, and Bristoe's ancestors were black Africans. As were all of ours.
About 70,000 years ago (or thereabouts) a group left Africa and later evolved into all other races. Many changes evolved. Among these are a shorter lower face (maw), less sloped backward forehead, more gracile bones (on average, as are all characteristics--there is much ovefrlap), and possibly some mental abilities. White skin was relatively recent, about 10,000 years ago, and was a good survival mechanism where there is less sunllght at high latitudes. Many Asian groups have features that help living in the cold.
The groups left in Africa also evolved.
It also seems that the invention of farming and towns has caused our bodies to get less robust, our stature to get shorter, and our brains to get about 10% smaller. At least those things happened more or less concurrently.
Many changes are still going on. But now there is merging due to interbreeding. About 25% of "African American" DNA is Caucasian. What impressed me about blacks in Africa was how black they were.
So whether Ashkenazi Jews came from Turkey or Antarctica is a "don't care," as is 23andme information.
Actually they are seriously questioning the whole cradle of Africa these days. A number of new finds all over are being looked at.
This is only a fraction of the trouble they are causing. Families are being ripped apart because they are learning that have half siblings they never knew of or that old uncle Joe raped a girl back in '79.
Yeah because of genealogy records and they reverse engineer the results.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. But I did the ancestry.com thing a few years ago and it accurately connected me with many relatives across America that I'm familiar with.
I've worked though the family tree a bit and found that ancestry.com correctly sorted out some family history that wasn't common knowledge even within many members of the family.
It's been very accurate in the way that it linked things together.
Yeah because of genealogy records and they reverse engineer the results.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. But I did the ancestry.com thing a few years ago and it accurately connected me with many relatives across America that I'm familiar with.
I've worked though the family tree a bit and found that ancestry.com correctly sorted out some family history that wasn't common knowledge even within many members of the family.
It's been very accurate in the way that it linked things together.
Because adopted children get put in the same place with papered relatives.
So whether Ashkenazi Jews came from Turkey or Antarctica is a "don't care," as is 23andme information.
I bet a lot of the Ashkenazi Jews care.
Bottom line. There's nobody on earth today that is closely related to the Biblical Israelites. Yet that's the idea that a large group of people base their entire identity on.
The Yemeni Jews have 10% DNA that can be linked to the biblical Israelites. They're only 90% Goyim. The Ashkenazi have such a small trace amount (3%) that it's not worth mentioning.
The whole thing is a hoax.
The Biblical Israelites mixed themselves into non-existence long, long ago.
Yeah because of genealogy records and they reverse engineer the results.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. But I did the ancestry.com thing a few years ago and it accurately connected me with many relatives across America that I'm familiar with.
I've worked though the family tree a bit and found that ancestry.com correctly sorted out some family history that wasn't common knowledge even within many members of the family.
It's been very accurate in the way that it linked things together.
Because adopted children get put in the same place with papered relatives.
No they don't.
A man's children don't get counted as his nieces and nephews, either,..as evidenced by some history in my extended family.
Yeah because of genealogy records and they reverse engineer the results.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. But I did the ancestry.com thing a few years ago and it accurately connected me with many relatives across America that I'm familiar with.
I've worked though the family tree a bit and found that ancestry.com correctly sorted out some family history that wasn't common knowledge even within many members of the family.
It's been very accurate in the way that it linked things together.
Because adopted children get put in the same place with papered relatives.
No they don't.
A man's children don't get counted as his nieces and nephews, either,..as evidenced by some history in my extended family.
Our family stuff has evidence of distant relations in wrong places.
So whether Ashkenazi Jews came from Turkey or Antarctica is a "don't care," as is 23andme information.
I bet a lot of the Ashkenazi Jews care.
Bottom line. There's nobody on earth today that is closely related to the Biblical Israelites. Yet that's the idea that a large group of people base their entire identity on.
The Yemeni Jews have 10% DNA that can be linked to the biblical Israelites. They're only 90% Goyim. The Ashkenazi have such a small trace amount (3%) that it's not worth mentioning.
The whole thing is a hoax.
The Biblical Israelites mixed themselves into non-existence long, long ago.
So the Jewish dominance in science, Nobels and such, is purely a function of nurture?
Yeah because of genealogy records and they reverse engineer the results.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. But I did the ancestry.com thing a few years ago and it accurately connected me with many relatives across America that I'm familiar with.
I've worked though the family tree a bit and found that ancestry.com correctly sorted out some family history that wasn't common knowledge even within many members of the family.
It's been very accurate in the way that it linked things together.
Because adopted children get put in the same place with papered relatives.
No they don't.
A man's children don't get counted as his nieces and nephews, either,..as evidenced by some history in my extended family.
Our family stuff has evidence of distant relations in wrong places.
You're obviously not familiar with how the test data is composed.
Ancestry.com linked me to relatives that I knew existed, but I've never met them. It also accurately composed the way that I was related to them and went back to the common ancestor we shared.
My only comment about all of Bristoe's links is, "So what?"
After all, go back far enough, and Bristoe's ancestors were black Africans. As were all of ours.
About 70,000 years ago (or thereabouts) a group left Africa and later evolved into all other races. Many changes evolved. Among these are a shorter lower face (maw), less sloped backward forehead, more gracile bones (on average, as are all characteristics--there is much ovefrlap), and possibly some mental abilities. White skin was relatively recent, about 10,000 years ago, and was a good survival mechanism where there is less sunllght at high latitudes. Many Asian groups have features that help living in the cold.
The groups left in Africa also evolved.
It also seems that the invention of farming and towns has caused our bodies to get less robust, our stature to get shorter, and our brains to get about 10% smaller. At least those things happened more or less concurrently.
Many changes are still going on. But now there is merging due to interbreeding. About 25% of "African American" DNA is Caucasian. What impressed me about blacks in Africa was how black they were.
So whether Ashkenazi Jews came from Turkey or Antarctica is a "don't care," as is 23andme information.
Actually they are seriously questioning the whole cradle of Africa these days. A number of new finds all over are being looked at.
Anybody who believes''they'' know who/what/when/where happened 70,000 years ago sure has far more confidence in the research than I do . It's all nothing but theory and there isn't much modern text that doesn't have an agenda . Not directing this at you Sitka deer - just giving an opinion on the topic .
My only comment about all of Bristoe's links is, "So what?"
After all, go back far enough, and Bristoe's ancestors were black Africans. As were all of ours.
About 70,000 years ago (or thereabouts) a group left Africa and later evolved into all other races. Many changes evolved. Among these are a shorter lower face (maw), less sloped backward forehead, more gracile bones (on average, as are all characteristics--there is much ovefrlap), and possibly some mental abilities. White skin was relatively recent, about 10,000 years ago, and was a good survival mechanism where there is less sunllght at high latitudes. Many Asian groups have features that help living in the cold.
The groups left in Africa also evolved.
It also seems that the invention of farming and towns has caused our bodies to get less robust, our stature to get shorter, and our brains to get about 10% smaller. At least those things happened more or less concurrently.
Many changes are still going on. But now there is merging due to interbreeding. About 25% of "African American" DNA is Caucasian. What impressed me about blacks in Africa was how black they were.
So whether Ashkenazi Jews came from Turkey or Antarctica is a "don't care," as is 23andme information.
Actually they are seriously questioning the whole cradle of Africa these days. A number of new finds all over are being looked at.
Anybody who believes''they'' know who/what/when/where happened 70,000 years ago sure has far more confidence in the research than I do . It's all nothing but theory and there isn't much modern text that doesn't have an agenda . Not directing this at you Sitka deer - just giving an opinion on the topic .
You obviously don't know what you are talking about and do not even know what the meaning of "theory" is in science. But that's not opinion. Just fact.
So the Jewish dominance in science, Nobels and such, is purely a function of nurture?
Culture and networking. They are highly organized as Jews, and give great preference to advancing other Jews, so they get in control of various venues (e.g., Newspapers), and they make sure only Jews are advanced through the ranks, and that lots of Jews get regularly published, and no non-Jews who aren't positively friendly to Jewish advancement are published. Same in banking, Hollywood, Ivy League, Nobel Prizes, the garment industry, publishing, etc., etc., etc..
It's like two baseball teams playing against each other, but one has been practicing together for months and working up strategies, determined to win, etc., while the other is made up of various equally talented athletes, but they were told they couldn't train together (in fact, they had never seen one-another till the game started), and couldn't even communicate with each other during the game. It would be a shutout.
So the Jewish dominance in science, Nobels and such, is purely a function of nurture?
Culture and networking. They are highly organized as Jews, and give great preference to advancing other Jews, so they get in control of various venues (e.g., Newspapers), and they make sure only Jews are advanced through the ranks, and that lots of Jews get regularly published, and no non-Jews who aren't friendly to Jewish advancement are published. Same in banking, Hollywood, Ivy League, Nobel Prizes, the garment industry, publishing, etc., etc., etc..
It's like two baseball teams playing against each other, but one has been practicing together for months and working up strategies, determined to win, etc., while the other is made up of various equally talented athletes, but they were told they couldn't train together (in fact, they had never seen one-another till the game started), and couldn't even communicate with each other during the game. It would be a shutout.
So the Jewish dominance in science, Nobels and such, is purely a function of nurture?
Culture and networking. They are highly organized as Jews, and give great preference to advancing other Jews, so they get in control of various venues (e.g., Newspapers), and they make sure only Jews are advanced through the ranks, and that lots of Jews get regularly published, and no non-Jews who aren't friendly to Jewish advancement are published. Same in banking, Hollywood, Ivy League, Nobel Prizes, the garment industry, publishing, etc., etc., etc..
It's like two baseball teams playing against each other, but one has been practicing together for months and working up strategies, determined to win, etc., while the other is made up of various equally talented athletes, but they were told they couldn't train together (in fact, they had never seen one-another till the game started), and couldn't even communicate with each other during the game. It would be a shutout.
The hate runs deep.
You response is absolutely, exactly, far leftist in it's origin.
So the Jewish dominance in science, Nobels and such, is purely a function of nurture?
Culture and networking. They are highly organized as Jews, and give great preference to advancing other Jews, so they get in control of various venues (e.g., Newspapers), and they make sure only Jews are advanced through the ranks, and that lots of Jews get regularly published, and no non-Jews who aren't friendly to Jewish advancement are published. Same in banking, Hollywood, Ivy League, Nobel Prizes, the garment industry, publishing, etc., etc., etc..
It's like two baseball teams playing against each other, but one has been practicing together for months and working up strategies, determined to win, etc., while the other is made up of various equally talented athletes, but they were told they couldn't train together (in fact, they had never seen one-another till the game started), and couldn't even communicate with each other during the game. It would be a shutout.
i have been chasing my pedigree for about 40years, off and on. when national geographic did their original dna test, i sent mine in, it was from the patriarchal side. it took them severl tries on testing it, because my markers are rare, for northern european, about 10% of the population. i came from the group out of africa, going north through siberia eventually ending up on the plains of russia about 15000years ago. they also sent a c.d. on the migration out of africa. I had to laugh. At the very beginning were four or five african pigmy's with bones through their noses. One of them was the spitting image of my wifes very anglo son. I did the ancestery.com dna test a few months ago, didn't really surprise me. about 40% northern european(german/danish) and about 40% central european. They nailed it, as immediately in the past it would be slovak/croat, and danish/german/scots. I already had most of my fathers linage down, but i was through them able to go back 8 generations, by name of my grandfathers. Most of this matched what i had already found. The part that puzzled me for many years knowing of the scottish connection, how did that tie in to the german/danish part. Duh, they are both celtic. One scottish ancester, a british sea captain, is son was born, lived and died in hollen germany. this is about 400 years ago. I have no doubt given the viking long ship thing, and their settling in northern ireland and scotland, that's the connection. interesting enough, ancestory did given me a list of peoples names with very close markers. One is a woman, who i haven't got a response from yet, never knew of her, but she lives in scotland and has about 17 markers same as mine. what this does for some people, like me, is to do further exploring in europe where these people lived. it is absolutely fascinating. My father told me we were scots, and german, but how he knew that had to be word of mouth. no written records. Other, than i finally located in west virginia, the church of the breathern church where on display is the family bible, coming over from europe in the 1700's. there is value in this stuff, i am a diabetic. diabetes runs in the family strain. I once had a doctor ask my ancestery regarding my being treated for high blood pressure. I told him on one side eric the red, the other attila the hun. Pretty close. He said that's the problem. What? He asked if i ever thought about jumping across my desk and throttling somebody. Only a couple times a week. He said that's the problem. what? well your ancestors didn't have that problem, they had battle axes and swords and solved the problem, you can't do that these days. He was a good doctor.
So the Jewish dominance in science, Nobels and such, is purely a function of nurture?
Culture and networking. They are highly organized as Jews, and give great preference to advancing other Jews, so they get in control of various venues (e.g., Newspapers), and they make sure only Jews are advanced through the ranks, and that lots of Jews get regularly published, and no non-Jews who aren't friendly to Jewish advancement are published. Same in banking, Hollywood, Ivy League, Nobel Prizes, the garment industry, publishing, etc., etc., etc..
It's like two baseball teams playing against each other, but one has been practicing together for months and working up strategies, determined to win, etc., while the other is made up of various equally talented athletes, but they were told they couldn't train together (in fact, they had never seen one-another till the game started), and couldn't even communicate with each other during the game. It would be a shutout.
So the Jewish dominance in science, Nobels and such, is purely a function of nurture?
Culture and networking. They are highly organized as Jews, and give great preference to advancing other Jews, so they get in control of various venues (e.g., Newspapers), and they make sure only Jews are advanced through the ranks, and that lots of Jews get regularly published, and no non-Jews who aren't friendly to Jewish advancement are published. Same in banking, Hollywood, Ivy League, Nobel Prizes, the garment industry, publishing, etc., etc., etc..
It's like two baseball teams playing against each other, but one has been practicing together for months and working up strategies, determined to win, etc., while the other is made up of various equally talented athletes, but they were told they couldn't train together (in fact, they had never seen one-another till the game started), and couldn't even communicate with each other during the game. It would be a shutout.
The hate runs deep.
You response is absolutely, exactly, far leftist in it's origin.
No matter what you say ol' crisco will have a label for it unless you sing from the same ignorance based hymnal as does he. I doubt if there is a rabbi in the country wasting their energy on crappy websites trying to prove their origins. Well adjusted persons are content w/ their own accomplishments and don't seek solace in the history of others.
I'd tell you to Google it, but the ADL has directed that Google's algorithms be manipulated so that certain kinds of searches (such as one on the question you just asked) will now only give you the opposite of what you're looking for.
I'd tell you to Google it, but the ADL has directed that Google's algorithms be manipulated so that certain kinds of searches (such as one on the question you just asked) will now only give you the opposite of what you're looking for.
WOW!!! You are laboring mightily to protect that KOTY title.
You have me confused having previously and on many occasions implied that I was jewish. mike r
That was before you came out said the following. I mean,...you know. Just because you find out that you're a garden variety Caucasian doesn't mean that you should overdo it,....start singing Tomorrow Belongs To Me, and alla that.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
What could be better than being a caucasian? mike r
I'd tell you to Google it, but the ADL has directed that Google's algorithms be manipulated so that certain kinds of searches (such as one on the question you just asked) will now only give you the opposite of what you're looking for.
Somebody need to PM Remsen and let him know he a gentile.
It's funny, I just got the results of my DNA test. It said I am from Kentucky. The jokes on them, though, because the DNA sample I sent them was used toilet paper.
Somebody need to PM Remsen and let him know he a gentile.
It's funny, I just got the results of my DNA test. It said I am from Kentucky. The jokes on them, though, because the DNA sample I sent them was used toilet paper.
lol,...The forum Jews get offended if you point to evidence which says that they're simply typical Caucasians.
So the Jewish dominance in science, Nobels and such, is purely a function of nurture?
Culture and networking. They are highly organized as Jews, and give great preference to advancing other Jews, so they get in control of various venues (e.g., Newspapers), and they make sure only Jews are advanced through the ranks, and that lots of Jews get regularly published, and no non-Jews who aren't positively friendly to Jewish advancement are published. Same in banking, Hollywood, Ivy League, Nobel Prizes, the garment industry, publishing, etc., etc., etc..
It's like two baseball teams playing against each other, but one has been practicing together for months and working up strategies, determined to win, etc., while the other is made up of various equally talented athletes, but they were told they couldn't train together (in fact, they had never seen one-another till the game started), and couldn't even communicate with each other during the game. It would be a shutout.
I'm confused. Is your problem that you're not a team player or just not a good enough athlete to make the team?
It goes to the core of their culture, for various historical reasons, to play as a Jewish team seeking to defeat the other teams for the advancement of Jews and Jewish interests (not just individually competitive), while this is not the culture of the European. It's why they had such an easy time overthrowing the Czar. It was a gigantic, well organized, team effort, drawing strength from many different power centers (the press, banking, etc.). They were on the verge of doing the very same thing in Germany after WWI, but it sparked a strong reaction against it, due to the existence of the recent example of Russia.
I once had a doctor ask my ancestery regarding my being treated for high blood pressure. I told him on one side eric the red, the other attila the hun. Pretty close. He said that's the problem. What? He asked if i ever thought about jumping across my desk and throttling somebody. Only a couple times a week. He said that's the problem. what? well your ancestors didn't have that problem, they had battle axes and swords and solved the problem, you can't do that these days. He was a good doctor.
The problem is no one is explaining their methodology.
For example this Elhaik guy, a scientist, from Israel (I most likely an Arab Israeli), actually steps out into the political arena and creates a website just for guys like yourself which is most likely how you were made aware of it though your sorta guys out there. Scientifically speaking, this is a HUGE red flag.
That is not how legitimate Science is done.
Meanwhile there's a LOT of pushback from other scientists in the field.....
Elhaik's 2012 study was specifically criticized for its use of Armenians and Azerbaijani Jews as proxies for Khazars and for using Bedouin and Jordanian Hashemites as a proxy for the Ancient Israelites. The former decision was criticized because Armenians were assumed to have a monolithic Caucasian ancestry, when as an Anatolian people (rather than Turkic) they contain many genetically Middle Eastern elements.
Azerbaijani Jews are also assumed for the purposes of the study to have Khazarian ancestry, when Mountain Jews are actually descended from Persian Jews.
The decision to cast Bedouin/Hashemites as "proto-Jews" was especially seen as political in nature, considering that both have origins in Arab tribes from the Arabian Peninsula rather than from the Ancient Israelites, while the descent of the Jews from the Israelites is largely accepted.
The study was also criticized as interpreting information selectively—The study found far more genetic similarity between the Druze and Ashkenazim than the Ashkenazim and Armenians, but Elhaik rejected this as indicating a common Semitic origin, instead interpreting it as evidence of Druze having Turkic origins when they are known to come from Syria.
Geneticists conducting studies in Jewish genetics have challenged Elhaik's methods in his first paper. Michael Hammer called Elhaik's premise "unrealistic," calling Elhaik and other Khazarian hypothesis proponents "outlier folks… who have a minority view that’s not supported scientifically. I think the arguments they make are pretty weak and stretching what we know."
Marcus Feldman, director of Stanford University's Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies, echoes Hammer. "If you take all of the careful genetic population analysis that has been done over the last 15 years… there’s no doubt about the common Middle Eastern origin," he said. He added that Elhaik’s first paper "is sort of a one-off." Elhaik’s statistical analysis would not pass muster with most contemporary scholars, Feldman said: "He appears to be applying the statistics in a way that gives him different results from what everybody else has obtained from essentially similar data."
Elhaik and Wexler's 2016 study was challenged by two prominent scholars of Jewish demography from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Shaul Stampfer, a professor of Soviet and East European Jewry, deemed it “basically nonsense.”
Sergio DellaPergola, the primary demographer of the Jewish people at the university, called it a "falsification", criticizing its methodology, using a small population size and selectively removing population groups that refuted the findings they wanted, namely other Jewish groups such as the Italkim and Sephardic Jews, to whom Ashkenazi Jews are closely related genetically. “Serious research would have factored in the glaring genetic similarity between Sephardim and Ashkenazim, which mean Polish Jews are more genetically similar to Iraqi Jews than to a non-Jewish Pole.”
Unless we look at the actual data, know what logarithms and models they used to analyze it, and know the assumptions of those models, we don't got a clue what they're talking about.
It goes without saying that there's going to be a lot of pushback. But eventually it will become common knowledge. It's been evident to anyone with common sense that the Ashkenazi do not have Middle Eastern heritage. They're *way* too white.
I don't believe the descendants of the Biblical Israelites stayed cohesive much past 500AD, if that long. They were essentially a nomadic people wandering all over Europe and Russia.
80 generations later, they're gone. As mentioned, it's only common sense.
And by the way,..wikipedia is an incredibly corrupted source.
During the time of Christ, the total population of the Earth was only 170 million people,...and the Biblical Israelites were a very small fraction of that.
To think that a very small nomadic group such as that could maintain genetic purity throughout a 2000 year span when the Earth's population expanded to 7 billion people is ridiculous.
During the time of Christ, the total population of the Earth was only 170 million people,...and the Biblical Israelites were a very small fraction of that.
To think that a very small nomadic group such as that could maintain genetic purity throughout a 2000 year span when the Earth's population expanded to 7 billion people is ridiculous.
Yet you yourself divide up those 7.5 (??) billion people on the basis of genetics, always have.
The original Christians were obviously composed of Biblical Israelites. Common sense says that there's many people in the world today who have as much (or more) DNA from the Biblical Israelites than the Ashkenazi yet have never considered themselves Jewish.
Unless they've had their DNA analyzed, they're probably unaware of it. I'm sure a lot would show up in some Italians,..since Rome was the first large group outside of the Biblical Israelites to have the Messiah's message given to them,...by Paul.
Not understanding the genetic data, models and assumptions used, you have no basis for that assertion.
Quote
It's been evident to anyone with common sense that the Ashkenazi do not have Middle Eastern heritage. They're *way* too white.
Yet we got blue-eyed people there 5,000 years before Abraham. I woulda thought the concept of a WHITE Chosen People woulda had you turning handsprings in celebration.
Quote
Idon't believe the descendants of the Biblical Israelites stayed cohesive much past 500AD, if that long. They were essentially a nomadic people wandering all over Europe and Russia.
80 generations later, they're gone. As mentioned, it's only common sense.
Through my forefathers I have an unbroken line of descent, in my case it’s called the “Celtic Y”. Through my female forebearers I have all my mom’s mitochondrial RNA, hence a traceable female line.
Ain’t it 15% of the World’s population of men provably descended from Gengis Khan? And he was just one guy.
Quote
And by the way,..wikipedia is an incredibly corrupted source.
With regards to the credibility of source material ya gotta be aware of the irony inherent in you making that statement.
With regards to wiki, it’s only as good as the references cited and whoever edited it last. The link I gave is well referenced and seems quite comprehensive, giving both sides of the argument. Unlike for example the rather strange link provided in your original post.
et we got blue-eyed people there 5,000 years before Abraham. I woulda thought the concept of a WHITE Chosen People woulda had you turning handsprings in celebration
Ah yes, the self-Chosenites.
God likes them more than anybody else...in fact the rest of us are on par with cattle and should be treated accordingly. Ask any Goldberg.
You're obviously not familiar with how the test data is composed.
Ancestry.com linked me to relatives that I knew existed, but I've never met them. It also accurately composed the way that I was related to them and went back to the common ancestor we shared.
could be theres a difference in accuracy between sorting out 3rd cousins in america, with lots of data, and going back 2000 years without much data?
Somebody need to PM Remsen and let him know he a gentile.
It's funny, I just got the results of my DNA test. It said I am from Kentucky. The jokes on them, though, because the DNA sample I sent them was used toilet paper.
15 pages of this stuff and all I've learned is that Jews are smarter than uneducated low-lifes like Bristoe. I wonder if the DNA tests have a catgegory for ignorant low lifes.
So what's your point and where's the evidence for whatever your point turns out to be?
You have no understanding of the evidence pro or com, I may have marginally more understanding than you but not much.
You were prob’ly just cued on to a highly suspect website by some White Nationalist online buddies and trumpeted it here is all. That Arab Israeli guy is prob’ly a star to whatever you guys call yourselves now.
Pushed back against here, ya started calling people “Jews” which is sorta funny and pathetic all at once.
So what's your point and where's the evidence for whatever your point turns out to be?
You have no understanding of the evidence pro or com, I may have marginally more understanding than you but not much.
You were prob’ly just cued on to a highly suspect website by some White Nationalist online buddies and trumpeted it here is all. That Arab Israeli guy is prob’ly a star to whatever you guys call yourselves now.
Pushed back against here, ya started calling people “Jews” which is sorta funny and pathetic all at once.
I never said they weren't Jews. If they want to be Jews they can be Jews. You can be a Jew. I can be a Jew. Sammy Davis Junior can be a Jew.
Being a Jew doesn't mean that you can trace your linage back to the Biblical Israelites.
There’s lotsa folks confused about their ancestrial lineage. There never ceases to be an abundance of white boys, and girls, claiming descendence from one of many assorted Cherokee “princesses”.
Truth be known that Princess’ name was prolly Liza Jane or something similar.
There’s lotsa folks confused about their ancestrial lineage. There never ceases to be an abundance of white boys, and girls, claiming descendence from one of many assorted Cherokee “princesses”.
Truth be known that Princess’ name was prolly Liza Jane or something similar.
Yeah,...my linage turned out to be much more English than Irish,..which surprised me. There's a lot of gingers in my bunch and there's some Irish. But I got a bigger hit of the English.
Mom's side should be about half Polish and the other half Welsh and a little Irish. Dads may be a grab bag? I know there is some German and some Irish. The rest? Who knows!
Wife's is a big mystery. Spanish and wagon burner for sure. Possibly a good dose of Finnish as well.
People who constantly rave about their ancestorial lineage remind me of the potato. The best part about them is underground!!!
You lot should be pleased I am not a Jew as I would foreclose on the lot of you and disrupt your internet connection.
Makes as much sense as some of the other crap being posted here.
Which part do you consider "crap"?
Every part that suggests it is more than a guess and somehow important enough to define ones view of oneself.
I've seen enough to know that it's more than a guess.
As for how it defines somebody, or how someone uses their linage (or assumed linage) to define themselves,...yeah, that's obviously questionable these days.
,...and some people aren't pleased with the answers.
People who constantly rave about their ancestorial lineage remind me of the potato. The best part about them is underground!!!
You lot should be pleased I am not a Jew as I would foreclose on the lot of you and disrupt your internet connection.
Makes as much sense as some of the other crap being posted here.
Which part do you consider "crap"?
Every part that suggests it is more than a guess and somehow important enough to define ones view of oneself.
I've seen enough to know that it's more than a guess.
As for how it defines somebody, or how someone uses their linage (or assumed linage) to define themselves,...yeah, that's obviously questionable these days.
,...and some people aren't pleased with the answers.
The problem Bristoe is that the info interpretation changes often enough to put the whole shebang in the "guess" category.
There’s lotsa folks confused about their ancestrial lineage. There never ceases to be an abundance of white boys, and girls, claiming descendence from one of many assorted Cherokee “princesses”.
Truth be known that Princess’ name was prolly Liza Jane or something similar.
Yeah,...my linage turned out to be much more English than Irish,..which surprised me. There's a lot of gingers in my bunch and there's some Irish. But I got a bigger hit of the English.
Our son's wife bought him the 23andMe home genetic test for his last birthday and his results came back as 99.6 % Northern European.
All three of our kids have fair skin, blonde hair and blue eyes as does (should say did on the hair color now though) my wife and she has a documented direct bloodline Delaware Indian woman ancestor a ways back in her family ancestry.
It's not uncommon for full siblings and even identical twins, triplets, quads, etc., to have variances in their genetic test results
Red hair or "Gingers" and blue or green eyes is about as common in other northern as well as some middle European ethic groups as it is in the native born Irish.
A good many more native Irish don't have red hair than those that do, too.
The problem Bristoe is that the info interpretation changes often enough to put the whole shebang in the "guess" category.
Some relatives on my mother's side have been very involved with genealogy for years. It's been fairly easy to document the past 150 years or so, because a large part of the family has been living in the same area of western Kentucky for that long.
Many of my extended family on that side has sent DNA samples into ancestry.com. The results they came up with and the relatives they matched me to are pretty much 100% correct through several generations. Quite possibly more. But the family doesn't have exact documentation past that long.
It was very interesting to go to distant relatives trees and find photographs of my great grandparents that I had never seen before.
The problem Bristoe is that the info interpretation changes often enough to put the whole shebang in the "guess" category.
Some relatives on my mother's side have been very involved with genealogy for years. It's been fairly easy to document the past 200 years or so, because a large part of the family has been living in the same area of western Kentucky for that long.
Many of my extended family on that side has sent DNA samples into ancestry.com. The results they came up with and the relatives they matched me to are pretty much 100% correct through several generations. Quite possibly more. But the family doesn't have exact documentation past that long.
It was very interesting to go to distant relatives trees and find photographs of my great grandparents that I had never seen before.
I am pleased for you, but you seem to have forgotten your original post and it's contents.
There’s lotsa folks confused about their ancestrial lineage. There never ceases to be an abundance of white boys, and girls, claiming descendence from one of many assorted Cherokee “princesses”.
Truth be known that Princess’ name was prolly Liza Jane or something similar.
Yeah,...my linage turned out to be much more English than Irish,..which surprised me. There's a lot of gingers in my bunch and there's some Irish. But I got a bigger hit of the English.
Our son's wife bought him the 23andMe home genetic test for his last birthday and his results came back as 99.6 % Northern European.
All three of our kids have fair skin, blonde hair and blue eyes as does (should say did on the hair color now though) my wife and she has a documented direct bloodline Delaware Indian woman ancestor a ways back in her family ancestry.
It's not uncommon for full siblings and even identical twins, triplets, quads, etc., to have variances in their genetic test results
Red hair or "Gingers" and blue or green eyes is about as common in other northern as well as some middle European ethic groups as it is in the native born Irish.
A good many more native Irish don't have red hair than those that do, too.
REmember seeing an article a couple years ago where studies were raising quesions about whether the red hair in Ireland was really "Irish" or if it was mostly brought there by the Normans and viking invasions.
Political censorship on Facebook appears to be far more extreme than anyone could have imagined. And it should come as no surprise that this censorship is all directed towards conservatives.
Ya, some Arab Israeli guy with an axe to grind puts out a website without any explanation of his data analysis for the benefit of those who wouldn’t take the time to read it anyway and the WHOLE world changed. Or will change, whatever.......
Freude, schöner Götterfunken, Tochter aus Elisium, Wir betreten feuertrunken, Himmlische, dein Heiligthum. Deine Zauber binden wieder, Was die Mode streng getheilt, ALLEN MENCHEN WERDEN BRÜDER Wo dein sanfter Flügel weilt.
I watch Hogan’s Hero’s every night. Don’t understand a word y’all saying.
I think you’re witnessing the discovery of google translate by a couple Boomers.
2/3’s of mine are still from memory. But I have LOTS of problems with spelling issues. Both languages.
And I have found lots of dialect issues with google. But they are damn useful!!
Edit!!!
One of the things I am thankful for. Lots of old german speakers here in old days. Hell I still have Texanishe Deutsche conversations with the old friends in the grocery store. Usually quite comical.
But,,,,,, Mrs. Bartsch is in same assisted living home as wifey. Everytime I see her I converse with her auf Deutsche. She has alzheimers bad. She just looks at me and smiles! And says "sehr gut!" I onow she understands.
I’ve been opening champagne bottles with my sabre tonight. Didn’t mean to hijack the thread.
It ain’t nighttime, it’s evening, not quite dusk, and the heathens cleaned out all the Liberty Creek Merlot from the local HEB Memorial Day weekend, left me with Cabernet, ain’t the same thing.
At least no skeeters on the front porch, seems they’re all inside the house.
" Yiddish and Hebrew are often thought to be closely related languages because of their shared script, and because they are both connected with the Jewish people. But the truth is that Yiddish and Hebrew and basically unrelated to each other. Hebrew is a Semitic language, most closely related with Arabic, while Yiddish is a Germanic language most closely related to German."
I’ve been opening champagne bottles with my sabre tonight. Didn’t mean to hijack the thread.
It ain’t nighttime, it’s evening, not quite dusk, and the heathens cleaned out all the Liberty Creek Merlot from the local HEB Memorial Day weekend, left me with Cabernet, ain’t the same thing.
At least no skeeters on the front porch, seems they’re all inside the house.
Dunno what SIL did sprayed hell outta place. Mosquitoes and flies are history. Done finished off the champagne and several bottles of vino! Wish you was here birdy!! Bedroom available. Same goes for the rest of you blackguards ! Even you Deflave!!
Already did Ancestry.com, I’m 80% Irish, Southwest County Cork, nearly 20% North of England with a tad of Swedish.
No surprises. Only known family member who did it was my cousin through my dad’s half-sister, they got the degree of relation exact. All the other hits were still in Ireland.
When a baby is conceived by the combining of one sperm cell with one egg cell, the baby receives 23 chromosomes from each parent, for a total of 46 chromosomes. Sometimes, an accident in the production of a sperm or egg cell causes that cell to contain 24 chromosomes. This event is referred to as nondisjunction. When this defective cell is involved in the conception of a baby, that baby will have a total of 47 chromosomes. The extra chromosome in Down syndrome is labeled number 21.
When a baby is conceived by the combining of one sperm cell with one egg cell, the baby receives 23 chromosomes from each parent, for a total of 46 chromosomes. Sometimes, an accident in the production of a sperm or egg cell causes that cell to contain 24 chromosomes. This event is referred to as nondisjunction. When this defective cell is involved in the conception of a baby, that baby will have a total of 47 chromosomes. The extra chromosome in Down syndrome is labeled number 21.
...Among the most widely spoken Jewish languages to develop in the diaspora are Yiddish, Ladino, and the Judæo-Arabic group of languages. Yiddish is the Judeo-German language developed by Ashkenazi Jews who lived in Central and Eastern Europe before the Holocaust. Ladino, also called Judezmo and Muestra Spanyol, is the Judeo-Spanish language developed by Sephardic Jews who lived in the Iberian peninsula before the Spanish inquisition. Judeo-Catalan (also called Catalanic or Qatalanit), was the Jewish language spoken by the Jewish communities in Catalonia, Valencia, and the Balearic Islands. Judeo-Provençal (or Shuadit) was the Occitan language as it was historically spoken by French Jews although it was not a distinct language, and was indistinguishable from the Occitan spoken by non-Jews.[13]
Many ancient and distinct Jewish languages, including Judaeo-Georgian, Judeo-Arabic, Judeo-Berber, Krymchak and Judeo-Malayalam have largely fallen out of use due the impact of the Holocaust on European Jewry, the Jewish exodus from Arab lands, the assimilation policies of Israel in its early days and other factors.
Yiddish was the language spoken by the largest number of Jews in the 1850s, but today the three most commonly spoken languages among Jews are English, modern Hebrew, and Russian—in that order.[14]. Yiddish, as well as several other Jewish languages, has contributed to the vocabulary of coterritorial non-Jewish languages, such as English or French[15].
Kol Israel (Israel's public service broadcaster) has long maintained daily short news and features programming in many Jewish languages and dialects. For domestic audiences it broadcast in Iraqi Jewish Arabic (Yahudi) on its Arabic network. While producing: Yiddish, Ladino, Moroccan Jewish Arabic (Mughrabi or Marocayit), Bukharian (Central Asian dialect) and Judeo-Tat for both to domestic and overseas shortwave audiences in relevant areas. In addition, for over two decades from the late 1970s a daily 30 minute shortwave transmission was made to Yemen in Yemenite Jewish Arabic.
Radio Exterior de España, the Spanish International Public broadcaster, provides programming in Ladino, which they refer to as Sefardi.[16]
In the United States there are some local radio programs in Yiddish as there are also in Birobidzhan in Russia.
Judæo-Marathi (Marathi: जुदाव मराठी) is a form of Marathi spoken by the Bene Israel, a Jewish ethnic group that developed a unique identity in India and in Pakistan. Judæo-Marathi is, like other Marathi, written in the Devanagari script. It may not be sufficiently different from Marathi as to constitute a distinct language, although it is characterized by a number of loanwords from Hebrew and Aramaic as a result of influence from the Cochin Jewish community, Judæo-Malayalam and Portuguese and also some influence from the Urdu language.....
I cut another Hawthorn tree out of the fencerow today and I'm whupped,......actually got through it without having to buy a new box of Bandaids.
Hawthorn wood is pretty dense. It was tough pushing the limbs through my chipper.
Twelve mile loop on a bicycle ballasted to 80lbs this morning, run into at just-retired Cop and firearms instructor also on a bicycle.
We are stopped talking about a half mile down the street from my school when a top student bales out of his mom’s car and approaches me desperate. The SAT starts at school in 15 minutes and, in a building chock full of computers and printers the fuggin moron in charge won’t let him print off the admission slip he didn’t know he needed.
Serendipity I was there at all, we jet down the street to school, print off his admit slip in my classroom with minutes to spare. Followed by a long hot and humid afternoon at the Alamo. A bunch of orange-robed Bhuddist monks from Thailand today. Took group photos but wouldn’t touch my guns. After that a wild evening at the laundromat.
The plan is to put 40 miles on that 80lb bike tomorrow morning, and then go pick up the grandkid as per usual. She just recently ditched the training wheels on her bike, wants to go bike riding again.
Central time reaches clear to the New Mexico State line here in Texas, only El Paso is on Mountain Time..Wierdest time zone is in Arizona, which is on pacific time, but this gives them an extra hour in the morning before it gets too hot and one less hour of way-too-friggin-hot in the afternoon.
On an unrelated topic I read once that Indians on the warpath who needed to wake up early would drink water before sleeping so that their bladders would wake em up. Works with Cabernet too.
Purple martins fly up into the pre-dawn sky to sing from over their nest sites during the breeding season. Nice to listen to, but they quit when the young have left the nest. Still good numbers up there this morning, but in three weeks they’ll all be gone. Always sad to hear em fade out, that means all we got left are three months of too hot before the second half of October gets here.