Originally Posted by KyWindageII
Originally Posted by Calhoun
Carbon dioxide emissions:

[Linked Image]

Atmospheric carbon dioxide:
http://popularlogistics.com/2013/05/atmospheric-co2-400-ppm/
[Linked Image]

Global temps:

[Linked Image]


So over approximately the last 12 years we've had a 23% increase in CO2 emissions, we've had a 10% increase in atmospheric CO2 levels...

And we've had a 0% increase in global temperature.

But the science is settled, and no discussion will be allowed.



So do you just ignore that the long term trend of CO2 concentrations and heat are increasing? Your graphs.


Yes, because the false models don't account for negative offsets. They are static and cannot account for clouds, their depth, area coverage and duration. The greenies will only show what they believe will trick the average taxpayer into going green - like Gun Geek who posted his drivel again.

They have over sold the false science. Since 1970 we have been told we are on the edge, next year is it, the glaciers will be gone in X years, we can't afford to ignore the science - on and on with their bullcrap.

Doesn't anyone think it curious that all "solutions" become more regulations, costlier substitutes, less free markets and subsidies to the green companies less freedom to the consumer.

The average American has NO science acumen and wouldn't know a greenhouse gas from a popcorn fart.



My home is the "sanctuary residence" for my firearms.