Miles, it would be helpful if you could focus precisely on what specific statement I made in this thread (actual quotes, please) with which you so vehemently disagree. That would help us to have a discussion, rather than a mere pissing contest. Start, if you would, with one statement (assuming there's more than one). Then we can discuss its merits and/or demerits before moving on to any other point on which you take issue.
why so when you start getting you arse handed to you you start arguing semantics so you can try and save face? every time it devolves to a Clinton-esq "depends on what your definition of is is"
