Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
Originally Posted by blammer
spoke to the kind lady at Springfield today. I sent her the picture in the first post and asked if she would show it to their technicians to see what they had to say.

Here is the reply I received.

Dear MR........

I have had a chance to conference with my Technician about the photos you shared. He does not see anything alarming in the photos in regards to the size of the chamber or the fit of the cartridge. There should be no issues related to the function of the firearm for you or any future owner.

He believes that the reason the casings are so damaged is because the ammo is running hot.

Thank you and have a nice day!

ok, good enough for me, the gun is for sale.

Ridiculous. That much of the case is unsupported, and that's how they designed it?? I'm disgusted. It's going to keep shearing off case heads with anything approaching a full-power round. In a 380, I might be okay with that much case sticking out, but in a 9 running 35K+ psi, it's going to damage most cases beyond reloading, and shear them regularly.

I would contact Hornady and get them involved next. Then I'd call a lawyer.


What is a lawyer going to do for you?

Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot


I would contact Hornady and get them involved next. Then I'd call a lawyer.


Over $94?

Originally Posted by cra1948
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot


I would contact Hornady and get them involved next. Then I'd call a lawyer.


Over $94?


Lawyer, expert witnesses....shouldn't cost more than a hundred grand to get some satisfaction and maybe, just maybe get the cost of the pistol reimbursed.

Defective/dangerous product. How do you think products get corrected when the company yawns and then charges for repairs when faced with a faulty design that's already on the market? Would you want your daughter, or one of your grandchildren firing that pistol?


In order to make any point in a lawsuit, you have to show damages. So far, we have a $94 repair bill and maybe some bruises. Maybe Blammer can claim some emotional stress 'cause he got skeered a little (for a minute there). Maybe you'd like to fund the tort claim process for part of the winnings?

No, you don't have to "show damages" amounting to only the cash outlay for repair.

Example: you buy a new truck. You drive it home. On the way, the brakes fail, and you wreck into your front yard tree. You call up the manufacturer/dealer and describe what happened. You know the brakes failed. They look at it and tell you the brakes are fine, and charge you for repairs, then tell you to come get it. Is the problem here the expense of the thing, or is it your fear for your safety if you try to drive the truck again, or is it both, plus the manufacturer's disregard of the problem too?


I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.