Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Originally Posted by slumlord
We don't have that problem Tn

See that feeents rat therr...stay the fk on the other side of it


There ain't much public land available.

You better either own land and live on it, be a ptsd mooching remf, and/or kiss a lot of ass and beg to hunt on someone's private land.
Idaho has about 50k square miles of public land. For the most part, nat. forest isn't broken up too much but BLM land is a hodgepodge of public and private. Fences on rangeland here mean nothing. Much private land isn't fenced and there are many fences on public land to separate grazing allotments.



Out here, the forest service is the managing agency and the BLM is the administrating agency for the National Forests....the green/white checkerboard on land status maps denotes white for private and green for public...most of the private land in the national forest here is from land grants to the railroad companies back in the day.... today,it is owned primarily by "fruit growers" aka "Sierra Pacific" until it is logged and then some of it is retained and some sold to large investment and insurance companies....unless a person were to check the land status maps at the BLM, then go to the county recorder to see who actually owns it, you wouldn't have a clue it was private land. Enforcement of trespassing laws (for unposted land) within national forests, would effectively shut down ANY outdoors activities in them around here....