So, citing the South African Constitution as superior...
Superior in what sense? The Soviet constitution guaranteed more personal rights than ours and superior in that sense but we don't ignore our constitution. Also ours is poorly written in the sense it is ambiguous as hell with all the compromising in getting it to pass. Why Ruth has her job. Superior maybe but preferable to live under? No.
How about superior in what it says versus one allowing total reallocation of personal and private property based only on race. Ours may be vague, but that is mostly due to bad intent on the part of would-be manipulators.
The concept suggesting livibility of the Constitution is not every bit as important as its mandate is laughable.
