Wolf populations have only recovered in Minnesota and Wisconsin, yet the Fish and Wildlife Service wants to withdraw protections for wolves even in places where the populations have not yet recovered! Doesn't sound like a good idea to me!
A lot of good ideas probably don't seem good to you. Is it a good idea to spend millions of taxpayer dollars to plant "new wolves" - that actually are hybrids with other species - to do damage in the midst of ranch and agricultural areas, particularly when they have never learned to hunt and kill their natural prey? And, after all of that wasted expense and propaganda huffing by bureaucrats and self-proclaimed "environmentalists", these things here still cannot proliferate as "wolves". These animals have merely been a tool in a typical ant-establishment ploy - bad behavior by poor citizens. Is that a good idea?
