My facts come from many sources, all of which I can easily cite. Just because he has credentials does not outweigh the opinions of credentialed others, but facts are pesky and he denies many tenets of orthodox opinion in his specialty. I am willing to argue his points but I am not going to toss you a headline and a link and call that a discussion or debate.
I am not going to use the fact he has a minority opinion among his peers, either. But if you have a specific point you want to make based on his actual points I would be happy to explain why I think he is wrong. More to the point why he is using different statistics. And bluntly, no one will really know who is right for a while.
Another good post citing actual, and not emotional, facts.
And another showing an inability to engage in rational discussion.
LOL
Bullshitters and thieves get a little emotional, when there's no facts.
As do fuuuccckkkinn liars such as yourself.
You’ve got nothing on anyone here. If you’ll lie, you’ll steal putting you squarely where you belong.
![[Linked Image from media.giphy.com]](https://media.giphy.com/media/GpyS1lJXJYupG/giphy.gif)
