Originally Posted by ratsmacker
Name all the rich and successful countries in sub-Saharan Africa.


Rhodesia?

All of the former colonies are useful examples. Is it better to let indigenous Africans have the “liberty” to rule themselves, even if it means mass starvation and endless civil war and disease?

Or let Whites govern, build infrastructure, and plan a society that minimizes misery and death for the majority of inhabitants at the “cost” of requiring, at least temporarily, a caste system?

Someone posted the movie Empire of Dust here a few days ago. Watch that, and Africa Addio and if you still believe it is better for blacks to rule themselves, I feel bad for both them and you.