Interesting, I have owned a half-dozen of them and including a couple of 270's, I have handled lots of others but I have never seen the version with the sight dovetail cut into the breech. I don't believe I would want one like that for the reasons you stated. Also in looking at it closely the sight is mounted backwards - Wow!!
drover
Yeah, and the
If you compare the picture of the OP's rifle with the one in the advertisement, not the position of the rear sight. The OP's sight is on the barrel while the one in the ad is on the breech. I have a few M50s and only one was a .270. It had a deep cut in the top of the breech for the rear sight. This bothered me for two reasons. One it looked funny like maybe somebody screwed up plus the fact that I was not all that comfortable with rough 60KPIS that close to my face and a thin spot right where the highest pressures would be. That rifle is not a 7x57 BTW. They must have made a change to the style on the OP's rifle fairly quickly and I haven't seen one with the dovetail over the breech since that .270.
I've owned a few of the pre-64 M70s and frankly, I'd take the J.C. Higgins M50/51 over the M70 any day and twice on Sunday.
Paul B.
Interesting, I have owned a half-dozen of them and including a couple of 270's, I have handled lots of others but I have never seen the version with the sight dovetail cut into the breech. I don't believe I would want one like that for the reasons you stated. Also in looking at it closely the sight is mounted backwards - Wow!!
drover
Yea, I wouldn't fret too much about the whole high pressure thing, You do know that the threaded shank is a whole lot smaller, especially at the bottoms of the threads, than that dovetail cut is, right? Never really cared for teh way the sight looked like it was backward though.
