She upheld a bolognavirus lockdown in IL.
Anybody too stupid ta see through the bolo-19 bullshit is too stupid ta be on the SC.
Her thoughts on the virus have nothing to do with the decision. The decision is on the governments ability to address a health threat. That ability is well founded in prior SC decisions going all the way back to the late 1700's. The same way they can put someone in an asylum for TB or force a small pox vaccination.
Granted, the Covid is overblown. But this decision effects the future when it could be very real.
Not.
Governmental regulations have to serve a legitimate .gov interest, to be Constitutional.
Lockin up healthy people has never been legitimate, and never been held Constitutional.
And, it wasn't Constitutional in this case, either.
She voted in favor of big government, because it *was* the government.
The left's gonna love her, if she gets in.
