No, you can sum up your case in a few sentences, if you have a case.
I have no case, only an opinion derived from reading his book which you could do yourself. I have no interest in debating his "ethics or patriotism" either. The man was a grovelling sycophant to a power structure that did huge damage to the average American's faith in our govt. and led to Carter's disastrous presidency. After exiting prison he wrapped himself in the flag and preyed on naive conservatives.
YMMV
mike r
I presented the positives of Liddy in a few sentences. You could have come back with the gist of your case in several sentences.
Rather than come back with your negatives, you refuse to give any facts. Just as I figured, this is because you have no case.
If it makes you feel warm and cozy to think that G. Gordon Liddy is a fraud, good for you I hope that makes you sleep well at night.
