Ruger rifles have been a hit and miss as far as accuracy for me. Some are fairly accurate and some not so much. One of the most accurate was a 280 I bought in '76 or '77. The last Hawkeye has been so-so - I'm still working on it. But there's been quite a bit of effort so far with mediocre results - I may re-barrel it. I have a 7mm RM, a tanger, that I got some decent accuracy after a bit of work.
I don't suppose a guy would need sub MOA with a 375, but still. I guess I don't look at rifles as tools, though I guess they are. I need to feel proud of what I'm shooting.
My pre-64 375 H&H AI shoots very well, by the way.
Until Ruger began hammer forging their own barrels you never knew how accurate they would be. But today's Ruger's , including all the 375 and 416 Ruger's, don't have that problem.
The Kimbers however also suffer from quality control/accuracy issues and are not known for their ruggedness. Ruger's are.
