I have a 21 pound test platform that measures 1 3/16" dia at the end of the straight 26" barrel. This eliminates most of the variation I'm likely to induce into the system.
Aside from massive reams of data, the shooter, especially with a sporting rifle is w/o a doubt the weakest link in the system..........doing as above mitigates much of that issue.
Statistics like this can drive a sane person mad if you let it.
Compromises have to be made & each shooter, more or less, has to come to grips with his system & what he is willing to do or accept.
I'm not a target shooter, so my needs are less stringent than what an F Class shooter's might be.
Jack Leuba is a honcho at KAC (Knight's Armament) who supplies a lot of ordnance to SF type people. This is an interesting article with a slightly different tack that some shooters might find interesting.
Let's Talk AccuracyMM
