You seem stuck on that one instance, and it sure disagrees with everything else I've ever learned about PILT.
You got that area of the Constitution that allows the fedgovs to own more land than anyone else in the US yet?
I didn't think so.
Article IV and Supreme court decisions...I'm not your secretary.
Ag land in most states have reduced tax rates, and for reasons that are obvious to anyone with a single firing brain cell...and I agree with the rates.
PILT in Wyoming pays substantially more, another thing I agree with.
Go find something else to bitch about or educate yourself if you want a serious discussion.
You are entitled to your socialistic opinion. It's well known here.
Seems the only time you dare show your face is when your commie policies are at risk.
Serious discussion, or not, I'll damn sure voice my opposition to things I know are wrong. If you don't care for that, you can GFY.
Clear enough?
My opinion is supported by facts and supreme court decisions regarding federal land ownership.
Tax rates and PILT are what they are, again based on facts.
If you want to challenge and change that, well, get off your ass and get with it. Your opinion amounts to exactly jack diddly chit.
I'm happy with federal land, happy about the legal precedence of same. Have no grievance with the taxes I pay, and happy to live in Wyoming surrounded by public lands.
I can't help people like you who seem miserable and unhappy with just about everything in your life.
It has to be tough to be such a miserable wretch, sitting on your ass, complaining about things you know you're not only wrong about, but are helpless to change in any way.
Glad to not be in your shoes...it would suck, big-time.
Clear enough?
