No bias in that article, nooooooo, none at all.
75% of all fish consumed in the world is farm raised. Telling people they should eat wild fish is a childish argument: there's isn't enough to go around. And given the price of much of the wild stuff, it's financially out of reach of a large portion of the population.
So, the proper question is: how does farmed fish compare to the alternative: Chicken, pork, beef?
When you compare the nutritional profile of fish to other protein sources, fish, whatever kind, does pretty darn well.
I mean, really, feeding a child a tilapia fillet or a McDonalds hamburger? What do you think is going to be better?
I'll just keep feeding the fish -- people sure like eating them....
There's a hell of a lot more wild fish that are caught, stripped of eggs and left to rot on the beach by our local indians. Even a wild Chum or pink (saltwater caught) is a hell of a lot better table fare for city folks than the farm raised chit. Not to mention how much of OUR wild caught fish is exported to Asia for high $$$$ restuarants for the fat and rich...
