Lets calm down, and think of what those Canadians that were polled might have meant by that line of thought.
As everyone knows - the way the question is phrased or delivered has a huge effect on the answer you recieve.
If you look at it in the context, of which man, would be more likely - to provoke the next big conflict in the world - who would it be?
A radical Islamist trying to wage a war from some rat infested cave somewhere in the Tora Bora mountains - or the man who controls the largest military in the history of mankind - a man, who believes that starting "pre-emptive" strikes on countries he dislikes - can be a good thing?
Osama is a bit player. George Bush is not.
It's as simple as that.
