I dunno why anyone would punch out any .300 H&H to Weatherby these days. Back in the early days of Roy Weatherby's hype, sure, but if you want a .300 Weatherby these days there's no reason--especially since Ruger made the No. 1 in .300 Weatherby for a few years in the 90's. I had one, and it shot very well.
I had a No. 1 .300 H&H for a while, and it shot just as well as Gunner's. I intended to keep it--but then ran into a pre-'64 Model 70 Winchester in good but "hunting" shape (didn't want a collector) at close to the same price I could get for the Ruger....
Ya'll know how it is.
Of course, one could do this:
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=322789301and only 10 rounds fired...
