What's "unreasonable" is the consistent failure to read the English language. What's to be "well regulated" is the "militia",
meaning an army of citizens, which is what the US military is.
The need for the militia to be regulated-controlled and directed
by a standard or principle or rule- is what the amendment addresses.
The peoples' right to have & carry arms is to control/direct the
military-type actions, both by providing personnel to the militia, and resisting, if necessary.
Regulating the right isn't the issue at all. Regulating the government's actions, or potential mis-actions, is the issue.
