Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Bill Introduced to End Federal Marijuana Prohibition

It's so nice to see "conservatives" putting their collective knowledge to work on the in's and outs of the drug trade.

So special.

never realized how much was involved in growing that stuff.

It's so nice to see "conservatives" putting their collective knowledge to work on the in's and outs of the drug trade.

So special.

Biggest ish my advice to u. Stick to philosophy and politics. U ain't no farmer. LMAO.

Yeah, I'm there with ya. I didn't know about the male plants and all that. On the other hand, I go out of my way to NOT know about the drug trade. Believe me, that's not easy living here. Clearing the neighbors snow this winter, he mentions he rented some grow space for $20K on another property. Go up to the neighbor above our place to say hi and invite him to dinner, he's growing in his front lawn. All summer long last year chainsaws and log trucks clearing land above us for grows. Local market, stinky, rotten filthy scumbuckets smelling up the entire store. Local irrigation supplier that sells me my irrigation parts deals with growers, dozens of them a day come in wanting to know how to build drip irrigation systems.

Funny thing, stats are there's 2800 registered grow sites in Josephine County. Wait, I lost my train of thought. I can't remember anything funny.

never realized how much was involved in growing that stuff.

Conservative values starts and stops with the US Constitution, anything more and it's social warrior BS.

Not nearly as special as "conservatives" who favor federal control over state's rights.

What I always find interesting about these marijuana threads is that those who have never indulged much in smoking the stuff, or knowingly been around people who do, seem to be under the impression that it's a dangerous drug that causes laziness, sloppyness, craziness etc. My take is that lazy people are lazy...sloppy people are sloppy...dumbasses are dumbasses regardless of whether they indulge....or not.

That horse has been led to water... but it refuses to drink because it thinks the water is tainted with pot.

...Local market, stinky, rotten filthy scumbuckets smelling up the entire store...

Yep!

I was diagnosed with PTSD about a year after my accident... and a miserable year it was.

That's really the conversation - where do you want the control to be? At the federal, state or local level?

Does someone like a nationwide education policy? How about regulating homosexual marriage at the federal level so every state has to accept the will of Washington in that matter? Or would you rather have those decisions at the state level?

If California wants to let folks smoke dope while two men who identify as women engage in transgendered lesbian sex in the girls bathroom, that's for Californians to decide. If folks in Nebraska or Idaho or Michigan don't like that, why should they have to put up with it?

The red herring that always gets caught in these arguments is whether pot is good or bad or indifferent. We have these threads over and over and the same players post the same things, no one ever changes their opinion. But if you hate it or not, why let the federal government make a one size fits all policy toward it?

Why not let the residents of a state decide for themselves on each and every one of these social issues? There are still dry counties in the country where the sale of alcohol is banned, in other places it's allowed under different circumstances. In Idaho only state liquor stores can sell hard liquor, in Florida private stores are licensed to sell it.

Oregon allows the sale of recreational marijuana but allowed counties to opt out, that's why you see tons of pot shops in Western Oregon but Malheur county in very conservative Eastern Oregon has none. Bravo! They let the folks make the decision at the most local level possible.

Each state decided these social issues for themselves - pot or alcohol- and if they want to change it they can do so at the state level, and if the states are smart and it's feasible they delegate that decision down to an even more local level.


Just get the damn federal government out of these social issues. In fact get the damn federal government out of everything except those things that is beyond the power of individual states to effectively control, like national defense or interstate highways.


There will always be people who f*ck up their lives.
There will always be people who allow their irresponsibility to harm others.
And there will always be people who want more and more government - but ONLY when it controls all of those other irresponsible ass holes - leave MY liberty alone, thank you very much.


The government that governs least governs best.

You were dumb as fu ck before your accident.