24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,262
H
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,262
I only use Forster dies now.Run out is almost non existent using the Fl or NS and their seating dies are superior to all but custom made dies.


Its all right to be white!!
Stupidity left unattended will run rampant
Don't argue with stupid people, They will drag you down to their level and then win by experience
GB1

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,414
P
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
P
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,414
I have definitely had 7 mm RM and .300 Win Mag cases that would not load after neck resizing only. I used a FL sizing die to set the shoulder back .004 inch and in each case then they chambered -- but with more effort than new ammo. I admit I did not try to put these cases back in the chamber after firing. I'll do that next time.

So you are saying there is something wrong with my neck-sizing technique? What would that be?

Also, someone said to partial FL size to run the die down to the shell holder and then back off, I don't believe that will work. You have to run the die about one turn past contact and THEN back off some. But you need some device to measure how much you are setting the shoulder back.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,250
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,250
Originally Posted by postoak
I have definitely had 7 mm RM and .300 Win Mag cases that would not load after neck resizing only. I used a FL sizing die to set the shoulder back .004 inch and in each case then they chambered -- but with more effort than new ammo. I admit I did not try to put these cases back in the chamber after firing. I'll do that next time.

So you are saying there is something wrong with my neck-sizing technique? What would that be?

Also, someone said to partial FL size to run the die down to the shell holder and then back off, I don't believe that will work. You have to run the die about one turn past contact and THEN back off some. But you need some device to measure how much you are setting the shoulder back.


Nothing wrong with your neck sizing technique--ol' Dan_Oz is omitting the fact some brass doesn't spring back as much and all brass loses a tiny bit of it's elasticity every time we fire it.

Rarely will PFLR brass not chamber into the same rifle it was fired in. You want to bump the shoulder back .001-.002, and that will determine how far to screw the die down. I use Hornady/Stoney Point headspace gauge.

https://www.hornady.com/reloading/precision-measuring/precision-tools-and-gauges/headspace-comparator-anvil-base-kit#!/

In your case with belted magnums sometimes right above the belt isn't sized enough, especially after multiple firings. There is a die made to address that but cannot remember who makes it. Maybe somebody else can chime in.




Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,250
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,250

Of course, I'm' assuming you're using a neck die to size the neck rather than attempting it with a FL die.


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,414
P
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
P
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,414
Yes, I was using neck sizing dies, and since PFL sizing fixed the problem, the problem wasn't because of expansion ahead of the belt. Sinclair makes that die you are talking about.

IC B2

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Originally Posted by postoak
Yes, I was using neck sizing dies, [/b]and since PFL sizing fixed the problem, the problem wasn't because of expansion ahead of the belt.[b]. Sinclair makes that die you are talking about.


Do you see what I see ? (set to music)

In 40 PLUS years I've never had the problems mentioned in this thread.
P F L sizing works - if you know how to use it !

"It's easy to make loading hunting rounds hard "
We can OVERthink it pretty easily.

Jerry


jwall- *** 3100 guy***

A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap

Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,586
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,586
Originally Posted by postoak
I have definitely had 7 mm RM and .300 Win Mag cases that would not load after neck resizing only. I used a FL sizing die to set the shoulder back .004 inch and in each case then they chambered -- but with more effort than new ammo. I admit I did not try to put these cases back in the chamber after firing. I'll do that next time.

So you are saying there is something wrong with my neck-sizing technique? What would that be?


I'm not saying that you are doing something wrong, but there might be things you could do differently ;-)

The case, when you extracted it, fit the chamber. It simply can't be bigger than the chamber it just came out of, so if it won't go back in after you've reloaded it then it is a matter of understanding why. Among the likely causes, assuming it isn't a problem with the chamber, is the process used to reload. For example if the die you are using is one with an expander ball, pulled back through the neck as it comes out of the sizing die, then drag from that ball may well pull the neck forward, in turn moving the shoulder. Another possibility is if you are partially sizing with a FL die, but have it adjusted far enough that the part of the die meant for the sides of the case is coming into contact with the case, without the part meant for the shoulder itself coming into contact, thereby squeezing the shoulder forward slightly.

There can be other causes too, and I've mentioned a couple of them earlier in this thread.

It is entirely up to you though. I'm just describing what I've found, and what works for me.

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,586
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,586
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
--ol' Dan_Oz is omitting the fact some brass doesn't spring back as much and all brass loses a tiny bit of it's elasticity every time we fire it.


I omitted saying that because it is arrant nonsense. I covered this earlier in the thread.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,250
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,250
Originally Posted by dan_oz
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
--ol' Dan_Oz is omitting the fact some brass doesn't spring back as much and all brass loses a tiny bit of it's elasticity every time we fire it.


I omitted saying that because it is arrant nonsense. I covered this earlier in the thread.





But it's not arrant nonsense any metal including brass work hardens. And it doesn't matter if we squeeze it a lot with a die and lose a lot of elasticity or expand it a little with chamber pressure and lose a tiny amount each time.

I understand the difference between ductility and elasticity.

Although you may be correct a neck die can potentially pull the neck forward--which is why I lube the necks of my brass even when the neck die doesn't call for it. It's easy enough to measure if that happens with my Stony Point gauge.


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 223
B
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
B
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 223
Tag

IC B3

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,586
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,586
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by dan_oz
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
--ol' Dan_Oz is omitting the fact some brass doesn't spring back as much and all brass loses a tiny bit of it's elasticity every time we fire it.


I omitted saying that because it is arrant nonsense. I covered this earlier in the thread.





But it's not arrant nonsense any metal including brass work hardens. And it doesn't matter if we squeeze it a lot with a die and lose a lot of elasticity or expand it a little with chamber pressure and lose a tiny amount each time.



Work hardening doesn't "reduce elasticity" That is indeed arrant nonsense. It increases the yield stress, so you might actually say, in layman's terms, it increases the elasticity, in the sense that the stress range over which elastic behaviour is seen is increased, but the modulus of elasticity is unchanged, so you get more elastic strain before yielding. It also tends to decrease ductility


Originally Posted by alpinecrick
I understand the difference between ductility and elasticity.


I suspect that you don't.

Oh, and not all metals can be work hardened either.


Joined: May 2011
Posts: 890
3
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
3
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 890
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by dan_oz
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
--ol' Dan_Oz is omitting the fact some brass doesn't spring back as much and all brass loses a tiny bit of it's elasticity every time we fire it.


I omitted saying that because it is arrant nonsense. I covered this earlier in the thread.





But it's not arrant nonsense any metal including brass work hardens. And it doesn't matter if we squeeze it a lot with a die and lose a lot of elasticity or expand it a little with chamber pressure and lose a tiny amount each time.

I understand the difference between ductility and elasticity.

Although you may be correct a neck die can potentially pull the neck forward--which is why I lube the necks of my brass even when the neck die doesn't call for it. It's easy enough to measure if that happens with my Stony Point gauge.



Casey, what do you exactly mean by "losing" elasticity? I guess in 30+ years in the materials testing arena and having tested all sorts of engineering alloys, I'm curious to what you mean by "lose". I gather that Dan has a materials background and understands strain hardening, strain softening, elastic-perfectly plastic, Ramberg-Osgood, elastic unloading, consumed ductility, etc. and this may be his refined understanding of material mechanics.

Elasticity is the Hookean response of the material..ie the linear stress-strain response. To say a material "loses" that means it's modulus changes over strain cycling; which is absolutely not tne case for cartridge brass or a wide range of engineering alloys. Its proportional limit/yield strength (increases for strain hardening materials) will change assuming plasticity is reached and ductility is consumed. Subsequent plastic strain cycles will have a new characteristic stress-strain response if plasticity has been reached during previous cycles but its elasticity (linear response) will not change or be lost. The unloading stifness would clearly show that.

JF

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,414
P
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
P
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,414
Originally Posted by jwall
Originally Posted by postoak
Yes, I was using neck sizing dies, and since PFL sizing fixed the problem, the problem wasn't because of expansion ahead of the belt. Sinclair makes that die you are talking about.


Do you see what I see ? (set to music)

In 40 PLUS years I've never had the problems mentioned in this thread.
P F L sizing works - if you know how to use it !

"It's easy to make loading hunting rounds hard "
We can OVERthink it pretty easily.

Jerry


No one else saw what you saw Jerry because you didn't see what you think. I had problems neck sizing. PFL sizing FIXED the problem. I have never had problems with PFL sizing.

I was wrong about who makes that dies. Larry Willis of Innovative Technologies makes it.


Innovative Technologies

Last edited by postoak; 12/03/17.
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,414
P
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
P
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,414
Dan_Oz - so you admit that there can be a problem with regular neck sizing dies possibly pulling the shoulder forward. That seems to me a good reason why I might have had a problem EXCEPT I was using the Lee collet die on the 300 WM. Anyway, I am going to stick with PFL -- it works.

You obviously know a lot about metallurgy but gun writers have been talking about cases losing elasticity for as long as I can remember, so please excuse us for repeating things that so-called experts have written.

Regardless of whether it is reduced elasticity or ductility or something else, do cases become less likely to snap back into position after repeated firings?

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,801
Likes: 1
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,801
Likes: 1
without reading the entire thread...

neck size always... if the shoulder needs bumping back,
I use a body die for that....

or just a larger caliber with the spindle removed..
eg: a 260 without the spindle makes a perfect body die for 243..

anneal necks every 4th shooting...

don't go for max velocity most of the time, so that reduces
pressure and doesn't require the brass to worked as hard to
resize....

this gives me pretty accurate ammo, and also great brass life...

40-50 reloads or more...


"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC

“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez

Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,688
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,688
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
In my experience, and I have some cases that I've fired well over 20 times in bolt guns, if I anneal about every 5 firings, I can get away with using a Lee collet sizer only, and never have to worry about bumping back the shoulder to allow cases to easily go into the chamber upon bolt closing.



I did not know that but it makes sense. Will definitely be giving that a try 😀


Trystan


Good bullets properly placed always work, but not everyone knows what good bullets are, or can reliably place them in the field
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,250
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,250

Then I'm glad to know we will never have to anneal the necks of our brass again.........


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,250
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,250

JF,

Each time our brass is worked--in a die or in the chamber of our firearms--it loses a certain amount of it's ability to springback. That's elasticity as it applies to our brass.

Essentially oz is suggesting we will never have to do anything but neck size brass regardless if we shoot it a bazillion times. I'm not aware of anybody demonstrating that, and given handloaders willingness to tinker it should have been demonstrated a long time ago--if it was true.


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,250
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,250
Originally Posted by postoak


No one else saw what you saw Jerry because you didn't see what you think. I had problems neck sizing. PFL sizing FIXED the problem. I have never had problems with PFL sizing.

I was wrong about who makes that dies. Larry Willis of Innovative Technologies makes it.


Innovative Technologies


Thanks for reminding who makes those dies.

I saw your PFLR because I use it about half the time. I'm mostly interested in making lightweight hunting rifles as accurate as a I can, and to that end concentricity is the goal. I don't care how I get there whether NK sizing or PFLR. And like others I want my rounds to chamber easily and quickly because a fast follow-up shot is always a possibility--especially when jump shooting elk in the timber........


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,251
Likes: 6
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,251
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by postoak
Dan_Oz - so you admit that there can be a problem with regular neck sizing dies possibly pulling the shoulder forward. That seems to me a good reason why I might have had a problem EXCEPT I was using the Lee collet die on the 300 WM. Anyway, I am going to stick with PFL -- it works.




Can you tell us exactly how a Lee collet neck sizing die can yank the shoulders forward during use?


It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

597 members (1936M71, 222ND, 1lessdog, 160user, 17CalFan, 64 invisible), 2,320 guests, and 1,285 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,067
Posts18,482,557
Members73,959
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.114s Queries: 55 (0.008s) Memory: 0.9146 MB (Peak: 1.0372 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-01 21:18:27 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS