Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Pretty young girl walking her dogs

m stevenson,

GOOD. As I said to another "true believer" in the media's KNOWING LIES & MYTH: ADIOS.

NOBODY made me "important on this or any other thread BUT at least I am trained in dogs, know their nature, how to handle them & can tell TRUTH from LIES told by HATERS & LEFTIST "mass media" idiots.

yours, tex

I finally figured out where the "ignore" button was...

Now that’s funny.

Being a SON OF A BITCH does not count toward”being trained in dogs”.

Amen. Amazing how some have been around dogs all their life and aint learned chitt about them.

I wonder how many cockers, setters, Brittanys and beagles the army uses as guard and patrol dogs.

jaguartz,

And your point is?? Do you HAVE a valid point??

yours, tex

curdog4570,

One thing is certain: You are living breathing proof that you don't have to have long ears & a tail, to be a hateful/terminally ignorant/vulgar JACKASS.
(Laughing AT your cluelessness.)

yours, tex

You know i don't dont get involved in these pissing matches much anymore, but you are out of line mister. They only person on this thread coming across as what you just described is you.

Point is you cant make the mental leap to figure out why they dont. They dont normally make disableing, killing or disfiguring chomps.

I'll jump back in here. His point was: you choose a dog for the purpose at hand based on it's breeding, reputation, and heritage. You don't choose a beagle to defend, guard, and protect. You choose it to run the schit out of a rabbit. Nor do you choose a pit bull to serve as a therapy dog at the local children's hospital. Why not? I don't know - maybe because they're known to attack and kill things?

Alright alright, settle down there sensei / dog whisperer.

Thanks for swatting at that pesky little mosquito, Roger. Beware, he will have “one of the forum Leo’s reveal your criminal past.”

Do you know any Texans that call themselves “ Tex”?

Me neither.

Ask a junior high kid what it means when 6% of dog breeds cause 70% of dog related deaths.

The second victim was undoubtedly killed by his pomeranian. I guess people just destroy all their videos of viscious dogs unless they are pits, right?

Sheesh,

18 pages and counting the way my machine is set up, and we still haven't cleared this up?

Geno

Valsdad,

IF it goes to 100 pages, I seriously doubt that we will "have cleared this up".

yours, tex.

This thread is a my opinion/your opinion and never twixt the two shall meet.

Not unless you get your head out of its warm spot and admit that pit bulls are responsible for more injurious attacks and deaths than other breeds of dogs.

No, statistics give facts. Fact is some still think the improved economy is obongos work finally taking hold.

I once knew a guy who lived to 95 and smoked, so smoking isnt bad for folks.

What should I start referring to myself as........

Hamps?

This is bullshit, no good abbreviation.
George

Prwlr,

TRUE FACT.

I'm amused by people who try to make an analogy between ANY large breed & miniature/toy breeds. = NO "Teacup Poodles", Maltese, Cocker Spaniels, Yorkies, miniature poodles & other "little foo-foo dogs" are likely to cause much damage to anybody/anything as they don't have the body mass to do so, though they may be "ankle biters".

Otoh, most any working breed (or for that matter any dog over 25-30#) are capable of causing significant damage to people/property & if poorly trained/socialized CAN & MAY do so, if left to run loose.
(YEP, your "lovely, sweet as sugar FLUFFY", if running loose with a pack of dogs MAY cause great damage to people/livestock/property/wildlife.)

yours, tex