Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Canadian Woman Arrested for Holocaust Denial

Just a PSA that some of us don't need to go to Germany


http://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/holocaust-denier-arrested-in-germany/

From the article: Holocaust denier arrested in Germany

Canadian woman Monika Schaefer, who called the Shoah the most “persistent lie in all of history” is detained

That woman has the longest neck I have ever seen.

Jell0s sister?

Those Germans must be real touchy about their past.

It still dumbfounds me that some believe it never happened. The evidence is incontrovertible.....period.

You hear something stupid long enough, I guess you believe it. Someone had to be preaching that stupidity to her. So, there must be others who believe that.

Hmmmm..............I guess she now realizes she's not in Canada anymore eh?

Here's what she actually said that got her arrested. Of course, it's also illegal in Canada (France, England, etc., etc.) to deny WWII historical orthodoxy vis a vis the Jewish experience. Centuries ago, it was illegal to deny the Resurrection. Today, it's "The Holocaust." Makes you wonder who's in charge now. Organized Jewry is working overtime to figure a way to make it illegal in the US, too.

There are plenty others who believe it.

Here's the thing that bothers me......and I said this on the a recent thread concerning the Holocaust......the Jews have succeeded in turning the Holocaust into "the only genocide that matters." We know that far more people were killed in that time period by the Soviet Union, but that has been swept under a rug, and not allowed to be mentioned. Why?.........because the Jews have gone to great lengths to make sure of it. If someone can be arrested and charged with a hate crime because they deny the Holocaust, then why not do the same if they refuse to believe the atrocities of the Communists?

Murder is murder, and wrong, whether it was a Polish Jew put to death at Dachau, or a Ukrainian peasant put to death by Stalin's orders.

Well it still is a petty good way to get some PR even if it is bad PR. people do the darnedest things to get attention. She could be kin to Pelosi.

The "Holocaust" is a lie. Lumping people who know how to reason in with liberals is just wrong. That many of you believe the lie doesn't make it true. That many of you have never bothered to skeptically look at the whole tale, yet ridicule those that have and have come to a different conclusion, says much about you. That many of you seem to accept as ok that it is illegal to even question the story in most of the West says much about you.

Would you feel the same if other very politicized myths were also illegal to question? Global warming? Is that what conservatives do: jail people with the wrong beliefs? No, that's what liberal, neo-Marxists do. Would you be free, or would you force (and be forced into) a specific set of ideas that it would be against the law to question? Would that law speak to the validity of those beliefs, or to their utter fraudulence?

true enough, but to arrest someone for having an opposing view is sobering. Arrest them? Come on now.

Perhaps we should take up a collection to get TRH a one way ticket to Germany.

Could be.

Liberals just don't understand how important our Bill of Rights is, ALL of it. Our freedom of speech is something the rest of the world can't comprehend, along with our right to carry arms. If they can eliminate part of the BOR, they can eliminate all of it.

If the received mythology of “The Holocaust” narrative were true, it would require no law making questioning its details a crime.

Eisenhower was a far seeing genius to foresee that the genocide would be denied many years in the future. He did all he could to make sure as many people as possible saw it.

Wrong. What Ike saw was a total clusterfuck that’s typical on the losing side of any long drawn out major war, ie., lots of dead people (not just Jews) who died in horrible conditions from disease and starvation. He found no homicidal gas chambers and no systematic extermination program. If he did, no questions would remain and there would be no need to criminalize the normal processes of historical inquiry.

Here we go...