|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,697
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,697 |
I'm trying to use the 55 gran TTSX in a standard 223 Remington. So far, it's surprised me it hasn't come together quicker as I've had good luck with both Barnes in other calibers and most other bullets tried in this rifle.
So far I've tried: LC 14 brass, Remington 7 1/2 BR primer, Ramshot TAC R-P brass, CCI 400 primer, Ramshot TAC, Hodgdon H-4895, Hodgdon Varget COAL of 2.250" (0.052" off the lands in my rifle) for all loads
Nothing has really stood out and some of the data listed by Hodgdon has given anemic velocities. For instance, Hodgdon shows 24.0g as max for Varget giving 3,134 FPS for a 55g Barnes TSX FB. That load didn't even hit 2,900 FPS in my rifle! Their max charge for H4895 is 22.6g (for the same bullet) and shows it generating 3,110 FPS. That load didn't quite hit 2,700 FPS! And Barnes shows 24.5g of H4895 grains for the 62 grain bullets, so it would seem Hodgdon's data is quite low here (Barnes only lists IMR 4895 with their 55g bullets and H4895 with their 62g bullets)...
Granted, these are two different bullets and it's quite possible the TSX FB has more bearing surface and generates more pressure than the TTSX boat-tail. But that's a huge difference!
So far the most promising load looks like 24.8g of TAC with both the LC 14 / Rem 7 1/2 combo or the R-P / CCI 400 combo.
What's your 223 Rem load with the 55g TTSX and what kind of performance (velocity & group size) have you achieved with it?
“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” ― Patrick Rothfuss, The Wise Man's Fear
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,697
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,697 |
Oh, and the rifle in question is a Ruger Hawkeye All-weather with a 22 inch barrel sporting a 1:9" twist.
“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” ― Patrick Rothfuss, The Wise Man's Fear
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,066
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,066 |
Not sure what twist rate a Hawkeye has but that bullet is rumored to need a 10 twist to run well. Myself and a few others run 27-27.4 grains cfe 223with that bullet
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,071
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,071 |
Try inching your load up by 2/10 of a grain at a time. Watch for pressure signs. Your rifle might require more powder as rifles are different. You should be able to easily get 6 shots from a new case & still have decent primer pocket tension. If not you know you have exceeded safe pressures. There are those rifles for what ever reason handle a bit more powder than others. This can result from a generous chamber or a bore a bit larger .
Last edited by Hesp; 02/20/18.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,156
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,156 |
I use 28.0 CFE223 in IMI brass, CCI450 primer with the 55 gr. TTSX. It gives me 3300 out of my Ruger American and 3/4" groups.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4 |
I'd forget about Varget with that light of a bullet. Go with something like TAC, CFE223, N133 or Benchmark.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,822
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,822 |
27.4gr CFE-223 (below max in Barnes online data) CCI BR 4 primer Hornady, Winchester, Remington, Fiocchi, or LC 11 & LC 14 brass C.O.A.L. 2.250" No crimp.
1/2" - 3/4" five shot groups @ 100 yards out of three different .223's, all 1:8" twist. Two 16" barrels and one 18" barrel.
They kill whitetails, hogs, coyotes, and bobcats very, very well.
Ed
Last edited by APDDSN0864; 02/20/18. Reason: added text
"Not in an open forum, where truth has less value than opinions, where all opinions are equally welcome regardless of their origins, rationale, inanity, or truth, where opinions are neither of equal value nor decisive." Ken Howell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,697
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,697 |
Yeah, I tried Varget because I have it and because Hodgdon listed a decent potential 3,134 fps with a 55g Barnes... I know it's generally better suited to heavier bullets in the .223.
The powders I have already that may work: Ramshot TAC Hodgdon H4895 Hodgdon Varget Hodgdon Benchmark IMR 4198 Reloder 15
I'd rather find something that will work with what I have, but I'm not completely opposed to buying another pound to try. CFE 223 seems to have become a commonly recommended powder in the short time it's been on the market.
“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” ― Patrick Rothfuss, The Wise Man's Fear
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,822
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,822 |
Yeah, I tried Varget because I have it and because Hodgdon listed a decent potential 3,134 fps with a 55g Barnes... I know it's generally better suited to heavier bullets in the .223.
The powders I have already that may work: Ramshot TAC Hodgdon H4895 Hodgdon Varget Hodgdon Benchmark IMR 4198 Reloder 15
I'd rather find something that will work with what I have, but I'm not completely opposed to buying another pound to try. CFE 223 seems to have become a commonly recommended powder in the short time it's been on the market. Here's the Barnes online data. The 55gr TTSX is on page 6 of 8. LINKEd
"Not in an open forum, where truth has less value than opinions, where all opinions are equally welcome regardless of their origins, rationale, inanity, or truth, where opinions are neither of equal value nor decisive." Ken Howell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4 |
TAC and/or Benchmark ought to get you there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,156
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,156 |
On a side note I notice you're using CCI400 primers, I'd switch to CCI450's or BR4's. 400's have a thin cup (.020") and are really meant for use in older low pressure rounds like the 22 Hornet. The 450's and BR4's have thicker cups(.025") and will handle the pressure much better. I found this out when I was working up a load in my 20 practical and pierced some primers using CCI400's. Switching to 450's fixed it. The remington 7 1/2's have .025" cups so should be fine too. Here's an article I came upon when trying to figure out my pierced primer problem that explained it: Primers and Pressure
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,746 Likes: 15
Campfire Savant
|
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,746 Likes: 15 |
I use the 62 Barnes in mine. It has a 1 in 8 twist. Fine groups!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,741
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,741 |
From a 1:9 twisted Marlin X7S, I settled on:
25.5 grains H4895 for Either 53 TSX (30180) or 55 TTSX (30187) Hornady brass CCI 400 primers 53 TSX COAL = 2.250, V = 3,197 fps 55 TTSX COAL = 2.265, V = 3,188 fps
A previous lot of H4895 was sending them about 40 fps faster.
Both bullets group < .75”, and I can often get close to .4” if I don’t have a 3rd cup o’ coffee.
N = 1 on a boar was caught under the hide on the far side of the skull.
Neither CFE223 nor TAC would group these bullets in this rifle, though velocity was good. Kinda like how some of my kids love my cooking, and the others could just take it or leave it. Takes a little tweaking to see what things each of them will eat.
FC
Last edited by Folically_Challenged; 02/20/18.
"Every day is a holiday, and every meal is a banquet."
- Mrs. FC
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4 |
From a 1:9 twisted Marlin X7S, I settled on:
25.5 grains H4895 for Either 53 TSX (30180) or 55 TTSX (30187) Hornady brass CCI 400 primers 53 TSX COAL = 2.250, V = 3,197 fps 55 TTSX COAL = 2.265, V = 3,188 fps
A previous lot of H4895 was sending them about 40 fps faster.
Both bullets group < .75”, and I can often get close to .4” if I don’t have a 3rd cup o’ coffee.
N = 1 on a boar was caught under the hide on the far side of the skull.
Neither CFE223 nor TAC would group these bullets in this rifle, though velocity was good. Kinda like how some of my kids love my cooking, and the others could just take it or leave it. Takes a little tweaking to see what things each of them will eat.
FC
Were you using 400's when those ball powders wouldn't group?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,741
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,741 |
Yup. Hadn’t even thought about it ‘til you mentioned it. FC
"Every day is a holiday, and every meal is a banquet."
- Mrs. FC
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,331
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,331 |
On a side note I notice you're using CCI400 primers, I'd switch to CCI450's or BR4's. 400's have a thin cup (.020") and are really meant for use in older low pressure rounds like the 22 Hornet. The 450's and BR4's have thicker cups(.025") and will handle the pressure much better. I found this out when I was working up a load in my 20 practical and pierced some primers using CCI400's. Switching to 450's fixed it. The remington 7 1/2's have .025" cups so should be fine too. Here's an article I came upon when trying to figure out my pierced primer problem that explained it: Primers and PressureMy Speer # 13 manual lists the CCI 400 for all 223 loads and the 450 for ball powder. I have an old brick of 400s but have never used any. I do use Win SRs and they are only .021 vs .020 for the 400. That link also shows that the Fed is only .019. Question, does thickness really equate to strength or is it the material also? I did find out the hard way about Rem 6 1/2. I had no idea they were for low pressure only. They sure as hell aren't marked to that effect! I googled CCI 400s and find many people use them in 223, even ARs. Now I don't know whether to use mine or not.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300 Likes: 1
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300 Likes: 1 |
I use 28.0 CFE223 in IMI brass, CCI450 primer with the 55 gr. TTSX. It gives me 3300 out of my Ruger American and 3/4" groups. Same here but getting a touch over 3200 in a 1 in 8 twist Tikka...
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,365
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,365 |
I use 27.0grs of Varget, for bullets from 50gr to 69gr, works really well with the 55gr ttsx
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,995
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,995 |
I honestly don't think you can get enough Varget in the 223 case to exceed it's pressure limits with a 55 gr bullet. I used 26 grs of Varget for years in my service rifle and a 69 SMK, and loaded my LC cases many, many times without a problem. The chamber was a wylde with a long throat, so that might have influenced pressures a bit.
When people face the possibility of freezing or starving there is little chance they are going to listen to unfounded claims of climate doomsday from a bunch of ultra-rich yacht sailing private jet-setting carbon-spewing hypocrite elites
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,156
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,156 |
Question, does thickness really equate to strength or is it the material also? I did find out the hard way about Rem 6 1/2. I had no idea they were for low pressure only. They sure as hell aren't marked to that effect!
I think the 400 & 450's are the same material just thicker for the 450's. I couldn't tell you for sure but all I know is that I got pierced primers with the 400's and don't with the 450's.
|
|
|
|
519 members (12344mag, 1beaver_shooter, 160user, 10gaugeman, 17CalFan, 10gaugemag, 49 invisible),
2,271
guests, and
1,176
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,513
Posts18,490,790
Members73,972
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|