I’ve long known Jeff was a liberal but could tolerate him because he was decent in his posts even when he was being attacked he usually remained decent, and for that I chose to disagree with him but I had a begrudging respect. I no longer feel that way and believe he’s gone off the deep end and not in a good way. 😁
No you guys just beat him up a few too many times. Simple as that.
Hardly! The majority of men here are good and decent guys and were willing to put politics aside and give him help or advice off screen but it seems he’s mined this place for everything he needed and now it’s time for him to chit all over it.
He got a fair bit of help with lathe and machine shop info and then tried to chit on the member that helped him.
His attitude change is partially due to Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) and partially due to the fact that he’s an ungrateful, arrogant, liberal fa.g. He got what he wanted now he wants to act like a douchebag on his way out.
�Politicians are the lowest form of life on earth. Liberal Democrats are the lowest form of politician.� �General George S. Patton, Jr.
How can a sitting President, the boss of the DOJ(by constitutional authority) obstruct justice while managing his people? He can't!
You people are making this [bleep] up to suit your own deluded narrative. Put the bong down. He's the boss at the DOJ. If he tells them to eat [bleep] and die, then they do it or get fired for cause,. All constitutional. Sorry for you.
"The Democrat Party looks like Titanic survivors. Partying and celebrating one moment, and huddled in lifeboats freezing the next". Hatari 2017
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid." Han Solo
How can a sitting President, the boss of the DOJ(by constitutional authority) obstruct justice while managing his people? He can't!
You people are making this [bleep] up to suit your own deluded narrative. Put the bong down. He's the boss at the DOJ. If he tells them to eat [bleep] and die, then they do it or get fired for cause,. All constitutional. Sorry for you.
Thats not in the least bit fair, Hat. LeaRoy hasnt the brains to contemplate or argue that.
Ecc 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I’ve long known Jeff was a liberal but could tolerate him because he was decent in his posts even when he was being attacked he usually remained decent, and for that I chose to disagree with him but I had a begrudging respect. I no longer feel that way and believe he’s gone off the deep end and not in a good way. 😁
He’s nothing more than an ignorant liberal with mental health issues. Fuggem.
He's an unemployed drug addict on disability that smokes weed all day.
Not much that he posts should be surprising.
Last edited by deflave; 05/03/18.
Originally Posted by Geno67
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual.
Originally Posted by Judman
Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit.
Originally Posted by KSMITH
My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
I’ve long known Jeff was a liberal but could tolerate him because he was decent in his posts even when he was being attacked he usually remained decent, and for that I chose to disagree with him but I had a begrudging respect. I no longer feel that way and believe he’s gone off the deep end and not in a good way. 😁
He’s nothing more than an ignorant liberal with mental health issues. Fuggem.
He's an employed drug addict on disability that smokes weed all day.
Not much that he posts should be surprising.
And yet people keep responding to him and other idiots like Paddler, LeroyBeans, GunTruck, etc.
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
Don't forget the falling off a ladder incident was a seminal tragedy in his life...
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
Rudy Giuliani claimed over the weekend that the president of the United States need not comply with a subpoena to testify if he is called by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. But this dubious legal argument was clearly rebutted, back in 1998, by then-New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani. As President Donald Trump’s new legal counsel, Giuliani has undermined much of the president’s legal defense and admitted to a limited understanding of the facts. In a recent ABC This Week interview, he argued that presidents are exempt from subpoenas. “We don’t have to. He’s the president of the United States,” Giuliani told host George Stephanopoulos. “We can assert the same privileges other presidents have.” But 20 years ago, when Bill Clinton was in the White House, Giuliani took the exact opposite view. In a July 21, 1998 interview with Charlie Rose, he was asked about whether the president would have to testify before Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr’s grand jury if subpoenaed. “You gotta do it. I’m mean you don’t have a choice,” Giuliani, a former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York opined. He added that if Clinton wanted to challenge it, he’d have to convince a judge of some sort of recognizable exemption privilege. “And if a judge decides he doesn’t, then you have to testify. You don’t have a choice about that,” Giuliani said. Clinton voluntarily testified a month later. “Under the criminal law, everyone should be treated the same,” 1998 Giuliani said. “And I know there are some people that say the president should be treated stricter. We used to have an era where the president was treated much more leniently. But I think the right answer is the president should be treated — as far as the criminal law is concerned, the president is a citizen.”
It's almost like partisanship has et up his brain since 1998.
Rudy Giuliani claimed over the weekend that the president of the United States need not comply with a subpoena to testify if he is called by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. But this dubious legal argument was clearly rebutted, back in 1998, by then-New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani. As President Donald Trump’s new legal counsel, Giuliani has undermined much of the president’s legal defense and admitted to a limited understanding of the facts. In a recent ABC This Week interview, he argued that presidents are exempt from subpoenas. “We don’t have to. He’s the president of the United States,” Giuliani told host George Stephanopoulos. “We can assert the same privileges other presidents have.” But 20 years ago, when Bill Clinton was in the White House, Giuliani took the exact opposite view. In a July 21, 1998 interview with Charlie Rose, he was asked about whether the president would have to testify before Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr’s grand jury if subpoenaed. “You gotta do it. I’m mean you don’t have a choice,” Giuliani, a former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York opined. He added that if Clinton wanted to challenge it, he’d have to convince a judge of some sort of recognizable exemption privilege. “And if a judge decides he doesn’t, then you have to testify. You don’t have a choice about that,” Giuliani said. Clinton voluntarily testified a month later. “Under the criminal law, everyone should be treated the same,” 1998 Giuliani said. “And I know there are some people that say the president should be treated stricter. We used to have an era where the president was treated much more leniently. But I think the right answer is the president should be treated — as far as the criminal law is concerned, the president is a citizen.”
It's almost like partisanship has et up his brain since 1998.
Hint: you [bleep] resemble that remark!
Ecc 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
