Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Krauthammer Dead.

Hi nighthawk,

I'd like to suggest that you search engine, "Neoconservative Leo Strauss." Neocons are worse that liberals. But then again, neocons are liberals.

There is nothing fuzzy about the construct of neoconservatism. My suggestion is to know their agenda, for they will destroy the Second Amendment as quickly as Chucky Schumer and Diane Feinstein. Neocons are globalists. The Second Amendment is a huge impediment to assimilating us into the New World Order, or one-world-government, or globalism; they're synonymous constructs. American sovereignty is another huge impediment for globalists to vanquish prior to New World Order assimilation, which was why Krauthammer sought to destroy it.

Neocons were responsible for the destruction of our distinctly American culture that was founded upon Christian morality.

The First Amendment applies to governmental regulation of free speech.

Krauthammer was polished. He possessed excellent oratory skills. It was what he delivered that revealed his loyalty, and it was vastly different than core tenets of authentic conservatism. Obama had the identical polished delivery. I call it the intellectual pose and narrative. They convey an image of elevated intellect and knowledge. But stripped bare, they're propagandists. Propagandists look good, convey rarefied body language, talk eloquently, but their message is hostile to American sovereignty and maximum individual liberty.

Krauthammer was liberal feigning conservative loyalty. He was a fraud.

I put him in the same class a William Buckley and George Will, which is high praise. Nearly as good was William Safire. Jonah Goldberg is still good. Once upon a time Kathleen Parker made sense. One oddity on the liberal left is Froma Harrop. I disagree with her values, and usually her conclusions and goals. But she writes well, doesn't take cheap shots, makes valid arguments. Her stuff starts from real problems and is well thought out. She is a far cry from the usual liberal tripe and worth reading if you seek challenging view points.

Hi nighthawk,

I'd like to suggest that you search engine, "Neoconservative Leo Strauss." Neocons are worse that liberals. But then again, neocons are liberals.

There is nothing fuzzy about the construct of neoconservatism. My suggestion is to know their agenda, for they will destroy the Second Amendment as quickly as Chucky Schumer and Diane Feinstein. Neocons are globalists. The Second Amendment is a huge impediment to assimilating us into the New World Order, or one-world-government, or globalism; they're synonymous constructs. American sovereignty is another huge impediment for globalists to vanquish prior to New World Order assimilation, which was why Krauthammer sought to destroy it.
Neocons were responsible for the destruction of our distinctly American culture that was founded upon Christian morality.
The First Amendment applies to governmental regulation of free speech.

Krauthammer was polished. He possessed excellent oratory skills. It was what he delivered that revealed his loyalty, and it was vastly different than core tenets of authentic conservatism. Obama had the identical polished delivery. I call it the intellectual pose and narrative. They convey an image of elevated intellect and knowledge. But stripped bare, they're propagandists. Propagandists look good, convey rarefied body language, talk eloquently, but their message is hostile to American sovereignty and maximum individual liberty.

Krauthammer was liberal feigning conservative loyalty. He was a fraud.

I don't know how to define neocon either.

It's like "deep state" and "artificial intelligence (AI)," all fuzzy enough to mean whatever you want them to mean.

Anyone who can clearly and rationally articulate his point of view cannot be an "enemy" even if you disagree. See the principles behind the First Amendment.